8 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-01-24 0745 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-01-24 0745 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/KUpTSjY5XCy
https://pastebin.com/kNmWdK0h
__

+nationalparksign __ Interestingly "Michael Chranston" from one of my "ISS" videos recently mentioned the bone loss drug "Prolia" (or is it "Pro Liar/"Po Liar"!) on the following thread as a kind of "proof" for a manned "ISS": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQSCxfV87SE&lc=z12vgt1arvrltlpy404cjlor4tuij5chy50

However - *if the drug is effective on the ground and the "ISS" is fake then we should not be surprised by a "positive result"*. I.e., its mention should have *no influence* on our belief about it being real and manned.

Apparently - according to "Michael Chranston" the "research" was conducted using "24 mice over 12 days" aboard the "ISS". How can you get meaningful data from such a small study of such a short duration? Did they have another 24 mice as a "control" who were not given the drug or was it split into two groups of 12 (making it even worse)?

*How were these mice fed? Who cleaned up their micro/zero-gravity cages*? Surely they would have drowned in their floating p!ss. I'd love to see a mouse use a "gravity feeder and water dispenser" in weightlessness. So how exactly does that work?

_F_kc "Prolia" - mice in space - that's the kind of "science" that children would find fascinating!_

Certainly - when that "Andrew Winnard" character (aka "Andrew Losehard") turned up (the guy who claimed someone else's alleged image of the "ISS" as his own: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4898fr4XP4) he talked about "bone/muscle studies" of alleged "astronauts" (that he himself claimed to have done).

To have "medical research" and "research results" purportedly from the "ISS" serves as a powerful "belief hurdle" that's too high for most people to get over. Those who say _"but they have done medical research on the 'ISS' so it must be true"_ are not realising that "medical research" can be plagued with all kinds of dubious claims and other bullsh!t.

But if the research has also been done on the ground then faking the results is surely as easy as it gets. *Who exactly can double check to verify the results, anyway*?! Such "research" can mean nothing with regard to proving there are people living and working in a permanent micro/zero-gravity environment.

To return to an earlier point. With all of the photos from other alleged experiments *why is it we never see any photos or footage of the alleged mice in space*? (There are some videos I'm aware of but they are decades old and were from "drop tests" and not from "space stations".)

Why is it we only see worthless 180p webcam style black and white time-lapsed clips of "spiders" that are proof of nothing other than a centabillion-dollar research facility going cheap as f_kc on essential video recording equipment (those video cameras and the footage they create are rather important!).


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.