<yoav> kling: u there?
<kling> yoav: hello!
--- kkristof_away is now known as kkristof
<yoav> kling: Hey! just a heads-up. I'm working on getting srcset to display the appropriate intrinsic size.  Not ready yet, but hopefully will be soon
<kling> yoav: oh, that sounds cool :)
<yoav> Other than that, I'd love to hear your opinion on srcN
<kling> I think the art direction use case is valid and needs a solution. I don't particularly like the syntax, though I don't feel super strongly
 I agree with anttik's point about avoiding non-static attribute names
--> Savago (~Savago@63.166.156.254) has joined #webkit
<kling> where did the dust settle on that webkit-dev thread?
<yoav> OK. So you'd prefer as well that the number of attributes is a limited small integer.
 The dust didn't really settle... :)
 No one was extremely enthusiastic, but not extremely negative either
 Most of the discussion was around "list of lists vs. multiple attributes"
<kling> I'm somewhere in that camp too :|
 what are other engines moving forward on?
 (if anything)
<yoav> Moz are moving forward with srcN
 Blink seems split (Many srcN fans, abarth opposes ATM because it may take longer than srcset)
<kling> hm. I really only dislike the arbitrary N part
 with a static set of attribute names, I'd say go for it :)
<-- Net147 has quit (Quit:  HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- The alternative IRC client)
<yoav> So, if we settle on src-1...src-9, you'd +1 ?
 I don't think many would oppose that
<kling> yeh, I'm +1 for that
<yoav> Awesome! :)
<-- fikst has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
<yoav> kling: I can start working on a patch in ~2 weeks. Will CC you on it.
<kling> yoav: excellent! :)