Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Oct 7th, 2015
80
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.33 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 17:24 <•lauren_istlare> Do you think it would be petty of us to ask people that are 'vacationing' from Eve i.e. skill queuing online in highsec while they continue to be part of the community (i.e. people like Gell, Moxy, Django) not to have a slot in group pos's?
  2. 17:27 <•robnik_w> honestly I'm inclined to just boot inactives and welcome them back when they're ready to play eve online again
  3. 17:28 <•robnik_w> i realize that's probably too harsh but that is the way I *want* to run things
  4. 17:28 <•lauren_istlare> the problem with booting them all together is they lose auth, and thus discuss
  5. 17:29 <•robnik_w> i think that's fine, that's what #public is for
  6. 17:29 <•lauren_istlare> django plays a lot of hero of the storm with annah and such, and they use the other channels on irc and ts
  7. 17:29 <•lauren_istlare> he would lose both of those.
  8. 17:29 <•robnik_w> well that seems like something we should fix with TS
  9. 17:30 <•robnik_w> our Other Games channel doesn't need to be auth'd
  10. 17:30 <•lauren_istlare> we could look into whether like an 'alumni' status is possible
  11. 17:30 <•robnik_w> yeah, i'd be okay with that. i'd rather purge down to 70 toons if I knew all of them were active rather than have a bunch of inactives in corp
  12. 17:31 <•lauren_istlare> our previous definition of inactive was - no kills and not in the community. If we shrunk that down to - no kills, it'd be far smaller.
  13. 17:32 <•robnik_w> each inactive is one more person leaking api keys, one more possible character sale, one more artificial inflation of our numbers that looks us unengageable, one more dude not paying attention to wardecs and gets popped, one more person making casual driveby bittervet comments in #discuss or whatever
  14. 17:33 <•robnik_w> i personally like PVP minimums v0v
  15. 17:33 <•robnik_w> the only two people entitled to stay in sound despite inactivity are PA and Xqu imo
  16. 17:33 <•robnik_w> errr, in RITES, that is
  17. 17:35 <•robnik_w> if we want to do legit pvp mimimums then let's think about it a bit and then send out a notice
  18. 17:35 <•lauren_istlare> Okay.
  19. 17:35 <•lauren_istlare> I'm gonna update my inactivity sheet anyway.
  20. 17:36 <•davdak_auscent> lauren_istlare: I made one yesterday if you want to put actual dates in
  21. 17:38 <•lauren_istlare> thanks. i'm just using your inactivity tab for logins, and doing kbs for the rest :)
  22. 17:38 <•robnik_w> like those dudes we fought on Sunday brought a bunch of T3s and bhaalgorns and two triage because they looked on our killboard and saw a 350-man alliance during primetime weekend. can't blame em. if they saw what we actually are (a 150-200 man alliance) then they might not have been so overly cautious. bloat is no good.
  23. 17:38 <•robnik_w> people overestimate you, compensate, and then you get dunked because you dont live up to expectations
  24. 17:39 <•lauren_istlare> rites is currently 60 mains. i'll tell you in a while how many of those are actually pvping
  25. 17:39 <•robnik_w> it should be about 40-45, which is pretty good i think
  26. 17:39 <•robnik_w> i dont think we have THAT many inactives
  27. 17:46 ⇐ •robnik_w quit • robnik_ → •robnik
  28. 18:38 <•robnik> ever get a final number lauren_istlare ?
  29. 18:38 <•lauren_istlare> i went to get dinner, i'm nearly done. i don't think you're gonna like it tho
  30. 18:53 <•lauren_istlare> robnik: 32
  31. 18:53 <•robnik> lauren_istlare, counting from when?
  32. 18:54 <•lauren_istlare> at least 1 kill since 1st September, just over 5 weeks ago
  33. 18:56 <•lauren_istlare> if you take it back to the 1st august, it goes up to 42. All the rest have no kills since july
  34. 18:56 <•lauren_istlare> or earlier
  35. 18:57 <•lauren_istlare> i have to say i'm pretty disappointed. i knew it had been quiet in eutz, but i didn't realise it was across the board.
  36. 18:59 <•lauren_istlare> the big question is, what should we do about it :/
  37. 19:00 <•robnik> we do our thing and purge on nov 1.
  38. 19:00 <•robnik> if we go down to 32 mains, so be it
  39. 19:00 <•robnik> 30 kills over 60 days, i think, is our pvp minimum
  40. 19:03 <•lauren_istlare> red is no pvp for over 2 months (july and before), orange for pvp in august (1 month), green for this month (september )
  41. 19:03 <•lauren_istlare> like, thats a lot of red :S
  42. 19:10 <•lauren_istlare> Okay so i want to boot vayren and errynn. The others are.. debatable
  43. 19:10 <•lauren_istlare> is that ok?
  44. 19:11 <•robnik> vayren is lordchaos' friend
  45. 19:11 <•lauren_istlare> vayren literally joined on 28th august, came to j*, and logged out. No kills, no communications, nothing for over a month
  46. 19:13 <•lauren_istlare> i could make a case that lorchaos basically did the same thing, by joining then going afk. But he got on one killmail before he went afk
  47. 20:01 <•lauren_istlare> i am sensing you do'nt want to kick people robnik :P
  48. 20:03 <•robnik> baby in one hand... kb in other... sry
  49. 20:04 <•robnik> will respond when she chills
  50. 20:04 <•lauren_istlare> np :)
  51. 20:06 <•robnik> alright so basically I think we should say that everyone's got until nov. 1 to get 30 kills between sept and oct, or face the purifying fire sword of the purgeoning
  52. 20:07 <•robnik> let's give folks a little advance notice. it'll ruffle some feathers, again, but we're a pvp corp and we keep picking up all these damn carebears
  53. 20:07 <•robnik> you can be incredibly casual and pick up 30 kills if you log in _at all_
  54. 20:07 <•robnik> esp over 2 months
  55. 20:08 <•robnik> if we go down to 30 mains, that's fine
  56. 20:09 <•lauren_istlare> so 30 killmails from the 60 day period of 1 sep to 1 nov ?
