Advertisement
Guest User

#6FBI Anon AMA

a guest
Sep 25th, 2016
417
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 16.72 KB | None | 0 0
  1. AMA WITH FBI ANON (#6, 09/26/2016)
  2.  
  3. the Cohen Group: hot or cold?
  4. >Hot
  5.  
  6. was Hillary involved in Richard Holbrooke's death? Or was it just an accident?
  7. >Holbrooke died of natural causes. A rare problem, yes, but unfortunately no foul play involved.
  8.  
  9. in March 2014 lots of gold went missing in Ukraine. They were reportedly flown away to the United States. Are Clintons and their clicque involved in these shit? What is Pinchuk's role? Any other Ukrainians we should look into?
  10. >They were *reportedly flown to the US, but most of it went to China. There is a reason why China and Russia have been building gold reserves. Anyone involved in the Yakunovich government is of interest.
  11.  
  12. what was on those servers she tried to hide?
  13. >Many different things. The media has been trying to spn it as "it's just our drone program", but there was a lot more. Our covert ops were on there, and many of our operatives died as a result of her carelessness.
  14.  
  15. What is your opinion on the plan to push these topics in the rest of our time (see image attached)
  16. >In my opinion, the topics which you should focus on in that list should take priority in reverse order. Details of the Clinton's dirty dealings in China and Haiti are icing on the cake, details which most Americans could care less about because they have no perception of these countries.
  17.  
  18. >Hillary's health is huge, but the best topic to my mind is her intimidation and silencing of the women Bill has raped/assaulted. These women are numerous, yet few have managed to tell their story, let alone have anyone care. You all can make that happen.
  19.  
  20. Really hoping for a wiki leaks dump tomorrow morning. Kek be praised it happens.
  21. >We suspect they have something big. Before I thought they were blowhards with no information, but now I am starting to think they got a hold of something damaging.
  22.  
  23. Body Double, Hologram Speeches, Green Screen. Anything to it?
  24. >Body double is correct. Everything else is pure speculation. Her vision is off due to whatever condition she has.
  25.  
  26. Any hints as to foul play speculated at the debates? What kind of MSM leverage do you predict will be levied if (read when) trump decimates Hillary at the debates?
  27. >The debates are (surprisingly) locked down very well. The rules and security are well-established. Of course the moderators will try several "gotcha" questions on trump, but that was expected.
  28.  
  29. can we, anons, using only publicly available material, get enough evidence to indict Hillary?
  30. > No, and I ahve stated this from the beginning. The goal was to make noise and evoke enough doubt about HRC to get the MSM talking. In case you did not notice, they are openly discussing memes and internet subculture in the mainstream. The ironic thing is, they backed off this last week because they realized as they kept talking about it, people kept coming.
  31.  
  32. the Brookings Institute. How evil is this organization. Is 2014 CHARGE project (combined Brookings and Clinton Global Initiative) used to launder money?
  33. > CHARGE was used for weapons and people
  34.  
  35. Yunus, Grameen family of corporations and human trafficking: Yes or no? If yes: does Norway play a part? Grameenphone and Telenor: worth looking into? Could you name some middle-man between Clintons and Yunus?
  36. > Not sure, truthfully. But if they have associations with the Clintons, they are worth looking into.
  37.  
  38. Do you trust Chaffetz?
  39. >I know him personally. He is furious over what has happened, but is constrained by the DC beltway groupthink. If DJT gets elected, expect him to unleash his full fury on HRC.
  40.  
  41. Was Pagliano's Contempt of congress part of a greater play? If so, what purpose would you speculate that it would serve? How close do you suspect that the house is to uncovering the corruption there?
  42.  
  43. And just for funsies: What's your opinion on Trey Gowdy?
  44. >Pagliano's absence to Congress was very deliberate. The plan is to give every person close to HRC immunity and have them lay low and "run out the clock". Then once she gets elected, she will pardon herself and everyone involved, then we will be able to release their testimony. By that time, no one will care, or so they think. We already have his testimony as to what happened, we refused to turn it over to Congress. That's why we put the poor new guy in front of Congress when they asked for the 302's.
  45.  
  46. >Never met Gowdy, watching him on YouTube is fun.
  47.  
  48. Can Jimmy Duncan & Caffetz in Congress be trusted with sensitive information?
  49. >Yes
  50.  
  51. How safe do you think T is? In regards to Clinton Body Count...
  52. >Very. Assassinating major figures is very difficult and very dangerous, especially today. There are eyes everywhere, so the best way to kill someone is to assassinate their character, which is why the MSM constantly goes hard after Trump.
  53.  
  54. What country was the Clinton Foundation operating from when they accepted donations?
  55. >Ireland
  56.  
  57. What are your thoughts on the Combetta connection? Will it matter at all, or be swept aside?
  58. >It all matters. The problem is the web is so deep and wide that getting the whole picture is hard. It's like a lion trying to eat an elephant. You can make progress, but it is tough to eat the whole damn thing.
  59.  
  60. rigged polls?
  61.  
  62. >If the election were held today, the result would be ~15% HRC and 50% DJT. The other 35% are independent/undecided. So yes, HRC will try to rig the polls, which is why Russia is getting blamed for messing with our election. Of course they are meddling, but they have no real effect. We will simply blame them so microsoft can gain total control over the machines and make sure the vote is counted "properly".
  63.  
  64. How will you combat it?
  65.  
  66. >I do my part by coming here and answering questions. It has been a while, and unfortunately the investigations have stalled so I am not very helpful, but you guys collectively are fighting against the negative perceptions. Everyone thought they couldn't make a difference, now the MSM is openly trying to frame this board and others as right wing extremists to discredit us. That should send a clear message as to how threatening this board actually is.
  67.  
  68. How can we or Trump's camp fight the fake polls and the gaslighting techniques?
  69.  
  70. What about rigging the electronic elections, like the voting machines?
  71.  
  72. >Volunteer to be a Trump election watcher. Try to set up an organization which will conduct independent exit polls (many states no longer require them since most of them showed the Democrat primaries were rigged).
  73.  
  74. What about the supposedly dead FBI agent who was arrested at Trump Tower about a month ago? Any truth to that? Was it an assassin as /pol/ suspects?
  75. >No, just some idiot kid.
  76.  
  77. Current odds of Trump winning in your opinion?
  78. >95% probable Trump victory
  79.  
  80. I have to wonder though, is the hiding of the 302's something the FBI is actively trying to do? Or are you under the gun, so to speak? What can we do to help the house get the information it needs?
  81. >We are stalling because we are stalling. I wish I could explain to you how it works.
  82.  
  83. >Imagine I have three guys working on a project. It's in the purple or SAP-level, and none of them know who is working on said project with them or what the big picture looks like. They're isolated from one another. I tell two to pause and one to stop completely, the project never gets finished and no one knows why. That's the type of stuff going on in the department right now. because I am a big picture guy, I know it's to stall so HRC can run out the clock.
  84.  
  85. Do you know who posted the photos from Pagliano's no-show?
  86. >No.
  87.  
  88. How pissed are you guys at Comey?
  89. >Most senior Intel guys are furious with Comey and the DOJ in general. Grunts at the bottom are confused and do not know enough.
  90.  
  91. could you name some companies/people/events we haven't looked into already but are worth digging?
  92. >What was the roganization that put togehter that ad for HRC with all the celebrities? What major figure who endorsed HRC has business interest tied to the Clinton Foundation?
  93.  
  94. >What constitutes Mark Cuban's Net Worth?
  95.  
  96.  
  97. Are Bill and Obama actively working against Hillary? If she fails miserably, will they try to eliminate her to bury the Foundation scandal forever and protect those implied?
  98. >No. DJT will put her in jail.
  99.  
  100. Was Hillary involved in Scalia's death at least? Does the Clinton kill list theory have merit?
  101. >Not sure about Scalia, the Clinton Kill List is very, very legit. Some are natural causes, but the ones that seem too outrageous, actually are. I forget his name, but the one who claimed to be investigating the Octopus who ended up in a duffel bag locked from the inside, he was investigating the Clintons.
  102.  
  103. If they actually try to rig this election and pin it on a foreign power that would be incredible. I can't imagine the way that would rip this country apart. Would the FBI do anything about it?
  104. >I don't know honestly. So much of my faith in the system has been destroyed this past year.
  105.  
  106. To this end, I'd reiterate the second part of my question: Is there anything that we, and by extension; the american people can do to prevent this investigation from Stalling?
  107. >Keep making noise and bringing people on the board.
  108.  
  109. Does the lord and saviour have any "gotcha" stumps for tomorrow?
  110. >I fully expect him to bring up Bill's past, along with HRC's ties to the CF.
  111.  
  112. Is there going to be anymore happenings soon?
  113. >Keep an eye on Russia
  114.  
  115. Will there be any unscheduled breaks during the debates tomorrow?
  116. >It is hard to say with certainty.
  117.  
