Guest User

GCW Atari initial discussion

a guest
Mar 9th, 2013
300
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 12.47 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [17:33] <cryo_> Buy Atari... OK! http://www.fundable.com/reset-atari
  2. [17:36] <Surkow|laptop> that was quick
  3. [17:36] <Surkow|laptop> :D
  4. [17:36] <Surkow|laptop> it was only just posted
  5. [17:39] <Vysse> Hey boys
  6. [17:39] <Vysse> I left one day and what a big new I miss
  7. [17:40] <Vysse> This Atari thing it's crazy
  8. [17:40] <Surkow|laptop> :D
  9. [17:40] <Surkow|laptop> see, progress
  10. [17:41] <Vysse> I will have to read it better and deeper the agreement but I don't get where will the founds of the bid will come from
  11. [17:42] <Vysse> I read roller coaster tycoon and Baldur's Gate :D
  12. [17:44] <Surkow|laptop> you invest money, just like with kickstarter
  13. [17:44] <Vysse> Oh
  14. [17:44] <Vysse> I see
  15. [17:44] <Vysse> Which is the minimum goal
  16. [17:45] <Vysse> I assume the competence will make huge bids
  17. [17:45] <Surkow|laptop> competitors, yes
  18. [17:45] <Surkow|laptop> so it might fail
  19. [17:46] <Vysse> Is this the big agreement u talked of zear?
  20. [17:46] <zear> what big agreement i talked about?
  21. [17:46] <Surkow|laptop> so we need you guys to invest ;)
  22. [17:46] <Surkow|laptop> anyone who missed out on a unit
  23. [17:46] <Surkow|laptop> can invest and receive a unit
  24. [17:47] <Vysse> U said something about u know big news to come that you couldn't reveal yet
  25. [17:47] <Vysse> Which is the minimum to succeed?
  26. [17:47] <Surkow|laptop> I have no idea
  27. [17:48] <Vysse> I mean like the kickstarter
  28. [17:48] <Vysse> Interesting and detailed info of the project here
  29. [17:48] <zear> Vysse, oh i didn't know about that
  30. [17:49] <Vysse> It seems the Gcw can be upgraded?
  31. [17:49] <Vysse> the GCW play non-Atari games?
  32. [17:49] <Vysse> Yes. The GCW is capable of playing games from virtually all legacy systems and will be upgraded to support those systems as we develop and enhance the software. It’s a very extensible device.
  33. [17:49] <zear> justin surprised us all
  34. [17:49] <Vysse> " the GCW play non-Atari games?
  35. [17:49] <Vysse> Yes. The GCW is capable of playing games from virtually all legacy systems and will be upgraded to support those systems as we develop and enhance the software. It’s a very extensible device."
  36. [17:49] <Vysse> Ok
  37. [17:49] <zear> i was talking about known commercial games that were ported to GCW, but we await the authors' agreement before we can announce them
  38. [17:49] <Vysse> I am quoting the webpage
  39. [17:49] <Surkow|laptop> so this is not about the library of atari ;)
  40. [17:49] <Vysse> Ok
  41. [17:50] <Vysse> I would like to know more about the commercial games then :)
  42. [17:52] <Vysse> Oh, I see. The goal is 250K$
  43. [17:56] <Vysse> Where are Juan and Percuei to lucubrate about the deal
  44. [17:57] <Surkow|laptop> what does that even mean D:
  45. [18:01] <Vysse> To discuss and show their opinion.
  46. [18:02] <Vysse> I'm in a very long and boring bus trip right now, that's all xD
  47. [18:04] <GCW> more news in about an hour or so
  48. [18:04] <GCW> two more computers will be legit and licensed for the gcw
  49. [18:04] <GCW> finishing up licensing deal now
  50. [18:05] <GCW> and a old game studio license deal for their old titles
  51. [18:06] <Vysse> Wow. Buzzing night
  52. [18:06] <Vysse> Buzzling
  53. [18:07] <GCW> been working on this since Feb 28th hence reason I was not here
  54. [18:10] <GCW> I really want to make this console great and emulation legal for multiple emulators
  55. [18:14] <Vysse> You have to be clear differencing the KS campaign from the fundable one. I have already seen some confused users on the boards that think their ks payments will also be used for the license purchase
  56. [18:14] <GCW> what boards
  57. [18:15] <Vysse> And spanish one haha
  58. [18:15] <GCW> well clarify for me ;)
  59. [18:15] <Vysse> Don't worry, I'll try to clarify it
  60. [18:16] <GCW> the funable is seperate and no KS money is being used in this endeavor. The KS money is being used for purchase of pledge prizes and production of the GCW Zero
  61. [18:18] <Vysse> Just copy this message in K's. Just for not feeding our apocalyptic fans ;)
  62. [18:19] <Juan> Big log, what did I miss
  63. [18:19] <Juan> Hey Vysse
  64. [18:19] <johnnyonflame> Vysse they'll be fed out of nothing tbh
  65. [18:19] <johnnyonflame> these people search for reasons to be all scared for
  66. [18:20] <johnnyonflame> and they find it in places no other person would, for no reason
  67. [18:20] <Vysse> Good night Juan
  68. [18:21] <Juan> Hey everyone I didn't say hey to.
  69. [18:21] <Surkow|laptop> hi ;)
  70. [18:21] <Juan> Hi Surkow|laptop, are you new here
  71. [18:21] <Surkow|laptop> only today
  72. [18:21] <Juan> ;>
  73. [18:21] <Surkow|laptop> tomorrow I'm old
  74. [18:22] <j-live> so what did i miss?
  75. [18:22] <Surkow|laptop> atari bidding
  76. [18:22] <j-live> gcw has the funds to attempt to aquire atari's software library?
  77. [18:22] <Vysse> A new quad core gcw for 2015 =D
  78. [18:22] <Surkow|laptop> not enough, that's why you invest ;)
  79. [18:23] <Juan> Did atari ever develop any good first party games
  80. [18:23] <Juan> Most 2600 games I can think of are published by activision
  81. [18:24] <GCW> alot where by them also
  82. [18:24] <GCW> asteroids
  83. [18:24] <GCW> pong
  84. [18:24] <GCW> space invaders
  85. [18:24] <Juan> POng? REally?
  86. [18:24] <Surkow|laptop> ;)
  87. [18:24] <Juan> I thought space invaders was made by taito
  88. [18:25] <GCW> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atari_2600_games
  89. [18:25] <Juan> keystone kapers is all you need
  90. [18:25] <GCW> taito licensed it from Atari
  91. [18:25] <Juan> Sure it wasn't the other way around?
  92. [18:26] <GCW> Pretty sure
  93. [18:30] <Mmmonster> and if you get the licenses, these games will be payed ?
  94. [18:31] <Surkow|laptop> yes
  95. [18:31] <Surkow|laptop> but the investors receive 20 games
  96. [18:35] <RodrigoCard> just read the update #26, Wow, I dont know what top think...
  97. [18:35] <Surkow|laptop> ;)
  98. [18:35] <GCW> and a console
  99. [18:36] <jxv> I just read it too.
  100. [18:36] <jxv> RodrigoCard said it right.
  101. [18:37] <Juan> I just read it
  102. [18:37] <Juan> and
  103. [18:37] <Juan> o_O
  104. [18:40] <Mmmonster> galaga is from atari ?
  105. [18:40] <Juan> Namco
  106. [18:41] <Mmmonster> yep but it appears in the video of the reset of atari
  107. [18:44] <Mmmonster> the idea of buying atari rights seems great....but from now on, will you try to ban emulators of systems that you do not have the rights ?
  108. [18:44] <Tanistass> What about the acquisition of Sega licenses Justin has mentioned in the ks update?
  109. [18:44] <Tanistass> Nice question, mmmonster
  110. [18:44] * Juan just wants his oss friendly handheld
  111. [18:49] <GCW> why would I ban anything
  112. [18:49] <GCW> it's open source
  113. [18:49] <GCW> any one can develop for GCW
  114. [18:50] <DMackey> \o/
  115. [18:52] <Mmmonster> if you sell an emulator and others give it for free...that doesn't seems right for you. Especially if you payed the rights of the system. If i was you, i would be pissed off.
  116. [18:52] <Juan> wha
  117. [18:53] <johnnyonflame> Mmmonster, shit happens
  118. [18:53] <johnnyonflame> fighting shit with shit is bad
  119. [18:53] <Juan> Who's selling an emulator
  120. [18:53] <Tanistass> Excuse for my ignorance but this movement seems a little bit paradoxical to me, buying a game license from an open source company it implies you are theoretically killing the intellectual right of those titles and you can edit them as much as you want
  121. [18:54] <Surkow|laptop> <Mmmonster> the idea of buying atari rights seems great....but from now on, will you try to ban emulators of systems that you do not have the rights ?
  122. [18:54] <Surkow|laptop> we cannot advertise
  123. [18:55] <Surkow|laptop> with games we haven't licensed
  124. [18:55] <Surkow|laptop> hence, even though emulation is legal
  125. [18:55] <Surkow|laptop> we cannot use any game intellectual property
  126. [18:55] <Surkow|laptop> maybe fair use
  127. [18:55] <Surkow|laptop> but not more
  128. [18:55] <Juan> But aren't you doing that just now
  129. [18:55] <Juan> Associating the zero to this campaign
  130. [18:56] <Surkow|laptop> oh
  131. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> good one
  132. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> :D
  133. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> but they are for sale
  134. [18:57] <Juan> And?
