Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- An Excerpt from: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment
- by Charles T. Munger
- Envy/Jealousy Tendency
- A member of a species designed through evolutionary
- process to want often-scarce food is going to be driven
- strongly toward getting food when it first sees food.
- And this is going to occur often and tend to create some
- conflict when the food is seen in the possession of another
- member of the same species. This is probably the
- evolutionary origin of the Envy/Jealousy Tendency that
- lies so deep in human nature. Sibling jealousy is clearly
- very strong and usually greater in children than adults. It
- is often stronger than jealousy directed at strangers.
- Kantian Fairness Tendency probably contributes to this
- result.
- Envy/jealousy is extreme in myth, religion, and
- literature wherein, in account after account, it triggers
- hatred and injury. It was regarded as so pernicious by
- the Jews of the civilization that preceded Christ that it
- was forbidden, by phrase after phrase, in the laws of
- Moses. You were even warned by the Prophet not to
- covet your neighbor’s donkey.
- And envy/jealousy is also extreme in modern life.
- For instance, university communities often go bananas
- when some university employee in money management,
- or some professor in surgery, gets annual compensation
- in multiples of the standard professorial salary. And in
- modern investment banks, law firms, etc., the
- envy/jealousy effects are usually more extreme than they
- are in university faculties. Many big law firms, fearing
- disorder from envy/jealousy, have long treated all senior
- partners alike in compensation, no matter how different
- their contributions to firm welfare. As I have shared the
- observation of life with Warren Buffett over decades, I
- have heard him wisely say on several occasions: “It is
- not greed that drives the world, but envy.”
- And, because this is roughly right, one would expect
- a vast coverage of envy/jealousy in psychology
- textbooks. But no such vast coverage existed when I
- read my three textbooks. Indeed, the very words “envy”
- and “jealousy” were often absent from the index.
- Nondiscussion of envy/jealousy is not a phenomenon
- confined to psychology texts. When did any of you
- last engage in any large group discussion of some issue
- wherein adult envy/jealousy was identified as the cause
- of someone’s argument? There seems to be a general
- taboo against any such claim. If so, what accounts for
- the taboo?
- My guess is that people widely and generally sense
- that labeling some position as driven by envy/jealousy
- will be regarded as extremely insulting to the position
- taker, possibly more so when the diagnosis is correct
- than when it is wrong. And if calling a position “envydriven”
- is perceived as the equivalent of describing its
- holder as a childish mental basket case, then it is quite
- understandable how a general taboo has arisen.
- But should this general taboo extend to psychology
- texts when it creates such a large gap in the correct, psychological
- explanation of what is widespread and important?
- My answer is no.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement