5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-18 0430 +cabadejo

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-18 0430 +cabadejo
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/484WynTxpcj
https://pastebin.com/0xucBDLG
__


+cabadejo __ [Warning! This is VERY LONG! I apologise! I am off to sleep. Don't worry about reading this - just skim over it if you want. It is more a set of notes for myself as a reminder about various things! I cannot give you a medal or prize if you do read through this epic Lesta-sized ramble but you would deserve one!]



I haven't pointed out the "seamless edit" because I first require some footage from a "science approved" and "trusted" YouTuber that is considered authentic and is vouched for.



(I am half asleep and off to sleep the moment I send this so forgive any typos or awkward phrasing.)



When I show that the "ISS" footage supplied to me by the "trusted science guru" is fabricated (never ask a question you don't already know the answer to - especially when it is someone considered "hostile"!) then it will be a matter of pointing out the seamless/perfect edit (which can only be understood by applying some simple logic [thus I will need to do some videos on "chump logic" to address any auto-denial for the "ISS" video]). Sadly (!) a person will need to have an IQ over 100 and will also need to be good, rational, intelligent and in the mood to hear some unpleasant truths. Otherwise what I do will be auto-denied but what I have coming up should be the best presentation of "proof" anyone has hitherto given (if anyone really had then the whole world would already be well on the way to being "awake").



__



Archiving the comments is not so people wade through "War and Peace". It's the prove that the comments were written in the first place and it's to reinforce in my own head the ideas I need to focus on. What follows is a ramble on many of those ideas that need to be described and connected together.



(My "comment pastes" are for me! They are not _really_ for anyone else. They are for ME but I am making MY THOUGHTS available to everyone else. Because that's full discloser. That's being "out in the open". That's being transparent. As far as I know absolutely no one else has ever done that. If a meaningful attack on the lie system is to succeed then everything has to be placed "out in the open".)



When I have finished dumping down the ideas that is when I will go through ALL of the comments I have written - extract the salient points and write some essays. THAT will be for everyday people. Perhaps I have not been clear on this! With a video that will be finished (probably) tomorrow you will see what I mean about "dumping down the thoughts together" so as to then extract the key points. (You'll see why things are being done the way they are.)



Every word I write focuses my mind on what's needed and what's important. Each repetition turns this it into a habit and an instinct. And then all that's needed is the "best example" to reach a "normal person" for each idea and concept. That's what's happening here. Then it would require my "opposite" (i.e., a representative of the lie system) to counter each of the points I am making in order to render inert what I am pointing out (bring it on!).



My comment pastes are not supposed to be read for everyone (but yet they can be)! They are for everyone - but until I start writing essays they're really for me.



I also don't have the time to re-write each comment to give the main points. That will all happen when it comes time to write the essays.



When I say "I am 70% complete" - I mean that I have dumped down about 70% of the ideas. I have a few more things to do and then I can start writing essays. That is when I may not be here for a few days at a time as I focus exclusively on doing that. (Any website can keep an archive of all of the individual comments, screenshots, etc.)



__



With regard to the background "astronaut". As you say, if it's the same person it is magnitudes worse because at the very least the shirt is different. The fact his hair appears lighter when his shirt appears darker is proof that his shirt has been changed.



I will need to identify who he is and who he might also be so that a person doesn't simply say another person "floated down". If it's the same person then that is very damaging. If it's not the same person it is only SLIGHTLY less damaging because *at all times the key [and only!] point being made is that a DEFINITE edit has been done during an otherwise "seamless motion".* That's the FIRST STEP in proving there are much more seamless edits where "NASA" have wilfully sought to hide any "masking glitches".



An edit done during a "seamless motion" shows that "NASA" not only think about doing such things but actually do it.



Here's the thing: 1) I have some footage that proves a seamless edit where the rest of the footage appears flawless. 2) I ALSO KNOW WHERE THE JOINS ARE HAPPENING WITH EVERYDAY CLIPS!



There are very subtle "stiches/joins" happening but a belief controlled person is "blind" to them ("blind" as in "domestic blindness"). They will ONLY be able to view it as a "video glitch" or "video defect" but that is what "NASA" is using to disguise them.



Having said that - to repeat - it is not about "NASA" faking the "ISS". *It is at all times that the "ISS" CAN be doubted in the first place.* How might "NASA" make something real appear fake? By causing little "glitches" (of the sort I will point out) throughout their videos. By making real things appear fake the lie system misleads and misdirects a "conspiracy theorist" into DENYING REALITY. People often think in opposites. To give an example (that the lie system is encouraging): If the Earth is not a ball then it must be flat. (But there are other shapes!) The lie system does not care that you reject an event or claim *just so long as you are rejecting events and claims for the WRONG REASONS!* (For example, a lot of people disbelieve the "ISS" because they have convinced themselves that rockets cannot work in a vacuum.  If it turns out that rockets CAN work in a vacuum then the person who held that belief will (if he or she is honest) feel profoundly stupid but then likely go into the opposite direction! Suddenly "it's all real" ("I was wrong about the rockets therefore I was wrong about everything"). I am too tired to explain this better but it is a profound concept.

This seems to be the purpose of "disinformation". When a person believes disinformation that can later be shown to be wrong then that person will experience a "reversal". I saw people artificially recreating this during "TransAsia". Some people clung to some flawed reasons to dismiss "TransAsia". Then then "saw through it" and "had a revelation". Suddenly it must be real! While those people were probably deceitful it served to encourage others to believe "TransAsia" was real. I have also seen people go from saying "Sandy Hook was a hoax" to "Sandy Hook was a real massacre" because items of disinformation were believed and then later shown to be wrong. Because their belief was founded on the appearances of proof the belief got undermined and a reversal naturally followed.


(If I am shown "sufficient proof" of the alleged "ISS" there won't be a reversal because I am rejecting it for the right reasons: that there IS NO sufficient proof and that it is this lack of sufficient proof that proves we are in a lie system. If something is real then there is every possibility there IS some sufficient proof but it is reserved for individuals to prove to them it is real so that they can be turned against those who are saying it isn't. Again - I am overdue for sleep - this is an important point/concept but I am too tired to go into it now. A genuine dissident always rejects events and claims for the RIGHT reasons and not ever for the wrong reasons. Thus to be shown sufficient proof will not cause a "reversal" because the belief was not founded on disinformation and the dispute is taking place on a different level.)



____



Just as I have pointed out the significant (as in undeniable) "masking glitch" there are also very subtle "micro glitches". It is these "micro glitches" that give a person who is looking for sufficient proof a reason to DOUBT the footage.



And thus - at all times - it comes down to TRUST. To trusting that the same group of people who we believe drop bombs on children would not also lie to children (that's taboo!).



We are never given "a pure straight clip of sustained duration zero gravity that remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans". THEREFORE! Any and ALL believe that there is a real and manned centabillion dollar zero gravity research facility is founded on TRUST.



When one event or claim is accepted on trust (and supported by proof's appearances) then human psychology leads us to trust ALL OTHER events and claims from the SAME GROUP.



Yes - there are people who claim that "Sandy Hook" was fake or that "Boston Marathon Bombing" was fake or that the "Aurora Shooting" was fake. But these people *DO NOT REALLY BELIEVE THOSE EVENTS ARE TRULY FAKE* because if they did then they would ALSO come to doubt the "ISS".



They would ALSO come to doubt the shape of the planet.



If a person claims "Boston" was a fake event but DOES NOT also question the "ISS" and does not also question the "shape of the Earth" then that person is being arbitrary!



They are CHOOSING to accept the appearances of proof for some things as a substitute for proof itself (i.e., sufficient proof).



From birth we have been training ourselves to accept the appearances of proof instead of proof. When that happens (just like doubt suppression training) we get a little better at it. We have never been shown sufficient proof (for any lie system event or clam) and so we have no expectation of it etc. We don't even notice that it's missing!



And because we were all born INTO a lie system our DEFAULT starting point is that it's "ALL REAL". We each spent a good amount of our life BELIEVING the events and claims of the lie system. The only way to believe something is real (when it is doubtable) is if we TRUST the entity/group making the claims etc.



Thus - because we BELIEVE something is real we are "belief controlled". If we believe something is real then we SEE IT AS REAL. That means a person who watches an "ISS" time-lapse with city lights of the world all appearing in the same way with lightning flashes appearing at the same speed as normal lightning flashes (even though it's a time-lapse and so if slowed down to "normal speed" the lightning would be lasting for minutes at a time!) it all appears real! It LOOKS real! In nature our senses cannot lie to us (we cannot see what's not there). Our minds take in everything as true (this is why television can be so evil because it can fill our heads with lies which are accepted as true - because our physiology has no concept of a "lie" - if we see a murder on television then our mind accepts it as a real murder. It is only our conscious mind that can override the reaction!



To help understand: suppose you are dreaming and there is a murder - your reaction to it is "real" and because you're dreaming your conscious mind cannot kick in and say "don't worry - it's just a dream". The opposite happens when a person watches television - we see a murder but our conscious mind can suppress the emotional response! But it still goes into our HEAD as a murder but we "know not to react to it" - but we do a little. We cannot help but react a little. Anyone who has watched a movie and found themselves laughing or crying has failed to fully suppress their reaction! When we watch a movie we "allow ourselves" to be a "little bit affected" - this is probably why movies are so FASCINATING to people - because they give experiences they cannot have in their day to day life.


Anyway! Again - this is an important point but I am too tired to do it justice. For what it's worth "Lesta approved television" would be shows such as dancing, cooking shows, sport and educational things! i.e., anything which is not LYING to the viewer - such as a murder etc.)



Because we are conscious as we watch television we can suppress the full response. Television and movies also give us "cues and clues" that it's not real. That is why we don't panic and believe world war has broken out or that aliens have invaded if we visit someone and they have a television on in the background. We have become extremely sensitive [and skilled] to suppressing a reaction. Imagine a situation on the street where there is an emergency. Your adrenaline kicks in. Now imagine everyone starts laughing and it clearly becomes some "street theatre" - you are able to suppress the reaction you were otherwise experiencing. "Emotional response suppression training" I suppose it could be called. It is where you don't panic just because the television is on and there is an explosion. But it all goes into your head as real. Consciously you know not to react to it - but "unconsciously" you still do.



If you have a dream about it - then you react to it terribly - possibly a nightmare etc. Because your "conscious censor" isn't working.


______


Could it be that when "humans" were not tamed and farmed that we were in a permanent kind of "dream" state? Could it be that the animals around us are in a permanent "dream state" but anyway - I'm getting side-tracked because I'm overdue for sleep!

______



If something is (especially OBVIOUSLY) FAKE but appears REAL to a person then we are dealing with someone who is "colour blind" (I use this term to refer to a person who is unable [powerless] to discern between real and pretend).



Just today I have found out that the "John Kirszenberg" twit may actually be a genuine person! If he is (okay, I'm being lenient - I don't know if he is but it's possible) then he is PURELY colour blind.



Because he BELIEVES it's all real - then the obviously fake/CGI "NASA" time-lapse look and seem REAL to him. _They just do!_ For me to say it's fake or to suggest that there is nobody really living, breathing, eating and s!tting (just not showering) inside of a magic floating tin toilet then to him - to "John Kirszenberg" I MUST be a liar. I MUST be deceitful. I MUST be a "disinformation agent" etc.



How else can he resolve this? If it looks real to him and if he TRUSTS "NASA" and if all the top experts are "going along with it" (in much the same way all of the world's adults go along with "Santa" during Christmas time) then he is powerless to doubt - he is rendered powerless to suspend belief. *He MUST see me as a bad person - as a liar.* He has no choice (how nice for the lie system that it works out that way).



*Everything I have just written* (which was long but quickly typed - I am off to sleep the moment after I send this) *is the problem we are all in.* This is the "spell" we are under. This is the "entrancement" - the "fascination". *This is the PLACEBO EFFECT we are all INFLUENCED by [victims of].*



This is a "placebo planet" because the lie system understands that we are affected by the "placebo effect" (suggestion) and all you need to do is repeat something enough and it becomes reality for a person. *Things are repeated into reality.* If you talk about the "ISS" enough then people will simply believe it. New children who are born into a world with the "ISS" simply accept it as a reality. Events and claims are repeated into reality and then accepted as real without having to be "proven" by subsequent generations of children.



(Later on you can ABANDON the "ISS" - no longer have one - but the BELIEF that it ONCE EXISTED will remain!)



Anyway! The problem is how to communicate all of this (and I've had to leave several things out) in such a way that every "normal person" can see it and will not be able to deny it. I.e., how to make it undeniable and obvious such as the undeniable and obvious edit done in the "NASA" video.



What I know is that each person exercises their imagination (limited only by their "natural intelligence") to invent "plausible explanations" for each oddity and anomaly. And so another task is to think about all of the possible objections and "plausible explanations" AGAINST the above outlined ideas and observations.



I can see that "Occam's Razor" (in its corrupted form) will be invoked. For example: *_"But Lesta, what you're suggesting would require millions of people to be in on a gigantic conspiracy! That's absurd - the simpler explanation is that it's just real - Occam's Razor for the win!"_*



Of course - anyone who says that does not seem to realise that they are participating in a giant conspiracy themselves every single year by pretending to children that there is "Santa" etc. But they don't think of it that way! "But Lesta, that's different!" - no, not really. Kids are still being duped by all of the adults. Huge and complicated rituals are going on. And no one sits the child down and explains "this is just BS - it's just a ritual people do" etc. Well, "Occam's Razor" would have us believe "Santa" must be real because the alternative is too complex and ridiculous! Maybe for one year - but year after year for generations?! Hah! It cannot be a "conspiracy"!



In effect - as "genuine dissidents" - we are effectively having to tell everyone that "Santa isn't real folks!" (it's that cringe-worthy and obvious).



There is a thing called "Poe's Law" where a person pretends to take on a belief - such as something "normal people" would consider stupid but does so in such a "dry way" that the audience believes they believe. (This COULD be a lie system way of dealing with some dissidents - by claiming they were "joking all along".)



A "normal person" believes dinosaurs existed. Therefore a so-called "Poe" would be someone who pretends dinosaurs don't exist and give "reasons". This would be done in such a dry and serious way that the audience is left thinking "hey, that person really does not believe dinosaurs!"



In a sense - the fact people insist the "ISS" is real is a kind of "reverse Poe" to me. *It is so OBVIOUSLY fake and it is so OBVIOUSLY doubtable that it seems absurd to me that anyone (upon scrutiny) could try and tell me it's a serious thing.* _Surely they are Poes!_



But apparently they're not - and if they're not it is only because they are "colour blind".



Anyway! I've written far more than I thought I would and I am typing on a crappy keyboard (because I did not expect to write much!) and now my fingers hurt. So that will do!



Until the next time! ))



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w