16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-11 0435 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-11 0435 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/u/0/108131621397475586556/posts/GdVjmnYfcDX
https://pastebin.com/0nYk5HKF
__

+nationalparksign __ Each time "NASA" releases images like this it *trains the audience's expectations* of what "it all looks like".

All of these images from "NASA" - purportedly of real objects in space - are indistinguishable from poorly and quickly made CGI.

>> *If it is being faked then this kind of thing can be faked incredibly easily*. <<

Full and complete trust is therefore required - _as one can anticipate to be the case in a lie system_.

*If it is not being faked then billions of dollars are being used to produce images that look like something a cat could composite accidentally just by walking across a keyboard while Photoshop is actively loaded*.

The population ought to be outraged every time "NASA" shows one of these "images".

When you consider all of the "cleaning" videos and the "water bubble" videos and all of these *worthless* "images/composites" *you have to wonder what the f_kc is going on*.

Perhaps it's not hard to figure out given that "NASA" also has representation at comic-con. How is "NASA" and the "ISS" anything other than *a propaganda platform to excite the imagination of children so as to impress upon them the required and desired beliefs of the lie system*?

Even if what "NASA" does is real - it is being done in such a way to require *full trust* in that which is indistinguishable from *outright fakery*.

There may be a sneaky reason for this. A time will come when everyday folk have access to computers and software that can easily produce genuinely photorealistic images of "planets and their surfaces". By having worthless quality images the audience will find itself reasoning that it "must be real" because: _"If 'NASA' were faking it then they would make it look far more realistic than they do. Therefore it must be real!"_

(I can see that this would be the "reasoning" used in the coming decades.)





__________

+nationalparksign __ Yes, "NASA" (and especially the "ISS") is for children and for adults who have remained as children.



"NASA" and what it purportedly does is a natural consequence of television. *It is unlikely there would have been any alleged "Moon landings" if there had been no televisions for it to have been "broadcast" to* (even if the capability genuinely existed to have gone to the Moon before the advent of television).



I once posted a video pointing out the "spread of television sets" with the various claims made by "NASA" and pals. As television became more widespread so too did the incredible claims about rockets and various "feats concerning space" etc.



I wouldn't say "NASA" is so much late to the game - rather - that "NASA" is doing what it was always intended to do by taking the lie system method to an even larger audience thanks to television and now the Internet.





______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.