Round #1:

22 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
URU: 0
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 10
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2
HIN: 0
SAY: 0

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
3 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: HIN was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #2:

21 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
URU: 0
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 10
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2
SAY: 0

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: SAY was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #3:

20 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
URU: 0
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 10
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
URU has the lowest number of votes with 0 votes (0.00%)

Round #4:

19 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 10
DIZ: 1
JEL: 2
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
ERI: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
7 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 4. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: ERI was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #5:

18 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 10
DIZ: 1
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
RIE: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
6 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: RIE was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #6:

17 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 59
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
DIZ: 1
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 10
RUN: 1
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 59 votes (47.20%)
5 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: RUN was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #7:

16 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 60
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
DIZ: 1
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 10
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 60 votes (48.00%)
4 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: DIZ was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #8:

15 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 61
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
REM: 1
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 10
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 61 votes (48.80%)
3 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: REM was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #9:

14 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 61
NAS: 1
IOR: 9
MIC: 9
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 11
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 61 votes (48.80%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 2 losers left.
Tiebreaker: Use 3. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: NAS was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #10:

13 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 61
IOR: 9
MIC: 10
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
AIR: 2
SHI: 1
PAN: 11
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 61 votes (48.80%)
SHI has the lowest number of votes with 1 votes (0.80%)

Round #11:

12 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 62
IOR: 9
MIC: 10
TEN: 5
LUM: 11
JEL: 3
EMB: 2
AIR: 2
PAN: 11
EIM: 3
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 62 votes (49.60%)
3 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 2 votes (1.60%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: EMB was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #12:

11 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 62
IOR: 9
MIC: 10
TEN: 5
LUM: 12
JEL: 3
AIR: 2
PAN: 11
EIM: 4
MUY: 2

LIA has the highest number of votes with 62 votes (49.60%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 2 votes (1.60%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: AIR was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #13:

10 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 62
IOR: 9
MIC: 10
TEN: 5
LUM: 12
JEL: 3
PAN: 12
EIM: 4
MUY: 3

LIA has the highest number of votes with 62 votes (49.60%)
2 candidates have the lowest number of votes with 3 votes (2.40%)

Tiebreaker: Use 2. votes: 1 losers left.

Tiebreaker: MUY was selected as the loser of the round.

Round #14:

9 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 62
IOR: 9
MIC: 11
TEN: 5
LUM: 12
JEL: 3
PAN: 14
EIM: 4

LIA has the highest number of votes with 62 votes (49.60%)
JEL has the lowest number of votes with 3 votes (2.40%)

Round #15:

8 candidates and 125 ballots.

Number of first votes per candidate:
SGC: 5
LIA: 63
IOR: 9
MIC: 11
TEN: 5
LUM: 12
PAN: 16
EIM: 4

LIA has the highest number of votes with 63 votes (50.40%)
EIM has the lowest number of votes with 4 votes (3.20%)

LIA won!