Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-01 1450 +nationalparksign
- https://plus.google.com/u/0/108131621397475586556
- https://pastebin.com/gv9KDryj
- __
- +nationalparksign . __ Oh my - I'm making my way through them. I can tell you now that the only people who will end up amusing us aboard the alleged "ISS" will be those who test well with the children. Those Q&A snippets are nothing but "motivation propaganda" for future stars of the magic floating centabillion-dollar propaganda platform.
- The following was interesting. Not just because of the unnecessary cut - but because she talked about becoming _"the best version of yourself"._
- *That's some "clone priming" right there*. The following link is queued up at 1m:19s: https://youtu.be/0iL83kvR_jg?t=79
- (I don't think she's going to make the "cut" - pun intended.)
- I have noticed other forms of "clone priming" in the form of ads where they have two people who make different superannuation decisions at the same time. Then a clock accelerates through years and decades and one person - _unsurprisingly_ - is doing much better than the other.
- In time - perhaps within a generation or two - *the "Algorithm" will have enough data on enough people who are "similar enough" (to be considered like "clones") that actual data like that can be shown*.
- Such as: "Siri says - if *you* go ahead and smoke that cigarette there's an 80% chance *you* will end up addicted based on data from others just like yourself - in the same situation - who accepted the cigarette. And 90% of those who refused the cigarette ended up happier and healthier." etc.
- That's going to be tough to resist if you were born into a system seeing proof of this advice correlating with the percentages given. _Only a fool would go ahead and choose that cigarette!_
- Now best of all - *the algorithm could simply lie and none will be the wiser.*
- It may be that really there's only a 10% chance of someone like yourself getting addicted - but the "Algorithm" doesn't care if it's programmed to influence you into not trying that first cigarette.
- If the person does smoke the cigarette and doesn't get addicted the algorithm will note that person's disobedience and the person will assume he or she was one of the "lucky 30 percent". _Sometimes you beat the odds._
- The algorithm can slip in a lie every now and then *as needed*. And of those who trust the algorithm - _who would ever be the wiser?_
- There is never-ending debate about "free will" versus "determinism". Well - with enough data about enough people over enough time and the "Algorithm" will acquire the potential to "guide" people in a *deterministic way*. In a world where "free will" may have (once) been a genuine thing!
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
- https://lestanediam.blogspot.com
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vimeo
- https://vimeo.com/lestanediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vidme
- https://vid.me/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Dailymotion
- https://www.dailymotion.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's LiveLeak
- https://www.liveleak.com/c/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
- https://disqus.com/home/forum/lestanediam/
- Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
