Advertisement
peetaur

btrfs send ... what am I doing wrong?

Apr 6th, 2013
193
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.00 KB | None | 0 0
  1. btrfs send -v /.snapshots/446/snapshot | pv -r | btrfs rec -v /rootfullbackup/data
  2. ...
  3. [37.7MB/s]
  4. peter:~/xen # echo $?
  5. 0
  6. peter:~/xen # btrfs send -c /.snapshots/446/snapshot /.snapshots/453/snapshot | pv -r | btrfs rec /rootfullbackup/data/snapshot
  7. At subvol /.snapshots/453/snapshot
  8. At snapshot snapshot
  9. ERROR: open data/snapshot failed. No such file or directory
  10. [1.62MB/s]
  11. peter:~/xen # btrfs send -c /.snapshots/446/snapshot /.snapshots/453/snapshot | pv -r | btrfs rec /rootfullbackup/data/snapshot/
  12. .config/ backup/ boot/ etc/ lib/ mart mnt/ proc/ rootfullbackup/ sbin/ sys/ var/
  13. .readahead bin/ dev/ home/ lib64/ media/ mounts/ root/ run/ selinux/ usr/
  14. peter:~/xen # btrfs send -c /.snapshots/446/snapshot /.snapshots/453/snapshot | pv -r | btrfs rec /rootfullbackup/data
  15. At subvol /.snapshots/453/snapshot
  16. At snapshot snapshot
  17. ERROR: creating snapshot snapshot -> snapshot failed. File exists
  18. [1.38MB/s]
  19. peter:~/xen # sudo btrfs sub list / | tail
  20. ID 835 gen 32182 top level 5 path .snapshots/444/snapshot
  21. ID 836 gen 32282 top level 5 path .snapshots/445/snapshot
  22. ID 837 gen 32394 top level 5 path .snapshots/446/snapshot
  23. ID 838 gen 32459 top level 5 path .snapshots/447/snapshot
  24. ID 839 gen 32460 top level 5 path .snapshots/448/snapshot
  25. ID 840 gen 32510 top level 5 path .snapshots/449/snapshot
  26. ID 841 gen 32618 top level 5 path .snapshots/450/snapshot
  27. ID 842 gen 32732 top level 5 path .snapshots/451/snapshot
  28. ID 843 gen 32849 top level 5 path .snapshots/452/snapshot
  29. ID 844 gen 32966 top level 5 path .snapshots/453/snapshot
  30. peter:~/xen # sudo btrfs sub list /rootfullbackup/data/ | tail
  31. ID 256 gen 6 top level 5 path data
  32. ID 258 gen 200 top level 5 path data/snapshot
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. 2013-05-25 - I think the answer is that I should have used -p instead of -c in the incremental send. todo: test that
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement