Ratnawalli checkmated by examiner

Journal of Darshanie Ratnawalli vs. examiner
---------------------------

this woman is just worried that the subtle undercover racist project she, malinda and others just got a monopoly on is now hijacked by some stupid thugs to expose the whole stinking pit their ideologies and apologetic arguments emerge from. maybe who knows gnanasara was inspired by the writings of one of them? she just wants both respect and superiority at the same time, which is not possible because their racism is a daylight warfare now and is seen with disgust by the whole world, so even if they finally manage to establish the sinhala buddhist superiority it will be a disgusting one and this women doesn’t want herself being identified with that in such a case. a simple yes/no question would bring the truth out of her: would you accept a sri lanka where all ethnicities are given equal status, all four religions equal status and all three languages be equal in status and this is guaranteed in writing through the constitution? that’s a check mate!

examiner - May 9, 2013
6:58 am
---

Freud would envy you. Wow.

darshanie ratnawalli - May 9, 2013
11:34 am
---
commentary: ratnawalli's sleep was disturbed with examiner's checkmate. so she decides to write the following:
---
“would you accept a sri lanka where all ethnicities are given equal status, all four religions equal status and all three languages be equal in status and this is guaranteed in writing through the constitution? that’s a check mate!”

Greetings from my planet where there is already a Sri Lanka where all ethnicities are given equal status. Different in your planet? This is how parallel worlds work. Small details differ. Is Princess Diana still alive in your world?

In Sri Lanka of my planet all four religions do not yet have equal status. I have a friend though from a parallel world where there is a Sri Lanka in which all religions are given equal status. But he-she (that world is so advanced that gender is abolished) tells me that this happened only a thousand years after the Church of England lost the foremost place in England. Considering that the Lankan Buddhist Church is older by about a thousand years than the Church of England, this seems roughly acceptable to me.(that the older church with deeper roots into the collective psyche of the Nation should take longer to disentangle itself from the foremost place)

Language…umm must look among my parallel world case histories when English and French and Spanish became equal in USA to set a benchmark on when the trend is likely to reach our world.

It’s all like seasons you know, they follow a consistent pattern, it has to dawn, has to be timely. You can’t Caesar the season into being in isolated pockets of the world.

darshanie ratnawalli - May 9, 2013
1:35 pm
---

first of all my question was a yes/no one. anyway, it’s not wrong you took some extra space, but a yes/no at the end would have been helpful :D

look how high this woman could jump when she could say ethnicities *are* guaranteed equal places by constitution. and she needs the west is war mongers and war criminals so it’s not wrong if we are the same too argument in three paragraphs to talk about religions and languages!

my question was not about whether the constitution *already* provides equal status for all (races, religions, languages) in the planet you live. the question was:
“Would you be able to get a good night’s sleep if that is the case?”

you said Freud would envy me, but your yes/no answer (bluff) speaks for itself! there must have been a reason i called it a check mate, right? :P

P.S.: do not misuse metaphors when you are not familiar with the field of their origins – people don’t mix up planets and parallel worlds, it doesn’t work like that. That way you sound more like dharmawardane (refering to his electricity tariff post :D )

examiner - May 10, 2013
12:03 am
---

You could stupid. If my planet Earth was different to your planet Earth, they would be two parallel worlds. They would also be two different planets located in two parallel universes. When I say my planet, your planet does not have to be Jupiter. It could be an alternate Earth.

To give an example; You are actually from another planet, an alternate/parallel Earth where some woman has told you in this comment space that ‘ethnicities *are* guaranteed equal places by constitution’ and given you ‘the west is war mongers and war criminals so it’s not wrong if we are the same too argument’ in three paragraphs.

In my planet Earth, the only woman who has replied to you on this space is ME. And my argument was bigger (bigger perhaps than you could summarize given the scope of your language). You should read some parallel world fiction. It would give you a better grasp of the concept and the reading would improve your writing skills.

darshanie ratnawalli - May 10, 2013
4:14 pm
---

…and the answer was?

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

about your parallel world metaphor, congratulations on your understanding, yet it’s not fashionable to mix up planets and parallel worlds, coz they have historically been seperate ideas to be used as metaphors. just don’t go too overboard quoting something when you learn new ideas – shows your noobness when we see that in every paragraph. this is not a family guy show to see parallel world annoyance from the beginning to the end – read your comments once again if i sound wrong :D

examiner - May 10, 2013
9:44 pm
---

Sometimes in life you come across people so uncouth, that dealing with them moves beyond annoying to almost delicious. You are one such ‘experience’. So deliciously uncouth and ignorant that …you become compelling. Your delusions of grandeur could definitely do with some chemical corrective measures. They have apparently gotten so great that you who have obviously never written and published anything to judge by your language, dare to lecture to me about what’s fashionable and not fashionable to do in metaphors.

What would you know about metaphors, you who write malapropisms like ‘noobness’ and ‘family guy show’, ‘parallel world annoyance’ without the slightest self consciousness? Look up the word ‘malapropism’ it will be a very educative for you.

And you with your garden variety, mediocre intellect go beyond ridiculous and become scintillating when you dare to stereotype me as someone who is just learning new ideas and taking my first baby steps in writing (just because i look gorgeous).

Try not to be so in your face uncouth. Might be difficult but worth a try. As a first step

Go to http://www.nation.lk/edition/columns/painted-goose-dharshanie-ratnawalli.html

also for a longer article where I use the parallel worlds concept see http://ratnawalli.blogspot.com/2011/05/day-i-felt-acute-distaste-for-drdayan_01.html

Darshanie Ratnawalli - May 11, 2013
10:02 am
---

…and the answer was?

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

i’ll see if i get some time to respond to your rant, but i’ve got a huge backlog for the weekend already.

examiner - May 12, 2013
12:15 am
---

from your discomfort with the language that i use on internet forums, i think that you need to spend some more time on the internet interacting with people and learn their jargon which is more effective than the thesaurus that you pretend to be. the fashion that you seem to know is not one that suits this place. i wouldn’t have ‘lectured’ you if you didn’t start ‘lecturing’ people, like in your comment on May 6, and try to dodge my question and instead write essays in response to my P.S. (it’s funny to see that what i did is termed as lecturing in your dictionary or that’s how the lectures you receive in your real life are?). shows your ego is hurt, sorry.

i do not write newspaper columns or blog posts and would never carry any of it as my magnum opus. if you want to read what i write, one of the preliminary requirements would be a graduate level understanding of topics in applied mathematics ranging from vector calculus to discrete mathematics, computer languages and predicate logic, in all of which, the message, the clarity and the logical flow of ideas are more important (in other words, the readability and the successful comprehension) than pretending to be an entertaining writer. (a wise man once told me that substance in the end pays back more than the pretentious presentation.) I will safely assume that you have no clue of any of the above and will further affirm my belief about my intellect because, being a Sri Lankan, i certainly outperformed you in my high school tests in order not to end up writing columns on newspapers aiming at a career to sing for somebody to earn my supper or to write fairy tales. for your entertainment i would give you a piece of writing from one of the genres i enjoy: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f5/Principia_Mathematica_theorem_54-43.png

in the meantime, i do enjoy art and respect artists. i consider myself a fan of a large number of popular authors and movie makers. i never found a single artist that i admire to have even a bit of arrogance that you do. the number is engough to be more than ‘few’, and certainly you are no match to a single one of them. I wish that’s the case even in the strangest of the universes, technicalities prevent it. i didn’t read your rant about dayan because i can already see, from how you respond to a simple question, what’s going to be there in your acute distaste. i had a peak earlier at a child’s tricks demanding dharmawardana’s undue attention. play your tricks to somebody else to get views for your blog. people will judge you from your comment full of parallel worlds.

you lost the game, now go find a pen name. or shamelessly write another article to respond to a commenter while you could have done it in the comments section itself. that will also help you with one more line in the list of ‘publications’ (reader reviewed!) in your CV. sorry about the lengthy write-up. lets not meet again. wish you some enlightenment.

examiner - May 13, 2013
3:58 am
---

sorry i mean your comment on May 7 not May 6.

examiner - May 13, 2013
4:31 am

---------------------
commentary: that's how Darshanie Ratnawalli was placed on a checkmate for more than three days and finally declared defeated. she couldn't utter the words "i'm not racist". instead she took up an arrogant, stubborn position to defend what some observers now named incognito racism till defeat and beyond.
----------------------
Footnote: it all started with a reply Darshanie Ratnawalli wrote in response to

Sujewa Ekanayake - May 7, 2013
9:37 am

which reads as follows:

oh you got past the headline and the photograph and got through the first para? So proud of you my boy. Read on. The good parts are yet to come.

Para 3- I talk of the need to silence the pangs of allegiance towards BBS, Excited?
Para 5- I call the BBS degenerate, debased, degrading; (happy?)
Last Para- I refer to the metaphorical excrement dumped by the BBS onto the social fabric. (Salivating now?)
If you manage to read up to the third endnote…. ah

darshanie ratnawalli - May 7, 2013
5:51 pm
--------------------------------------------