Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 19th, 2018
91
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 0.30 KB | None | 0 0
  1. - 1 requires no sorting and is 25% faster than 2
  2. (sorting requires adding each row to a list, then copying the list to a vector of pointers, and then qsorting the vector)
  3. - 2,3,4 are basically equivalent
  4.  
  5. Conclusion:
  6. multiple column sorting has almost no overhead, but sorting has a 25% hit (for this use-case)
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment