Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-03-29 0235 +Rob S.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkP4pw7VoFU&lc=z23fjfdosuuhun5au04t1aokgkfs0jq3eja0zkd0oavkbk0h00410
- https://pastebin.com/nK5Rp8x0
- __
- +Rob S. __ Refer to pp. 19-23 of the document (a link can be found in video's description box). The official explanation for the car's damage is that it had been rammed by police *after* having struck more than 30 people. If we are to reject that explanation *then there needs to have been two cars.* Why so? The first car would be the one we saw doing "doughnuts" and then a second *pre-damaged car swapped in.* However - is using two cars a possibility that's rooted in reality? How could the second pre-damaged car have been positioned in advance *when at that time the area was open to the public?* After all - "Peekay's son" may not have seen anything on that day _but he was in the area and able to stroll about._
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
- https://lestanediam.blogspot.com.au
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
- https://disqus.com/home/forum/lestanediam/
- Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement