Advertisement
Guest User

gradle

a guest
Oct 19th, 2015
194
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.96 KB | None | 0 0
  1. warning: Ignoring InnerClasses attribute for an anonymous inner class
  2. (org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.tool.SchemaCodeGenerator$1) that doesn't come with an
  3. associated EnclosingMethod attribute. This class was probably produced by a
  4. compiler that did not target the modern .class file format. The recommended
  5. solution is to recompile the class from source, using an up-to-date compiler
  6. and without specifying any "-target" type options. The consequence of ignoring
  7. this warning is that reflective operations on this class will incorrectly
  8. warning: Ignoring InnerClasses attribute for an anonymous inner class
  9. indicate that it is *not* an inner class.
  10. (com.bea.xml.stream.util.CircularQueue$1) that doesn't come with an
  11. this warning is that reflective operations on this class will incorrectly
  12. going on.
  13. This is often due to inadvertently including a core library file
  14. building an application, then be forewarned that your application
  15. Eclipse). If you are sure you're not intentionally defining a
  16. core class, then this is the most likely explanation of what's
  17. distribution, as opposed to compiling an application -- then use
  18. conflict with core system classes. JarJar is a tool that may help
  19. when not building a core library.
  20. in your application's project, when using an IDE (such as
  21. associated EnclosingMethod attribute. This class was probably produced by a
  22. prepared for angry customers who find, for example, that your
  23. your own package namespace. This means that they will never be in
  24. will still fail to build or run, at some point. Please be
  25. application ceases to function once they upgrade their operating
  26. from a non-Android virtual machine project. This will most
  27. system. You will be to blame for this problem.
  28. solution is to recompile the class from source, using an up-to-date compiler
  29. that is an indication that the path you are on will ultimately
  30. core package, then the easiest safe alternative you have is to
  31. lead to pain, suffering, grief, and lamentation.
  32. assuredly not work. At a minimum, it jeopardizes the
  33. and without specifying any "-target" type options. The consequence of ignoring
  34. Ill-advised or mistaken usage of a core class (java.* or javax.*)
  35. However, you might actually be trying to define a class in a core
  36. It is also often of questionable legality.
  37. repackage that code. That is, move the classes in question into
  38. If you really intend to build a core library -- which is only
  39. namespace, the source of which you may have taken, for example,
  40. indicate that it is *not* an inner class.
  41. trouble processing "javax/xml/XMLConstants.class":
  42. If you are legitimately using some code that happens to be in a
  43. If you go ahead and use "--core-library" but are in fact
  44. compatibility of your app with future versions of the platform.
  45. you in this endeavor. If you find that you cannot do this, then
  46. appropriate as part of creating a full virtual machine
  47. the "--core-library" option to suppress this error message.
  48. compiler that did not target the modern .class file format. The recommended
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement