API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

Ideas w/ Lynx

a guest
Jan 12th, 2017
127
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.66 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. [09:58] == Tryin [~qwebirc@2B1F1ECF.858E29C5.DD400B23.IP] has joined #lynxchan
  2. [09:58] <Tryin> Yo StephenLynx
  3. [09:59] <~StephenLynx> yo
  4. [09:59] == spicy [~spicy@CDBA8D6B:4455C60D:27B5EC52:IP] has quit []
  5. [10:00] <Tryin> StephenLynx: I have an Idea, what if each board in lynxchan have a *wiki and *booru?
  6. [10:00] <~StephenLynx> outside the software scope.
  7. [10:00] <Tryin> StephenLynx: That would be so convenient!
  8. [10:01] <~StephenLynx> it would cause a massive complexity overhead, not be as good as dedicated wiki and booru softwares while not actually contributing to users that want to use a chan.
  9. [10:02] <Tryin> StephenLynx: Is it possible to create an account agent that create an account for both the board and wiki while forking wiki software? That would be easy right?
  10. [10:03] <~StephenLynx> from the lynxchan side, yes.
  11. [10:03] <~StephenLynx> since it implements addons.
  12. [10:03] <~StephenLynx> to the wiki site, it would depend on what kind of access you have to it.
  13. [10:04] <Tryin> StephenLynx: lynxchan is javascript, right?
  14. [10:04] <~StephenLynx> yes
  15. [10:05] <Tryin> StephenLynx: nothing else but javascript?
  16. [10:05] <~StephenLynx> on the back-end, pure js.
  17. [10:11] <Tryin> StephenLynx: http://tiddlywiki.com/ is JS, but it is personal, not community-based
  18. [10:12] <Tryin> StephenLynx: http://dynalon.github.io/mdwiki/#!index.md also...
  19. [10:17] <~StephenLynx> what about these?
  20. [10:21] <Tryin> StephenLynx: Those are wiki software for single user
  21. [10:21] <~StephenLynx> hm
  22. [10:21] <~StephenLynx> ok, I got that
  23. [10:21] <~StephenLynx> but what about them?
  24. [10:24] <Tryin> StephenLynx: For imageboards, I would be great if the wiki is edited by users and maintained by board owners.
  25. [10:25] <~StephenLynx> I am not interested at all on wiki software and I don't think it would contribute at all with the chan experience.
  26. [10:25] <Tryin> StephenLynx: would this help make it? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Client_code https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Account_creation
  27. [10:26] <Tryin> StephenLynx: But i think it would, since there are lots of info going through /pol/ everyday
  28. [10:26] <~StephenLynx> for someone looking to integrate, I think so.
  29. [10:26] <~StephenLynx> I would use a separate wiki.
  30. [10:27] <~StephenLynx> I am not very knowledgeable on wikis, but I don't see a full integration working too well.
  31. [10:27] <Tryin> StephenLynx: I know it should be a separate wiki, since others have already made the software. But, the main problem is account creation and dual-login
  32. [10:28] <~StephenLynx> the thing is, most people posting don't create accounts.
  33. [10:29] <~StephenLynx> now, if I were to suggest an useful feature for everyone on that scenario
  34. [10:29] <~StephenLynx> would be adding the ability to add links to the wiki with the markdown.
  35. [10:29] <~StephenLynx> like >>XXX creates links to posts.
  36. [10:31] <Tryin> StephenLynx: Exactly! You are a genius!
  37. [10:31] <~StephenLynx> extending the markdown is a piece of cake in lynxchan, I can link you a couple of addons I wrote for markdown.
  38. [10:32] <~StephenLynx> https://gitgud.io/LynxChan/LynxChanAddon-OrangeText
  39. [10:33] <~StephenLynx> the thing is:
  40. [10:34] == OPrario [~Matokage@o.pior.orario] has quit [Quit: VLW FLW]
  41. [10:34] <~StephenLynx> for that to be used in practice, you'd need an wiki with actual content.
  42. [10:34] <~StephenLynx> otherwise people wouldn't have anything to link to
  43. [10:34] <~StephenLynx> or you could go the other way about it: implement this so the wiki would gain traction.
  44. [10:39] <Tryin> StephenLynx: I would say the latter
  45. [10:39] <Tryin> StephenLynx: Also, what about a mechanism that let threads that slipped go into a booru archive? https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru
  46. [10:39] <~StephenLynx> now
  47. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> there used to be archiving with lynxchan.
  48. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> up to 1.5
  49. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> the thing is
  50. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> with file deduplication on 1.6
  51. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> it became too much of a burden and I slashed the feature.
  52. [10:40] <~StephenLynx> now
  53. [10:41] <~StephenLynx> you could re-introduce it using addons, specially with a separate software
  54. [10:42] <~StephenLynx> you'd have to work with the part on deletionOps
  55. [10:42] <~StephenLynx> that prunes threads.
  56. [10:44] <Tryin> StephenLynx: Well what if we customize it so that threads that are not bumplocked, is active enough and pruned will be saved to the booru?
  57. [10:45] <~StephenLynx> yeah, you could check any parameters.
  58. [10:45] <~StephenLynx> how many replies it had, average of replies per hour.
  59. [10:46] <~StephenLynx> if you want to archive non-pruned threads, you could work with the reply code.
  60. [10:47] == StephenLynx [~StephenLy@Rizon-D4484188.user.veloxzone.com.br] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!