The headline "The limits of unlimited OneDrive storage" as well as other statements in this article that reference OneDrive storage are inaccurate, as they ostensibly apply to OneDrive for Business - a separate service - NOT OneDrive.



You state that "You might have unlimited storage capacity with OneDrive, but the 20,000 file limitation is actually much more limiting than the total capacity," yet OneDrive storage does NOT have a 20,000 file limitation. OneDrive for Business might have this limitation, but OneDrive does not.



This is particularly relevant since the context in which you frame this is the opener "Microsoft is upgrading Office 365 customers to unlimited OneDrive storage, but that doesn't mean you can just put all of your files in the cloud." This frames the 20,000 file limitation as applicable to all Office 365 customers who are being upgraded to unlimited OneDrive storage, but that is NOT the case. This statement is false and misleading.



Are you going to update your article to reflect reality? Or does your desire for sensationalism outstrip your journalistic ethics?



It's a legitimate question, and the longer you let this sit the more it seems to answer itself.



By falsely conflating OneDrive with OneDrive for Business, you certainly cast a wider net of potential readership, but you also muddy the waters for many OneDrive customers in a way that Microsoft might even consider libelous.



You're prior response was the kind of weak and evasive sort one might expect from a politician, not a journalist.



Very disappointing article, and a very disappointing response.