March 9 (first treaty draft)
[8:44pm] Tenaway: Cool
[8:45pm] Tenaway: Also, like I said, PM’ed you a treaty draft
[8:45pm] Tenaway: One article in it I wrote but wasn’t sure of was Article 4
[8:46pm] Mortimer: I'm looking it over now
[8:46pm] Tenaway: It was intended to not cause either of us to be caught between treaties if for whatever reason (and I hope it never happens) we were fighting UPN or you were fighting Guardian
[8:46pm] Tenaway: But I worry it came off as we were looking for a way out, which wasn’t my intention at all
[8:47pm] Tenaway: It’s just something I’ve seen a lot in other games, having to pick between 2 treaties, and I didn’t want you guys to end up stuck in that posiition ever
[8:48pm] Mortimer: Well, I'm sure there is a way to come up with wording that accomadates that idea
[8:49pm] Tenaway: Like I said it was just a quick first draft. Add, edit or delete to your hearts content
[8:49pm] Tenaway: Man Nick is really upset about CU
[8:49pm] Mortimer: will do
[8:49pm] Tenaway: He’s querying me about it
[8:49pm] Mortimer: lol, i told you
March 14 (final draft discussion)

Mortimer: I have the treaty posted in our gov forum, awaiting back from these guys.
[11:48am] Tenages: Cool
[11:48am] Mortimer: I had to explain article 4 to them
[11:48am] Tenages: Yeah I talked to Nick about it some
[11:49am] Tenages: He liked the purpose of it, but thought it should be more vague in the public version, which is cool withus
[11:49am] Tenages: I just don’t want to get you stuck between us and UPN at all
[11:49am] Tenages: Not that I have any plans to be starting anything with UPN
[11:51am] Mortimer: No, and while I don't think that would necessarily be a problem, because I don't think either side has a habit of acting irrationally. Any potential conflicts in interest would likely be forseen far in advance.