(RE Blade of the Northern Lights)
Whether or not he is [[WP:LAWYER|wikilawyering]] has no place in this discussion. The DRV is a formal process, one in which such acts are allowed. That being said, I do not see where LiteralKa has used technicalities of policies, whilst ignoring the "heart" of the policies, nor have I seen him using them as a way to "defeat" others, but instead seems to be using them to flesh out his argument. Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see his actions as Wikilawering.
If you believe Jimbo should be treated as a normal user, why should he even be mentioned in this discussion? By your argument of him being a normal user, anything that I say, outside of this DRV, talk page, or the wiki, would have no place here, so should his, as a ''normal user''? You cannot enjoy welfare while making billions.
Next, while many people may or may not be nonpartisan when reading his page, it must also be pointed out that Jimbo, as a user, is totally unaware of the GNAA, and has little knowledge of it. As such, he does not meet the quidelines for "interested people", whom ought to be contacted to flesh out a discussion. To reach
It appears to me that it was not only (riffic), but many others that shared his POV, though (LiteralKa) never cited them outside of the weasle-worded phrase. Even so, I do not see it as much of a stretch to agree that the GNAA is notable. With weev incarcerated, due to an incident that was widely reported on, and has continuing coverage on notable news sources, the page doesn't have any qualms with [WP:INHERITED].

(RE Sven)
Might you cite the "multiple occasions" in which Jimbo has said these things?~~~~