SHOW:
|
|
- or go back to the newest paste.
1 | - | Re: http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-adds-another-40-cities-its-lte-roster |
1 | + | Re: http://www.droid-life.com/2014/04/23/att-announces-new-4g-lte-markets-rollout-to-complete-this-summer/ |
2 | ||
3 | - | Information retrieved on January 27, 2014 via http://maps.eng.t-mobile.com/ |
3 | + | Information retrieved on April 23, 2014 via http://maps.eng.t-mobile.com/ |
4 | ||
5 | Note: T-Mobile might be upgrading some of these areas, so their changes might not have been reflected on their coverage maps until these areas have been officially launched with the changes. | |
6 | Note 2: This comparison is only here to show how a lower-cost carrier with much less spectrum holds up to one with much more. | |
7 | - | Note 2: This comparison is only here to show how a lower-cost carrier with much less spectrum holds up to one with the most spectrum. |
7 | + | |
8 | ||
9 | Of the 6 new AT&T areas with LTE, T-Mobile has: | |
10 | - 1 LTE area | |
11 | - | Of the 55 new Sprint areas with LTE, T-Mobile has: |
11 | + | - 0 "4G" areas |
12 | - | - 27 LTE areas |
12 | + | - 1 3G area |
13 | - | - 6 "4G" areas |
13 | + | - 1 2G area |
14 | - | - 2 3G areas |
14 | + | - 3 roaming areas |
15 | - | - 15 2G areas |
15 | + | - 0 no service area |
16 | - | - 4 roaming areas |
16 | + | |
17 | - | - 1 no service area |
17 | + | So, of the 6 areas, 4 of them will have very poor data performance but seemingly fine voice/text coverage. |
18 | ||
19 | - | So, of the 55 areas, 20 of them will have pretty poor performance in general. |
19 | + | |
20 | - RM: Ketchikan, Alaska | |
21 | - LTE: Maui, Hawaii | |
22 | - | - 4G: Anderson, S.C. |
22 | + | - 2G: Cambridge, Ohio |
23 | - | - LTE: Camden, N.J. |
23 | + | - 3G: Meadville, Pa. |
24 | - | - LTE: Cape Girardeau, Mo. |
24 | + | - RM: Parkersburg, W. Va. |
25 | - | - 2G: Jackson, Mo. |
25 | + | |
26 | - | - LTE: Carson City, Nev. |
26 | + | |
27 | - | - LTE: Colorado Springs, Colo. |
27 | + |