Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-04 2210 +Tzstep

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-04 2210 +Tzstep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA3uylgyuG4&feature=gp-n-y&google_comment_id=z12pgtpwspawjfscw234gxfr2qy2wxbcn
https://pastebin.com/ghw2xeDL
__


+Tzstep __ Yes, without any doubt you are most definitely missing something. _I am completely baffled by *your* comment._ You also seem to be the only person who doesn't "get it". *Did you even watch the video?* I'm not sure you have. You can't have watched it if you are asking that question. It is for that reason I am taking this tone with you. *I cannot be expected to do everything for everyone at all times.*

*Did you even read the video's title?* It's unlikely that you even made the effort - you wouldn't be baffled if you just thought about the videos' TITLE.

I have to wonder whether you are more simply pretending to be baffled (as I am of your comment) and so I will go ahead and explain the situation for the benefit of everyone else who will read this.

____

PAY ATTENTION

*"Kim Hoaxashian" claimed the tightrope walker's attire was inappropriate and further speculated that his attire looked like a skirt.*

All of this was clearly explained in the video which you either did not watch or did not understand.

_That is the problem._ But since you're "baffled" I now have to explain WHY.

Although in the photo the tightrope walker *does* appear to be wearing a "skirt" it is NOT the case.

Not only is it NOT the case (and this is the important part) *"KIM HOAXASHIAN" KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT IT WAS NOT THE CASE AND WAS NOT WEARING A SKIRT OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT WAS INAPPROPRIATE.

____

If you are genuinely baffled then stop and reflect on what has been written thus far because what I am going to write next will be somewhat insulting and offensive and if you were genuinely baffled then I don't want to insult you. But if you are just f_kcing around then you deserve to be insulted.

So if you are a sincere person stop reading and reflect on the above. If you are a genuine person and you now understand the above then you will also understand why I have taken the following tone with you.

____

When "Kim Hoaxashian" selected the photo for his video he *MUST* have seen other photos beyond the one he selected. He MUST have seen *OTHER PHOTOS* (any other photos) of the tightrope walker *which would have made it crystal clear he was wearing pants and NOT a skirt.*

A simple Google Image Search INSTANTLY reveals he is NOT wearing a skirt or anything inappropriate.

____

Therefore "Kim Hoaxashian" knows *very well* that it was ONLY the *angle of the photo* and the *step position* that gives us the appearance of wearing a skirt (and thus something "inappropriate").

Now I become insulting (if you are not a genuine person):

__

*THIS IS OUTRIGHT DECEIVE AND IF YOU ARE AN HONEST PERSON THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE OKAY WITH THIS.*

One must wonder why a "truther" (someone who posts videos to YouTube on "truther topics") would use an image to deceive his audience in such a way.  Are you really okay with being deceived? Don't be stupid.

*It is clear that "Kim Hoaxashian" intentionally chose this PARTICULAR photo over EVERY OTHER PHOTO because it FIT HIS NARRATIVE. It was the ONLY PHOTO that enabled him make a comment about the guy's attire appearing inappropriate and resembling a skirt.*

_Do you understand now?_

"Kim Hoaxashian" even gave himself some "wiggle room" - *just like all disinformation agents do.*

This was a FOOLISH action because anyone could EASILY check what the "Phillippe Petit" was ACTUALLY wearing and there is no way "Kim Hoaxashian" ONLY saw THAT image he had used since it didn't even show up in a normal image search. *That means even if "Kim Hoaxashian" did not do a GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH but used some OTHER image search method the photo he used was NOT a popular image and whatever other search he did use (if not Google) *would have definitely shown him OTHER images where it is clear he was NOT wearing a skirt.*

__

All of this means that "Kim Hoaxashian" *made an intentional effort to misrepresent.*

Are you going to overlook that? _Are you going to tell me you're okay with that?_

*Are you really going to try and give me a hard time for pointing this out?!?!?!?!?!*

__

He had INTENTIONALLY and WILFULLY *MISREPRESENTED* something that did not need to be misrepresented *EXCEPT to hit upon "gender reversal" themes.*

This is evidence that "Kim Hoaxashian" is artificially constructing his videos to appeal *to a certain audience* so that he may DECEIVE them.

He knows what his audience WANTS so he is sprinkling that in so he can MISLEAD and DECEIVE them. He is abusing his audience and are you really going to pretend you're okay with that?

__

When it comes to "truthers" and "truther channels" this kind of behaviour - *_this kind of flagrant and undeniable misrepresentation_* - should be considered *not only* a SIN but a CRIME.

In a "truth community" there can really be only one crime: *TO DECEIVE.*

And "Kim Hoaxashian" is guilty as charged.

This is grounds for instant disqualification. He should have ZERO subscribers after this intentional misrepresentation. ANYONE who watches his videos is allowing potential disinformation to enter their heads. And if "Kim Hoaxashian" lies about something that resonates with an audience member then that audience member has absorbed a LIE.

That audience member has had his or her perception of reality DISTORTED. "Kim Hoaxashian" has sought to make people "insane" by presenting a FALSE IMPRESSION of reality. There can be no bigger crime in a "community" that purports to love the truth and hate lies.

*Absolutely NO ONE should take "Kim Hoaxashian" seriously any more.*

This is an unforgiveable crime.

_Do you understand now?_

Or are you inclined to let it go because you like him? Are you inclined to give him a second chance because of all the "good work" he's done? Don't be a sucker.

If you don't understand what has happened or its seriousness then you can't be helped. And that's not my fault. *It's not Lesta's fault that you are "baffled" by something so simple and obvious.*

If you still cannot see the problem/issue despite my video SPELLING IT OUT clearly and despite THIS COMMENT to further spell it out clearly then you cannot be helped.

*In fact - it would be reasonable to suspect that YOU are either a retard or are only pretending to not "get it".*

So which is it? Are you a retard or are you just pretending to not get it?

Your comment to me has already destroyed your credibility with me.

*DO YOU LIKE BEING LIED TO?*

*IN A "TRUTH COMMUNITY" DO YOU GIVE LIARS A SECOND CHANCE?*

Do you want to be in receipt of distorted and misrepresented views?

If you do then carry on not thinking there is anything wrong with what "Kim Hoaxashian" has done. Go ahead and forgive him. But do not think it will change. He will only be more sneaky and clever with his lies now that people are onto him.

*"KIM HOAXASHIAN CLEARLY HAS AN AGENDA(!) and either you are too stupid to see it or you are more simply pretending not to.*

____

If you have read this and now understand what the big deal is then by all means let me know.

It is *never* okay to lie and misrepresent and Lesta will not pander to anyone who does. In 2016 the gloves are coming off and anyone caught peddling disinformation or misrepresenting anything will have a bad time with Lesta.


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w