SHARE
TWEET

moot says no r/a/dio threads

a guest Apr 25th, 2015 242 Never
  1. moot says no r/a/dio threads
  2.  
  3. (21:11:48) +Caelum: What's the stance toward radio threads on /a/?
  4. (21:11:59) +Caelum: I'm getting ambiguous messages
  5. (21:13:23) +BluRay: kill, advertising
  6. (21:14:17) +AoC: some streams get a free pass due to not harming the board and all that, but nothing officially sanctioned
  7. (21:14:50) +BluRay: yeah about that
  8. (21:14:53) %fsdfdsf: I do not think they are advertising as they do not post a link in the OP however moot has said the r/a/dio threads are to be deleted
  9. (21:15:07) +Troid: ...
  10. (21:15:07) +AoC: and the precedent is still 2007's "r/a/dio banned, moot agreed don't bother him about it"
  11. (21:15:12) +AoC: or was that 06?
  12. (21:15:31) ~moot: the precedent is any and all forms of advertising, which includes streams, is banned and has been for the better part of half a decade
  13. (21:15:36) ~moot: why the /a/ jans and mods weren't enforcing that is beyond me
  14. (21:15:49) +BluRay: moot already declared his position
  15. (21:16:25) +Caelum: Thanks for the clarification, but I've noticed r/a/dio in particular has been running free for quite a while now
  16. (21:16:34) +Caelum: Even some mods were affiliated in the past
  17. (21:16:36) %fsdfdsf: Yea they make no money
  18. (21:16:40) +AoC: ┐(゚~゚)┌ lots of stuff in /a/ that should be deleted
  19. (21:16:45) %fsdfdsf: In fact they have to pay to stream music for /a/
  20. (21:16:55) +AoC: like the buyfag and VN threads
  21. (21:17:06) +AoC: but it harms the board more to attempt to remove them
  22. (21:17:11) +Caelum: Hm
  23. (21:17:15) %fsdfdsf: It started out as nothing more than fun things are fun
  24. (21:17:23) +BluRay: don't look at me im just saying what im aware of
  25. (21:17:23) %fsdfdsf: But I guess it has become a problem
  26. (21:17:37) %fsdfdsf: Thi is how I see what has happened
  27. (21:17:53) +AoC: hah
  28. (21:17:59) +AoC: shitposting stopped in the ROB thread
  29. (21:18:06) +Caelum: I ask because a certain "Eden Radio" is playing right now and there's some controversy stirring
  30. (21:18:14) +Caelum: Someone even made a thread about it on /q/
  31. (21:18:15) %fsdfdsf: It's all Siztra
  32. (21:18:18) +Troid: ^
  33. (21:18:19) +AoC: who says a heavy hand doesn't work?
  34. (21:18:20) %fsdfdsf: And his shitbag shit posting crew
  35. (21:18:27) +Caelum: Gross
  36. (21:18:39) +Troid: fsdfdsf, did you see the /q/ thread about that I posted earlier?
  37. (21:18:48) %fsdfdsf: Which one
  38. (21:19:00) +Troid: there is an excellent chance OP or someone in https://boards.4chan.org/q/res/641510 is siztra
  39. (21:19:22) %fsdfdsf: Yea it is
  40. (21:19:26) +Troid: shocker
  41. (21:19:53) +AoC: "i'm not siztra" is a dead giveaway
  42. (21:20:04) +Caelum: What an unnecessary addition
  43. (21:20:04) +AoC: also the vendetta against kami in the past thread
  44. (21:20:27) %fsdfdsf: Yea it's mostly an attempt to get kami` fired cause I stepped up mdoeration
  45. (21:20:51) %fsdfdsf: Just sayin
  46. (21:20:51) +Troid: fsdfdsf, I'll quite happily point you to every single /q/ thread that so much as mentions siztra in the future
  47. (21:21:10) +Troid: almost no one starts threads about these people but themselves
  48. (21:21:25) +Caelum: So are you going to leave that thread alone?
  49. (21:21:32) %fsdfdsf: Yea for now
  50. (21:21:38) +Caelum: All right
  51. (21:21:49) +Caelum: It seems the previous one WAS deleted though judging from what the OP says
  52. (21:22:00) +Troid: who gives a fuck what siztra says
RAW Paste Data
Top