KJV Objectors

"I don't like the wording here (perhaps: 'minority source says...') but I'm forced to agree with the concept as expressed in the KJV."

"TR wasn't called that till later"
"KJV translators only had..."
These are simply irrelevant: what matters is whether the textual basis they DID use is correct, based on sound majority evidence.

"you should just use a Bible that 'speaks' to you."
NO! You should use one that is demonstrably accurate from sound majority evidence!

1 JOHN 5:7 early corruption as thoroughly justified by Burgon "Revision Revised"; objectors are still forced to agree with the concept.