[QUOTE=Doomeye56;19205931]wilderness rogue is a term someone else mentioned, so lay off.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Doomeye56;19204725]What's a ranger without an animal companion? A forest based rogue?
[/QUOTE]

While that technically isn't the exact phrase 'Wilderness Rogue', it [I]is[/I] functionally equivalent. Or if it's not, you're going to have to explain how?

[QUOTE]So you don't like that I talked smack about your favorite Ranger flavor guess what, you were doing the same to the beastmaster ranger. [/QUOTE]

So... We shouldn't bring up potential conflicts with future things in the playtest material? I'm pretty sure that you're the only one who's done anything that could be considered 'talking smack' - no-one else has said anything bad about beastmaster-style rangers as a concept, just that they think there should be other options for archetypes and if they had to pick they would pick one that isn't that. :smallconfused:

[QUOTE]
This stuff goes full circle. Instead of whining to the DSP that they haven't fufilled your wishes yet* because they are taking a different approach.
So either wait for them to do some thing or homebrew your own, this goes for a Cha iniator too.

*they have repeated to say that they want to do more later.[/QUOTE]

Are you seriously suggesting that we [I]also[/I] shouldn't talk to the designers if we have suggestions or questions, in the contact thread for the designers, about PoW:E? What do we talk to them about then? Nothing?