Advertisement
Guest User

vmware statement Apache range DoS vulnerability

a guest
Sep 2nd, 2011
295
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 9.23 KB | None | 0 0
  1. VMware Statement
  2. ----------------
  3.  
  4. Based on extensive review, VMware and the ASF have determined that httpd 1.3 is not affected by this incident, contrary to indications given in the most recent advisory and other third-party advisories.
  5. The faulty logic which allowed the effects of range segments to be multiplicative rather than cumulative was introduced in httpd 2.0.
  6. Customers using httpd-1.3 packages from vFabric ERS, or other distributions of httpd-1.3 are not affected.
  7.  
  8. VMware advises administrators to note the more sophisticated patterns to test for in these updated workarounds, notably the evaluation of the 'request-range:' header. A patch addressing the issue is not yet available.
  9.  
  10. The Apache Software Foundation HTTP Project has published release 2.2.20, which also resolves the problem. In addition, it introduces several protocol layer bugs, and will introduce application incompatibilities which are not yet fully evaluated. Customers are welcomed to report any incompatibilities or defects they observe for further review.
  11.  
  12. VMware expects to deliver patches for all ERS 4.0.3 httpd packages upon critical evaluation and publication of the eventual ASF patch, and would caution all administrators that this patch will not apply to earlier ERS releases. Administrators on older versions would benefit from adopting ERS 4.0.3 prior to this patch release. Older versions may alternately continue to be deployed with the published workarounds, although this solution will cause degradation of performance for certain applications (PDF document readers are one such example).
  13.  
  14. Customers will be notified as patches or new information become available. At this time, patched binaries are not anticipated prior to Sept 5th, and customers are strongly encouraged to adopt the recommended workarounds in the correspond ASF advisory.
  15.  
  16. Below is the latest statement from the ASF concerning CVE-2011-3192, which has NOT changed since the last announcement sent by VMware. The only changed content is the above in the 'VMware statement'. If you have questions please submit a support ticket through the VMware portal.
  17.  
  18. Apache HTTPD Security ADVISORY - UPDATE 2
  19. ==============================
  20.  
  21. Title: Range header DoS vulnerability Apache HTTPD 1.3/2.x
  22.  
  23. CVE: CVE-2011-3192
  24. Last Change: 20110826 1030Z
  25. Date: 20110824 1600Z
  26. Product: Apache HTTPD Web Server
  27. Versions: Apache 1.3 all versions, Apache 2 all versions
  28.  
  29. Changes since last update
  30. =========================
  31. In addition to the 'Range' header - the 'Range-Request' header is equally
  32. affected. Furthermore various vendor updates, improved regexes (speed and
  33. accommodating a different and new attack pattern).
  34.  
  35. Description:
  36. ============
  37.  
  38. A denial of service vulnerability has been found in the way the multiple
  39. overlapping ranges are handled by the Apache HTTPD server:
  40.  
  41. http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175
  42.  
  43.  
  44. An attack tool is circulating in the wild. Active use of this tool has
  45. been observed.
  46.  
  47. The attack can be done remotely and with a modest number of requests can
  48. cause very significant memory and CPU usage on the server.
  49.  
  50. The default Apache HTTPD installation is vulnerable.
  51.  
  52. There is currently no patch/new version of Apache HTTPD which fixes this
  53. vulnerability. This advisory will be updated when a long term fix
  54. is available.
  55.  
  56. A full fix is expected in the next 24 hours.
  57.  
  58. Background and the 2007 report
  59. ==============================
  60.  
  61. There are two aspects to this vulnerability. One is new, is Apache specific;
  62. and resolved with this server side fix. The other issue is fundamentally a
  63. protocol design issue dating back to 2007:
  64.  
  65. http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Jan/83
  66.  
  67. The contemporary interpretation of the HTTP protocol (currently) requires a
  68. server to return multiple (overlapping) ranges; in the order requested. This
  69. means that one can request a very large range (e.g. from byte 0- to the end)
  70. 100's of times in a single request.
  71.  
  72. Being able to do so is an issue for (probably all) webservers and currently
  73. subject of an IETF discussion to change the protocol:
  74.  
  75. http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/311
  76.  
  77.  
  78. This advisory details a problem with how Apache httpd and its so called
  79. internal 'bucket brigades' deal with serving such "valid" request. The
  80. problem is that currently such requests internally explode into 100's of
  81. large fetches, all of which are kept in memory in an inefficient way. This
  82. is being addressed in two ways. By making things more efficient. And by
  83. weeding out or simplifying requests deemed too unwieldy.
  84.  
  85. Mitigation:
  86. ===========
  87.  
  88. There are several immediate options to mitigate this issue until a full fix
  89. is available. Below examples handle both the 'Range' and the legacy
  90. 'Request-Range' with various levels of care.
  91.  
  92. Note that 'Request-Range' is a legacy name dating back to Netscape Navigator
  93. 2-3 and MSIE 3. Depending on your user community - it is likely that you
  94. can use option '3' safely for this older 'Request-Range'.
  95.  
  96. 1) Use SetEnvIf or mod_rewrite to detect a large number of ranges and then
  97. either ignore the Range: header or reject the request.
  98.  
  99. Option 1: (Apache 2.2)
  100.  
  101. # Drop the Range header when more than 5 ranges.
  102. # CVE-2011-3192
  103. SetEnvIf Range (?:,.*?){5,5} bad-range=1
  104. RequestHeader unset Range env=bad-range
  105.  
  106. # We always drop Request-Range; as this is a legacy
  107. # dating back to MSIE3 and Netscape 2 and 3.
  108. RequestHeader unset Request-Range
  109.  
  110. # optional logging.
  111. CustomLog logs/range-CVE-2011-3192.log common env=bad-range
  112. CustomLog logs/range-CVE-2011-3192.log common env=bad-req-range
  113.  
  114. Above may not work for all configurations. In particular situations
  115. mod_cache and (language) modules may act before the 'unset'
  116. is executed upon during the 'fixup' phase.
  117.  
  118. Option 2: (Pre 2.2 and 1.3)
  119.  
  120. # Reject request when more than 5 ranges in the Range: header.
  121. # CVE-2011-3192
  122. #
  123. RewriteEngine on
  124. RewriteCond %{HTTP:range} !(bytes=[^,]+(,[^,]+){0,4}$|^$)
  125. # RewriteCond %{HTTP:request-range} !(bytes=[^,]+(?:,[^,]+){0,4}$|^$)
  126. RewriteRule .* - [F]
  127.  
  128. # We always drop Request-Range; as this is a legacy
  129. # dating back to MSIE3 and Netscape 2 and 3.
  130. RequestHeader unset Request-Range
  131.  
  132. The number 5 is arbitrary. Several 10's should not be an issue and may be
  133. required for sites which for example serve PDFs to very high end eReaders
  134. or use things such complex http based video streaming.
  135.  
  136. 2) Limit the size of the request field to a few hundred bytes. Note that while
  137. this keeps the offending Range header short - it may break other headers;
  138. such as sizeable cookies or security fields.
  139.  
  140. LimitRequestFieldSize 200
  141.  
  142. Note that as the attack evolves in the field you are likely to have
  143. to further limit this and/or impose other LimitRequestFields limits.
  144.  
  145. See: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
  146.  
  147.  
  148. 3) Use mod_headers to completely dis-allow the use of Range headers:
  149.  
  150. RequestHeader unset Range
  151.  
  152. Note that this may break certain clients - such as those used for
  153. e-Readers and progressive/http-streaming video.
  154.  
  155. Furthermore to ignore the Netscape Navigator 2-3 and MSIE 3 specific
  156. legacy header - add:
  157.  
  158. RequestHeader unset Request-Range
  159.  
  160. Unlike the commonly used 'Range' header - dropping the 'Request-Range'
  161. is not likely to affect many clients.
  162.  
  163. 4) Deploy a Range header count module as a temporary stopgap measure:
  164. http://people.apache.org/~dirkx/mod_rangecnt.c
  165.  
  166. Precompiled binaries for some platforms are available at:
  167. http://people.apache.org/~dirkx/BINARIES.txt
  168.  
  169.  
  170. 5) Apply any of the current patches under discussion - such as:
  171. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201108.mbox/%3cCAAPSnn2PO-d-C4nQt_TES2RRWiZr7urefhTKPWBC1b+K1Dqc7g@mail.gmail.com%3e
  172. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=1161534
  173.  
  174. OS and Vendor specific information
  175. ==================================
  176.  
  177. Red Hat: Option 1 cannot be used on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.
  178. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732928
  179.  
  180. NetWare: Pre compiled binaries available.
  181.  
  182. mod_security: Has updated their rule set; see
  183. http://blog.spiderlabs.com/2011/08/mitigation-of-apache-range-header-dos-attack.html
  184.  
  185.  
  186. Actions:
  187. ========
  188.  
  189. Apache HTTPD users who are concerned about a DoS attack against their server
  190. should consider implementing any of the above mitigations immediately.
  191.  
  192. When using a third party attack tool to verify vulnerability - note that most
  193. of the versions in the wild currently check for the presence of mod_deflate;
  194. and will (mis)report that your server is not vulnerable if this module is not
  195. present. This vulnerability is not dependent on presence or absence of
  196. that module.
  197.  
  198. Planning:
  199. =========
  200.  
  201. This advisory will be updated when new information, a patch or a new release
  202. is available. A patch or new Apache release for Apache 2.0 and 2.2 is expected
  203. in the next 24 hours. Note that, while popular, Apache 1.3 is deprecated.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement