TV appearance = Validity?

I'm not saying -it is- her, but clearly fake in some way, either a supporter or herself. Not the first time a new-gen feminist would use this method to get her point across.

As for the tweet thing, while I do agree the incognito is a plausible and reasonable explanation, why 12sec from the tweet?

I don't know about return of kings, I only found it after google searching and I don't care as much for their content but after reading the article it was somewhat along my train of thoughts.

Don't get me wrong, I've just looked at other articles from their's and it's a lot of "the red-pill" type of bullshit. But it doesn't descredit some of the articles/writers. But the irony of "don't post male-only websites as reference, it's biased". Guess what all those SJW websites are.
How is using other sites than the resources given by SJW circular reasoning (saying the bible is true because the bible says so)?

I'm not saying there -aren't- any neckbeard trolls on the otherside either making fake accounts of feminists saying crazy shit to make a shit storm.

But no, "Tropes VS Women in video games" is far-fetched in most cases, out-right lying, and misleading of a serie. And by that, I don't mean that women aren't overly sexualized in videogames. But they representation of real-life in many cases, for examples she complains that Racing game have "race babes" before the races, or that sport-fight games have Ring girls.....like wtf. Or her complains about that one game where you're an undercover to stop a human-trafficking deal..which are horrible real-life scenarios (and your goal is to stop that). Or that time she spent 30min to edit a sidequest in Hitman to make it look like you're supposed to kill hookers. Or her completely missing the point of the BRILLIANT satire in GTAV, and saying that "Satire is still harmful because those words were placed in this order!". The complains of no women at the last E3, where actually Tomb Raider, Beyond and The last of us were presented...

Don't portray the greeks having women serving men, because...that's too close to reality. Don't portray women as being lower ranked than man in medieval society because...that's too close to reality. Don't portray women to dress slutty and/or have whores in ghetto ass areas of downtown big city (GTA) because....that's too close to reality.

Just tell us what we want to hear, because damn, we're insecure and love that sense of solidarity.

It started from a tiny crowd of minorities(not race) and the gullible people. Minorities do fishing for attention, gullible people...are gullible.
"omg I'm ugly", "no ur beautiful" and then start faking death threats and stuff. "If I get death threats then my point is valid" because <<logic>>. -REALLY- similar to how QC-Harajuku was, Marie-Ève Ouimette . Gamergate for example, even 4chan bannet it, you get powerful people that control the gullible ones, and all those that aren't don't get to speak where they have control/ties, soooo much like Qc-Harajuku was on a small scale.

And my problem with that isn't about feminism, trust me, I'd love for all games to never even feature a half-naked only nipple covering armor in my life, I'd even give up on any upcoming GTA games that I love just to see equality happening.
My problem is that it won't happen this way, all it does is make those "omg im ugly/qc-harajuku-esque" people think they are right to do what they do because people bite.

So let them be poney-kin and have special pronouns to call themselves with. I'll let you guys think about that while I stop responding to your posts, Nicolas and let you guys talk about what you guys want to talk about without disturbing you guys with my point of view.