  135. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> so they aren't able to sue us
  136. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> you don't sue prospective buyers
  137. [18:57] <Juan> The future holder could
  138. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> hmm
  139. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> only after we fail
  140. [18:57] <Mmmonster> i only see two perks of buying atari rights...1-you can have legal games on gcw or future consoles 2- you can profit if some1 try to do a remake of old games...something like tempest 2015
  141. [18:57] <Surkow|laptop> or well
  142. [18:58] <Surkow|laptop> GCW
  143. [18:58] <Surkow|laptop> hmm, yes
  144. [18:58] <Surkow|laptop> remakes are possible
  145. [18:58] <Mmmonster> ok surkow your reasoning seems fair to me
  146. [18:58] <Juan> Also, new console for 2015
  147. [18:58] <Juan> isn't that like
  148. [18:58] <Juan> bullshit
  149. [18:58] <Surkow|laptop> hmm
  150. [18:59] <Surkow|laptop> just think of it as this
  151. [18:59] <Surkow|laptop> GCW is the company
  152. [18:59] <Surkow|laptop> we are a group of developers who have no hardware control
  153. [18:59] <Surkow|laptop> work is done for the current hardware
  154. [18:59] <GCW> hardware is my field how is console in 2015 unbelievable
  155. [18:59] <Juan> Shouldn't you be mad then, money going to buy licenses instead of funding further development
  156. [19:00] <Surkow|laptop> hmmm
  157. [19:00] <Surkow|laptop> most work that has been done so far
  158. [19:00] <Surkow|laptop> is done pro bono
  159. [19:00] <Juan> I mean, I could just have waited for a cheaper chinese clone but I thought it was better to support the project and get some money for the devs
  160. [19:00] <Surkow|laptop> so all development until now has been done because we want to contribute to the community
  161. [19:02] <GCW> Licensing equals more software legit legal emulation
  162. [19:03] <Mmmonster> ok one more question...suppose that you buy atari rights and if you developed an emulator of an atari system. will you give it away for free ?
  163. [19:03] <GCW> and more funds to support development and paying of the developers
  164. [19:03] <GCW> the emulator is always free
  165. [19:04] <GCW> that won't change if we get license
  166. [19:04] <RodrigoCard> So, at last initially, is to offer 'legal' Atari ROMs for a fixed price?
  167. [19:05] <GCW> yes
  168. [19:05] <GCW> then eventually release then as Free Domain
  169. [19:05] <RodrigoCard> without disallowing 'illegal' ones?
  170. [19:05] <Mmmonster> ok...that is good enough for me....i will support you at ks because i want to help the comunity as well
  171. [19:06] <GCW> I'm not gonna go around sueing if that is what you mean
  172. [19:06] <RodrigoCard> not what I mean
  173. [19:07] <GCW> everyone has to make a choice to support legal emulation and legal roms or choose to not pay and download illegal ones
  174. [19:07] <RodrigoCard> I thought about something more like disallow atari emulators in a official 'app store' or something like that
  175. [19:08] <Mmmonster> but as you might know...many of us already payed these games long time ago...should we pay for them again ?
  176. [19:08] <RodrigoCard> Well, CHOICE is good! :)
  177. [19:09] <RodrigoCard> Mmmonster : Well, nobody will stop you from using your existing romset on your GCW zero :)
  178. [19:11] <Mmmonster> i know...and i already said it that i will support this project...i was just thinking out loud :D
  179. [19:13] <Tanistass> I also be more interesting to give the funds to hardware and software developers in order to simplify and attract indie developers
  180. [19:15] <zear> it would be perfect if the acquiring of Atari IP could later lead to us getting IP or just re-selling other people's roms
  181. [19:15] <zear> so an appstore where you can buy roms for any platform
  182. [19:15] <zear> and you get them in their original form
  183. [19:15] <zear> that you can use on any device, with any emulator
  184. [19:15] <zear> unlike that crap you sometimes see in the stores, "30 classic SEGA games, all embedded in an .exe"
  185. [19:16] <RodrigoCard> So, a non-nintendo Virtual Console. :)
  186. [19:18] <zear> except that you can reuse your rom on any other platform
  187. [19:18] <Mmmonster> i think it s impossible to have a romstore with many roms.... the gamegadget tried to have one, and failed
  188. [19:19] <RodrigoCard> did gamegadget roms have drm?
  189. [19:20] <Surkow|laptop> I don't think they did
  190. [19:20] <Mmmonster> if i remember they have some kind of protection...
  191. [19:21] <GCW> All previous Kickstarter pledgers and early adopters will also get this set of 20 Atari games if successful in our bid for Atari.
  192. [19:21] <Mmmonster> but their protection was rubbish
  193. [19:22] <[JJ]Albert> GCW: what's this about atari?
  194. [19:23] <freakazoid0223> I guess the bid is for the part that wants to break away anyway?
  195. [19:23] <[JJ]Albert> Hold on, a bid for a large company?
  196. [19:23] <[JJ]Albert> Someone explain.
  197. [19:23] <Mmmonster> http://www.fundable.com/reset-atari#profile
  198. [19:24] <cryo_> it is exactly whast it sounds like you missed the two hour discussion we just had :)
  199. [19:27] <Tanistass> Oh, I think I missed the first part. Give us 5 cents lol
  200. [19:27] <Tanistass> Plz
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment