[8:12:22 PM] Char.: I think that siblings can't really be identical and if genes influence the personality then that doesn't matter anyway because we've got ancestors from the Stone Age whose features might be present in us
[8:12:43 PM] Char.: Our features aren't necessarily from our parents
[8:12:52 PM] Char.: Thus
[8:12:58 PM] Char.: Making us individuals
[8:13:09 PM] scout: So you side with nature as well?
[8:13:19 PM] Char.: And for this reason it's stupid to assume that the heir of a good ruler deserves his place after
[8:13:24 PM] Char.: I don't side with either
[8:13:32 PM] scout: Or more inclined, rather.
[8:13:47 PM] Char.: Despite both, people are interested in this because they want a factor of identity and significance
[8:14:05 PM] Char.: While what I'm saying is that individuals are different regardless of those two factors
[8:14:20 PM] Char.: We get random genes, but those genes expand to the past infinitely
[8:14:30 PM] scout: This reminded me of an essay I did on the good vs evil debate and whether or not we're born evil or good.
[8:14:32 PM] Char.: They're the effect of an infinite amount of causes
[8:14:39 PM] Char.: You get what I'm saying?
[8:14:42 PM] scout: Yes.
[8:14:51 PM] Char.: So from that infinity they can be anything
[8:15:10 PM] Char.: I think that most traits aren't due to nature OR nurture
[8:15:14 PM] Char.: But perception
[8:15:20 PM] Char.: Your interpretation of things
[8:15:58 PM] Char.: Also, no one is good or evil because those concepts don't exist as a whole
[8:16:06 PM] Char.: You can't define good or evil objectively