SW IRC on Official Artwork

Topic set by Mega on Wed Jan 02 2013 21:37:24 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
<Mousehunter321>: OmegaTyrant?
<OmegaTyrant>: hmm?
<Mousehunter321>: Could you undelete
<Mousehunter321>:
<Mousehunter321>: File talk:Slippy 64 3DS.png
<Jesse_Ventura>: Don't do it, lol.
<Jesse_Ventura>: That image is irrelevant.
*** Jesse_Ventura is now known as BNK
<BNK>: Seriously.
<BNK>: That's why I keep removing the assault image.
<Mousehunter321>: You only want to prevent it from being deleted because you agreed to the new artwork I uploaded, and are now reneging on your previous stance.
<Mousehunter321>: * undeleted
<BNK>: No I didn't.
<BNK>: My "stance" is no official artwork for NPCs.
<Mousehunter321>: Undelete the talk page and we'll see.
<Mousehunter321>: @ OmegaTyrant
<OmegaTyrant>: done
<BNK>: But for characters like Mario, we have new artwork.
<Mousehunter321>: "@Mousehunter: I can agree to official Assault artwork of Slippy being used."
<Mousehunter321>: quote unquote BNK
<BNK>: "@Mousehunter: I can agree to official Assault artwork of Slippy being used."
<BNK>: My stance has since changed.
<BNK>: As a matter of fact, the Assault artwork needs to be deleted.
<BNK>: Slippy isn't even an Assist Trophy.
<Mousehunter321>: So....why does the artwork need to be deleted?
<Mega>: Characters do not have to be Assist Trophies to gain official artwork, as shown by Mei Ling and such
<BNK>: Because it's not relevant?
<Mega>: However, those characters have only head appearances in the SSB series
<Mousehunter321>: How is not relevant?
<BNK>: Why can't we just get a screenshot of the codec with Mei Ling/Otacon/Colonel's face?
<Mega>: Still, being an Assist Trophy isn't enough of a reason to not have artwork
<BNK>: They have nothing to do with the series.
<BNK>: We aren't Nintendo Image Wiki
<Mousehunter321>: That said, they were considered notable enough to be included as trophies.
<BNK>: And doesn't Otacon have a sticker we could use?
<Mega>: So the point of having updated artwork for Link and other playable characters is relevant?
<Mega>: I'm fine with Pit getting it, he's the only one to use a redesign from Brawl, but Skyward Sword Link?
<BNK>: I agree with you Mega, of course we'll have to wait and see what Link will be in SSB4 to decide on Artwork.
<BNK>: Fox is also a problem.
<BNK>: Star Fox 64 3DS, that is to say remake, artwork isn't good.
<Mega>: And why doesn't Zelda have her Skyward Sword artwork?
<Mousehunter321>: BNK, provide the link to your "talk page archives".
<Mega>: I know it's blimmin different from the actual Zelda we have in Brawl, but still doesn't make a difference
<BNK>: No.
<BNK>: We don't need it Mega.
<Mega>: And Roy does?
<Mega>: Ike does?
<BNK>: wtf
<Mousehunter321>: So you refuse to provide evidence, yet claim that you're right?
<BNK>: Roy, where
<Mousehunter321>: BNK, provide the link to your "talk page archives".
<Mega>: It was established that the latest artwork of a character should be used, Zelda lacks the updated version
<Mousehunter321>: BNK, provide the link to your "talk page archives".
<Mega>: What talk page archives?
<Mousehunter321>: He undid my addition of the Slippy Toad artwork because of an "agreement" in his "talk page archives".
<BNK>: fixed Roy
<Mega>: http://www.ssbwiki.com/User_talk:Blue_Ninjakoopa/Archive_13
<Mega>: So uh as a general rule
<Mega>: Just glanced over it
<Mega>: BNK: You're ignoring  the fact that the Wiki decided on most modern artwork
<Mousehunter321>: Well...sudden change in stance.
<Mousehunter321>: By BNK
<Mega>: Roy still presents an issue
<Mega>: And Ike
<Mega>: Radical redesigns
<Mega>: But everyone else uses modern artwork