  57. 20:09 <•robnik> yes
  58. 20:09 <•robnik> or 20, or 40, whaever
  59. 20:09 <•robnik> i dont know exactly what th enumber needs to be
  60. 20:09 <•lauren_istlare> should we make exceptions for people that fly heavily in logi?
  61. 20:10 <•robnik> no, if they're worried about it they can bring dps drone
  62. 20:11 <•robnik> is 30 too much?
  63. 20:12 <•lauren_istlare> I just checked mine. I have between 200-300 per month, ~70 each on the two months I only logged in once a week
  64. 20:12 <•lauren_istlare> But then again, I'm not sure I'm a good measuring stick.
  65. 20:12 <•robnik> i'm looking
  66. 20:12 <•robnik> 30 might be too much
  67. 20:12 <•robnik> let's do 20
  68. 20:12 <•robnik> which is a total joke
  69. 20:12 <•robnik> but w/e
  70. 20:13 <•lauren_istlare> I definitely agree that, 'last kill' is not an accurate representation of activity. Because, people pop a shuttle and are safe for two months, in the current system :S
  71. 20:13 <•robnik> yes
  72. 20:13 <•lauren_istlare> I don't think 20 is too much. I would be happy to make exceptions for people that post in AFK within the last month though
  73. 20:14 <•lauren_istlare> Eg. (I will be busy this month because of work), is good for this month, but more than 2-3 months of that and i'll get ansy
  74. 20:14 <•robnik> 20 kills means that you'd need to have been on about 1.5% of RITES' total kills over the last two months
  75. 20:14 <•lauren_istlare> I like people that post in AFK thread
  76. 20:14 <•robnik> yes
  77. 20:14 <•lauren_istlare> Are you happy to include any killmails, including mtu's ?
  78. 20:15 <•robnik> yes
  79. 20:15 <•robnik> hell i'll include non-pve lossmails too
  80. 20:16 <•lauren_istlare> because it's extremely easy to scan a couple of mtu's down in Day and pop them. You get a suspect timer but /o\ but you can just warp to the hole.
  81. 20:16 <•lauren_istlare> Ah. I said 'killmails'. Are we including loss mails too :P
  82. 20:16 <•robnik> sure. i mostly just want folks participating
  83. 20:17 <•robnik> i dunno, maybe that's rewarding failure
  84. 20:17 <•lauren_istlare> Okay. Well this is an opportunity to plug the corp sma. They can, theoretically, borrow a slasher, go blow it up, get SRP, fit another, blow it up, get SRP etc, without having needed to make that initial outlay of isk
  85. 20:17 <•robnik> yep
  86. 20:20 <•lauren_istlare> I'm a bit torn. On one hand, I don't want to encourage people to blow up 20 slashers to fill their quota. On the other hand.. newbies might find it intimidating. We might be able to waylay that by not having hard requirements during their trial (which is gonna be their first 1-2 months).. and we pretty much do that already.
  87. 20:20 <•robnik> that's fine
  88. 20:20 <•lauren_istlare> i would also really like to hear what zyl and davdak_auscent have to say.
  89. 20:20 <•robnik> yes
  90. 20:21 <•lauren_istlare> like, i am quite happy with all of this, but i just want to get another set of eyes to look over anything we might have missed.
  91. 20:22 <•robnik> same here. some people are already pissed at a few changes and this will be one more thing to fuel the fire. but, honestly, I want people in RITES who are tough and proactive. we've let in some krabs and softies and it's not good, imo
  92. 20:23 <•lauren_istlare> i think we've evolving. we're not the same corp we were a year ago. There's always gonna be resistance against that, but i think we're going to a good place.
  93. 20:24 <•robnik> yep. tbf, xavier would not have tolerated some of the shit that's happened
  94. 20:24 <•davdak_auscent> i am still a little wary of hard limits, but i know it's better to have a well defined goal to avoid accusations of bias
  95. 20:25 <•lauren_istlare> yeah. i think after their first couple of months 'y is my irl friend', may not be a good reason as to why they get passed over a req everyone else is held to
  96. 20:26 <•lauren_istlare> we can also re-promote the whole, an inactivity boot is not a closed door. It's a door left open for whenever you come back to the game.
  97. 20:26 <•robnik> yes. thats cronyism of the worst kind
  98. 20:26 <•davdak_auscent> 20 kills in 2 months is pretty close to laughably easy, but we want to avoid people trying to circumvent the system
  99. 20:27 <•robnik> anyway I look at other successful corps and they all have pvp activity minimums. we don't want to be HRDX/PL/etc, but that doesn't mean there aren't some lessons to be learned from other well-run groups
  100. 20:28 <•davdak_auscent> i think 20 kills in 2 months is a good baseline, since we will very rarely want to grant exceptions
  101. 20:29 <•davdak_auscent> if we think that people are meeting that benchmark but still not satisfactorily active, we can bump it up
  102. 20:29 <•robnik> anyway come nov. 1, between alt drops due to wardec and the purgeoning, i would expect us to drop down to 80-90 toons. be ready for that. :)
  103. 20:30 <•davdak_auscent> it's kinda on my back burner's back burner
  104. 20:30 <•davdak_auscent> but i'd like to figure something out with zkillboard api
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement