Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Hello myxomop,
- >
- > Two of our recent encounters on mushroomobserver have been unpleasant. On
- > the first occasion back in May you approached me as if you were an
- > authority when objecting to my use of the name “yellow morel”.
- > I knew the name would be controversial, and I was expecting objections,
- > but the way you objected was really annoying. You talked down to me as if
- > you were my superior telling me how it is. I’m 38 years old. I wrote
- > my master’s thesis on the species problem, and I teach logic and
- > ethics at Ohio University. I’m also a military veteran with service
- > in two wars, and I’ve been hunting and photographing mushrooms since
- > 1998. I’ve earned the respect that I demand. I’m not asking
- > that you look up to me, but I do not tolerate anybody talking down to me.
- >
- > The second unpleasant encounter was a few days ago when you offered your
- > critique of my photography. The criticism was annoying not only because it
- > was unsolicited and condescending, but also because it was totally off the
- > mark. Your suggestions demonstrated a total lack of understanding about
- > the scientific goals of the observation and the photographic challenges
- > presented by that tiny black mushroom. I would have happily answered a
- > request for more detail, but instead you spoke down to me as if you were
- > some kind of authority. I was posting beautiful mushroom photos years
- > before you rolled up on mushroomobserver with your early crappy snap
- > shots. If you compare your portfolio to mine you will see that you are not
- > in a position to instruct me on photographic technique. On this occasion I
- > got angry and responded poorly – for that I apologize.
- >
- > You spend a lot of time on mushroomobserver myxomop, and I appreciate it
- > when you put a name on one of my observations. However, I do not
- > appreciate the disrespect and the drama. There are plenty of places on the
- > internet where can go to engage in drama. Please keep it off
- > mushroomobserver, or at least keep it out of my observations.
- >
- > I hope my point here is clear, and I hope that we can have more civil
- > interactions in the future.
- >
- > Dan Molter
- >
- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- >
- > Dear Dan,
- >
- > Thank you for your embarrassing letter. I will take your mediocre
- > lifetime achievements and middle-age into greater consideration when
- > entering into future debates or trying to kindly and conscientiously offer
- > up constructive criticisms. Of course, if your arguments stood on their
- > merits and their merits alone, perhaps you wouldn't feel the need to
- > remind us of the sublime gift to the world that is The Dan Molter to
- > bolster them.
- >
- > I have no regrets about how I've carried myself in your company. I have
- > consistently dealt with the content of the debate, not the character of
- > the debater, free from patronization and condescension, not once having
- > been afforded the same courtesy from you.
- >
- > Had you come to me truly as an adult, not smuggling schoolyard put-downs
- > and smug self-promotion into a letter of supposed reconciliation between
- > feuding parties, I might be ever-so-slightly more inclined to entertain
- > your requests for self-censorship, but I don't find myself in the habit
- > rewarding arrogance, especially arrogance masquerading as congeniality.
- > Shots fired across a bow with tongue-in-cheek pleasantries and apologies
- > etched into the casings draw no less blood, but I thank you for the empty
- > sentiment all the same. It does not go unnoticed.
- >
- > The truth is, Danny, you would like nothing more than to be looked up to.
- > The fact that I have offered commentary which runs contrary to your
- > personal opinion, stood my ground without compromising the argument to
- > cater to your ego, and then been chastised for essentially neglecting to
- > salute you when I entered the room, makes this unflatteringly clear. This
- > is a personality campaign you've pursued against more users than one, and
- > we all find it unprofessional and, as previously mentioned, embarrassing.
- >
- > As a side note, a minute's worth of homework might have caused you to
- > notice that there are no less than three other photographers credited in
- > the copyrights of images used in my observations. Consequently, images
- > from Bolivian observations from 2006, 2007 and much of 2008 are not my
- > own. I've offered up apologies for the worst of them on several
- > occasions. A poorly documented record being better than no record, they
- > live on in the background, unlikely to ever be confidently identified to
- > species.
- >
- > I also couldn't help but notice that after destroying the original
- > observation in question, then creating a new one, there appeared a new
- > image adhering to the very principles outlined in my recommendations,
- > exposing for the shadows and showing much-needed, diagnostic detail. I
- > heartily commend you on taking this genuine step toward overcoming your
- > objection to outside input and sincerely hope it will be a continuing
- > trend.
- >
- > Yours truly,
- >
- > -myxomop.
- >
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement