§8.3.3 of Riot's own official LCS rulebook states that:

Finality of Judgment. If a referee makes an incorrect judgment during a match, the judgment cannot be reversed, as the decision of the referee is absolute and final and there is no appeal process.

In addition, there is not a single word in the rulebook that says anything about what Nick Allen tries to falsely imply in his article: 'but was not properly apprised of their ability to have a remake by the referee on stage'.

It's their job to know the rules and their rights. They didn't know they had the option to request a remake. That's their own fucking fault for not reading the rulebook.

So to summarize: 1) SK doesn't know their rights. 2) Nick Allen falsely implies it's the referee's responsability to inform them of these rights. 3) Riot breaks their own LCS rules by not respecting the "finality of judgment". Integrity is not valued at Riot, apparently.

sorry for stealing this comment from /u/andyness93 but it just had a valid point