Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Subject: Re: Disappointed
- From: David Henderson <david@davidhenderson.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:59:26 -0400
- To: Christopher Turner <#REDACTED#>
- Mr. Turner,
- In the time-honored and accepted world of writing, journalism and =
- information sharing, readers/audiences want to see the credentials and =
- accomplishments of the people behind the scenes who write and made =
- decisions. It's always been that way and still is. In social media, =
- people who post no bio are often not followed. There's plenty of =
- faceless crap online, and I, for one, find it offensive.
- I do not accept that you have any credible standing or life =
- accomplishments to give me advice about social media or reporting.=20
- Wikipedia is a shadowy, faceless concept that I have dared to expose. I =
- bet more people will people will be speaking up, too.
- Have a nice day.
- David Henderson
- On Mar 31, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Christopher Turner wrote:
- >=20
- > Mr. Henderson,
- >=20
- > I have to say, it's very disappointing to see a journalist post an =
- article online, tweet it, and then block a reader when questioned about =
- it's veracity.
- >=20
- > I think you need to seriously rethink both your approach to social =
- media as well as the manner in which you do your reporting If having =
- people read your work is your goal your current method is =
- counterproductive.
- >=20
- > You will not have to worry with hearing from me again, via E-mail, =
- Twitter, or otherwise.
- >=20
- > Regards,
- > Chris Turner
- > @megachris
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement