6 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-17 2125 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-17 2125 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq-4anhJF_I&lc=z13qjptpuz23drxlw22btpawetqovbbhd04
https://pastebin.com/d8Ufyc0m
__

+Brian Hill __ In a *nutshell* the _"fallacy of the conspiracy theorist"_ is to *conclude* that an event or claim *must be false* because what can prove it true *has not been shown* when that proof can and should exist but there is no good reason for not having presented it.

For example - those who assert as a fact about reality that the "Melbourne Car Attack" was a staged event *because* no CCTV of the car on Bourke Street (at all) has been released are committing the fallacy of the conspiracy theorist. They may be right but they would be right for the wrong reasons.

Now go ahead and twist these words to make whatever silly time-wasting point you have come here to make.



__________
2017-07-17 2235

+Brian Hill __ Are you ever going to figure out that the lie system does not make mistakes? A smile is not proof of duping but the media will delight in showcasing it to encourage those who have lost trust in the lie system to conclude an event must have been staged - _even if it was not._

On the other hand - there are plenty of examples of pranksters and criminals who have made mistakes. You seem to think that those who are *farming humanity* are no more intelligent or proficient than amateur pranksters and criminals. You won't find so-called "fatal mistakes" with any of the "mass shootings" and "terror events". The lie system was born out of genius and there's no reason to think it hasn't been around since the *very* beginning.

As you slither about on YouTube all you will find is the news media presenting events and claims in a way that's doubtable. *In a way that baits you*. Everything comes down to a *subjective interpretation* - you are being *trolled* by intelligent people into choosing a side. Either side with the hoaxtards or the realtards.

You still haven't risen above that *planned dichotomy*. You are still stuck on the basics. You have made *zero* progress over the past couple of years and it is painful to have to repeat the same things over and over to you.




__________
2017-07-18 0320

+Brian Hill __ You ask questions of me in order to waste my time. You don't deserve to waste any more of my time.




__________
2017-07-18 0405

+Brian Hill __ Sometimes you ask decent questions but you don't seem able to learn from the answers you get. I am not spending any more of my time with someone as *unpleasant* as you.




__________
2017-07-18 1550

+Brian Hill __ I am now going to show that you are an *incompetent conspiracy theorist* who is a complete waste of my time.

Brian Hill wrote/asked: _To buy into the theory of ¨they will never make a fatal mistake¨, *I would need to know what fatal mistake can be expected from any given event* - but let's not go there, I tried to ask you this multiple times._

You have asked that in the past and I have answered it *multiple times* you sneaky little rat. Of all people *you* should know the answer. Here - an example - for the hundredth time: >> E.g., noticing a "pink jacket" that's seemingly worn by "three different people" *is not* a "fatal mistake" whereas seeing one of the supposed corpses stand up and do a jig would be. <<

What's that? You say you don't ever expect to see such a thing? Well - congratulations Mr Hill - perhaps now you can see that the *lie system* does not make "fatal mistakes" _unlike pranksters and criminals._

Mistaking proof's appearances (e.g., "pink jacket") for actual proof (e.g., "corpses doing a jig") is a chief mistake that's regularly made by *incompetent conspiracy theorists*.

I cannot take you seriously when you insist on asking the same questions that have been well and truly covered in the past while deviously claiming I haven't even answered it once!

Of all people you should know better. I have dedicated a lot of time to helping you but if you aren't here for the wrong reasons it has all gone over your head.

Everything you ask of me is not to gain any insights but more as a way to waste my time. I struggle to find *any* evidence that you're not just here - slithering about from video to video - to waste *everyone's* time.

Enough. Go away you truther pest.





____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.