nmap

root@:~# nmap 192.168.0.*

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-10-16 19:21 VET
Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.1
Host is up (0.0039s latency).
Not shown: 998 closed ports
PORT     STATE SERVICE
80/tcp   open  http
8080/tcp open  http-proxy
MAC Address: 64:70:02:9F:FA:18 (Tp-link Technologies CO.)

Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.100
Host is up (0.0000070s latency).
Not shown: 997 closed ports
PORT    STATE SERVICE
22/tcp  open  ssh
80/tcp  open  http
389/tcp open  ldap

Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 13.16 seconds


--->> En la segunda me muestra lo siguiente:
Primera parte lo mismo y la segunda lo siguiente.

Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.101
Host is up (0.0000032s latency).
Not shown: 998 closed ports
PORT    STATE SERVICE
22/tcp  open  ssh
80/tcp  open  http

Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 8.83 seconds



---> Siguiente comando:

root@host:/micasa/elwuilmer:# nmap 192.168.0.0/24

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-10-16 19:23 VET
Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.1
Host is up (0.00084s latency).
Not shown: 998 closed ports
PORT     STATE SERVICE
80/tcp   open  http
8080/tcp open  http-proxy
MAC Address: 64:70:02:9F:FA:18 (Tp-link Technologies CO.)

Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.100
Host is up (0.0000070s latency).
Not shown: 997 closed ports
PORT    STATE SERVICE
22/tcp  open  ssh
80/tcp  open  http
389/tcp open  ldap

Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 14.90 seconds


--->> En la segunda me muestra lo siguiente:
Primera parte lo mismo y la segunda lo siguiente.

Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.101
Host is up (0.0000032s latency).
Not shown: 998 closed ports
PORT    STATE SERVICE
22/tcp  open  ssh
80/tcp  open  http

Nmap done: 256 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 8.85 seconds