Skip to content
Skip to content
Bloomberg the Company & Its ProductsBloomberg Anywhere LoginBloomberg Terminal Demo Request

Bloomberg
Subscribe

relates to Facebook Has Assembled a Small Army of Fact-Checkers. Too Small.
relates to Dassault Systemes Is Said to Eye U.S. Deals Including Medidata
relates to Singapore in Talks With More Electric Car Companies After Dyson
relates to KKR's EmCare Says Patient and Employee Personal Data Were Hacked
relates to Marijuana Delivery App Crashes on Pot Industry's Black Friday
relates to Data Breaches Won't Derail Singapore's Tech Push, Minister Says
relates to Lyft's Fast-Slumping Stock Quickly Leads to Investor Lawsuits
relates to Rural Nevada Creating a Virtual Presidential Campaign Trail
relates to SoftBank Group International CFO Alok Sama to Step Down
relates to Facebook Has Assembled a Small Army of Fact-Checkers. Too Small.
relates to Dassault Systemes Is Said to Eye U.S. Deals Including Medidata
relates to Singapore in Talks With More Electric Car Companies After Dyson
relates to KKR's EmCare Says Patient and Employee Personal Data Were Hacked
relates to Marijuana Delivery App Crashes on Pot Industry's Black Friday
relates to Data Breaches Won't Derail Singapore's Tech Push, Minister Says
relates to Lyft's Fast-Slumping Stock Quickly Leads to Investor Lawsuits
relates to Rural Nevada Creating a Virtual Presidential Campaign Trail
relates to SoftBank Group International CFO Alok Sama to Step Down
relates to Facebook Has Assembled a Small Army of Fact-Checkers. Too Small.
relates to Dassault Systemes Is Said to Eye U.S. Deals Including Medidata
relates to Singapore in Talks With More Electric Car Companies After Dyson
relates to KKR's EmCare Says Patient and Employee Personal Data Were Hacked
relates to Marijuana Delivery App Crashes on Pot Industry's Black Friday
relates to Data Breaches Won't Derail Singapore's Tech Push, Minister Says
relates to Lyft's Fast-Slumping Stock Quickly Leads to Investor Lawsuits
relates to Rural Nevada Creating a Virtual Presidential Campaign Trail
relates to SoftBank Group International CFO Alok Sama to Step Down
technology
Musk Takes On Panasonic in Rare Public Battle With Key Supplier
By
Dana Hull
and
Pavel Alpeyev
April 21, 2019, 5:00 PM EDT

    In tweet, he squabbles with battery maker over production
    ‘Tesla and Panasonic need couples counseling,’ analyst says

Elon Musk
Elon Musk Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
Tweet
Post
Email

Elon Musk has engaged in Twitter spats with a long line of folks, from rival automakers to short-sellers and the Securities & Exchange Commission.

He’s at it again, but this time the stakes could be even higher. He’s in a rare public dispute with a critical supplier: Panasonic Corp., the company that makes all of the lithium-ion battery cells that power Tesla Inc.’s electric vehicles.

The rift started with reports the companies are tempering expansion plans at their jointly operated battery plant near Reno, Nevada. Musk shot back in tweets that Panasonic is the culprit by operating at a reduced pace, constraining production of Tesla’s Model 3 sedan.

Even by Musk’s standards, it’s highly unusual for a company and its largest supplier to duel so openly. And the tiff once again raises questions about Tesla’s ability to sustain profitability amid concerns about demand. Tesla delivered just 63,000 cars globally in the first quarter, compared with almost 91,000 in the previous three months, and its stock is down almost 18 percent this year. Panasonic’s apparent reluctance to boost battery production only adds to the skepticism -- and it may portend greater troubles.

“Tesla and Panasonic need couples counseling ASAP,” said Craig Irwin of Roth Capital Partners. “This is looking like a much more acrimonious relationship.”
Odd Couple

Tesla and Panasonic have been joined at the hip since the gigafactory agreement was first announced in July 2014, even if on paper they’re a bit of an odd couple. One is a 16-year-old maker of electric vehicles run by an impetuous boss, the other a century-old conservative Japanese manufacturer.

Tesla manages the gigafactory but Panasonic is the principal partner, responsible for churning out cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells that Tesla buys and then packages into battery packs for the Model 3 sedan. The goal was to produce 35 gigawatt hours, or GWh, of cells per year by 2020, enough for roughly 400,000 Model 3s.

But two weeks ago, Osaka-based Panasonic shocked the investment community when the Nikkei newspaper reported that Tesla and Panasonic were freezing plans to expand capacity beyond the initial 35GWh amid concerns about Tesla’s sales.

“Panasonic is a 101-year-old company,” said Chris Redl, senior portfolio manager at Gordian Capital Japan. “It’s extremely rare for a Japanese company to publicly air its grievances about a top customer via a story in the Nikkei.”
Production Capacity

Musk said that Panasonic’s cell lines have actually constrained Model 3 assembly because they are operating at just two-thirds capacity, or 24GWh.

Panasonic did not directly respond to that assertion. But it said in a statement this week that as of the end of March the plant does have capacity for 35GWh. Both companies are in agreement that the gigafactory is far from running at full production. What’s less clear is why and how they will proceed in the future.

“Tesla won’t spend money on more capacity until existing lines get closer to 35GWh theoretical,” Musk said in a tweet.
Third Party

Most analysts said they believe slow Tesla sales warranted capping battery-production lines. But another explanation offered up is that Panasonic is unhappy about a third party possibly messing up their marriage. While it is currently Tesla’s only supplier of automotive-grade batteries, Tesla is building another factory -- known as Gigafactory Shanghai -- and has talked with several Chinese-based suppliers, including CATL.

“Tesla is starting to flirt with other battery makers in China, and Panasonic doesn’t like that,” said Sam Jaffe, managing director of battery consulting firm Cairn ERA.

Tesla declined to comment beyond Musk’s tweets. It has warned investors that it expects first quarter net income will be “negatively impacted” by lower than projected delivery volumes and multiple price cuts. Tesla is having an Autonomy Investor Day at its Palo Alto, California, headquarters April 22 and will report earnings April 24.
Past Problems

This isn’t the first time the two companies have struggled to match production lines. In a November interview with Bloomberg, Panasonic President Kazuhiro Tsuga said that in 2017, Panasonic held back while Tesla worked through problems in its automation line. Then in 2018, as car output ramped up, it was Panasonic who lagged. Tsuga said the output on both sides was close to being evenly matched in early November and two additional cell-production lines would be added.

The two companies are intertwined to a degree that any permanent split is likely out of the question, said analyst Irwin. Panasonic needs Tesla for the stability it brings to its battery business, he said, while “Tesla has nothing in batteries without Panasonic.”

Still, the now-public rift shows how Panasonic may be worried about Tesla’s future, said Kazunori Ito, an analyst at Morningstar Investment Services in Tokyo.

“With EV sales not growing as expected, Panasonic is increasingly unwilling to take risks," Ito said. “Where it used to be two companies sharing a common destiny, it’s clear that Panasonic wants to distance itself from Tesla, and Tsuga is beginning to draw a line. Musk cannot be happy about that.”

— With assistance by Yuki Furukawa

Have a confidential tip for our reporters?
GET IN TOUCH
Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE
Terms of Service Trademarks Privacy Policy ©2019 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved
Careers Made in NYC Advertise Ad Choices Contact Us Help