  118. So I assume you don't know of anybody else in the agency who feels the way you do about all this? Do you talk about /pol/ or your true feelings about HRC with anybody else or do you keep that to yourself? (For your own safety?)
  119. >Many of my colleagues openly discuss 4chan. We share our thoughts in private, but most of us know what she did was illegal. Even basic intel people have briefings that can last for 10 hours telling us what we can and cannot do with information. You do not need intent to prosecute. We are told this every day, we can be negligent and still get fucked.
  120.  
  121. From your words it looks like Hillary will get what she deserved. How long will it take after Trump is elected?
  122. >I cannot say for sure, but I expect it will be a major issue at the forefront of his presidency.
  123.  
  124. What is your oppinion on the Bad Self Eater phenomenon? A DoD funded project under the Minerva group? A pentagon study to do research on this and other sites?
  125. >The DOD is interested in how the internet is having effects on human interaction and pyschology
  126.  
  127. Were you the one who posted a sole comment recently on:
  128. -Norwegian shipping companies and human trafficking
  129. -The Cambodian ties
  130. -That our efforts are paying off and has delayed one of the Clintons' October Surprise?
  131. >No.
  132.  
  133. How accurate is this
  134. http://truepundit.com/exclusive-fbi-used-agents-as-pawns-to-insulate-hillary-aides-clinton-foundation-from-prosecutions/
  135. >100% accurate. My wife is well, though she doesn't like when I do these anymore. She doesn't want me to get suicidal
  136.  
  137. How important is /pol/ seen? Are we looked at as being influential or just seen as a fringe movement?
  138. >Would the MSM start trying to psychologically frame frog pictures off the internet if they did not believe it was affecting the course of political events?
  139.  
  140. Are recent Bahama leaks worth looking into? How many people from government are having their millions there?
  141. >Could not tell you.
  142.  
  143. Should Doug Schoen/Victor Pinchuk thing be pushed more? Can we find any dirt on Victoria Nuland meddling in Ukraine?
  144. >Victoria Nuland
  145. >You are on the right track.
  146.  
  147. What do you think about all these posters that allegedly leak information and are "insiders"? We had:
  148. -A Fabian Society poster
  149. -High Level Insider
  150. -Anon 5 with the "knowledge bombs"
  151. >The "insiders" are giving out information. Not all of it is correct, some is just fun to think about, others are clearly trying to help me point you in the right direction.
  152.  
  153. What about the October surprise via WikiLeaks?
  154. I believe it is about Hillary's emails that details arming the Lybian rebels that overthrew Gadaffi and eventually over ran the Benghazi embassy. My understanding is that Hillary told congress that she had no knowledge of arms or support going to Lybian rebels. However, if there are emails where she discusses arming Lybian rebels, then it will prove should committed perjury. Do you know of anything about the WikiLeaks' October Surprise?
  155. >I suspect your conclusions are correct. But I do not know what Wikileaks has, and am very much looking forward to reading their material.
  156.  
  157. If USA goes Trump anti-globalist, do the globalist leeches find a new host? Like Germany/EU?
  158. >Try China
  159.  
  160. Obama using Pseudonym On Emails?
  161. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-emails-classified-release-215359
  162. >We leaked this. It just goes to show how corrupt the whole of government is.
  163.  
  164. Was the VIP email stonetear was trying to wipe from email headers Obama's?
  165. >Yes
  166.  
  167. We've seen quite a few attacks in the last week or so: MN knife NY/NJ bombing, Turkroach mall shooting. Are any of these false flags?
  168. Bombings were false flags, everything else is media hype. BLM is a waste of time. The crime rate among blacks is virtually unchanged, it has always been high, the only thing different is the media attention.
  169.  
  170. This isn't related to HRC, but I would like to know: is the Alabama gas pipeline break a result of an attack?
  171. >Yes
  172.  
  173. I was sure the debates would be stacked for Hilldawg but this Lester Holt guy may actually be fair
  174. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/297587-how-lester-holt-went-from-chicago-radio-to-moderating-trump
  175. Hilldawg, it says, was trying to bully him already but it looks like he might have a spine.
  176. >Holt is a pretty stand-up journalist. He knows what his role is.
  177.  
  178. thing that's bothering me personally: are tripfags from /cfg/ observed by the FBI?
  179. >You are being actively monitored, yes.
  180.  
  181. How panicked are they by what not only your group, but what /cfg/ has found? Do you have moles in her campaign & foundation? How about the surrogate organizations who work on her behalf?
  182. >They knwo you won't find anything concrete, they are worried that you are creating negative perceptions of HRC that cannot be whitewashed (which was the whole point).
  183.  
  184. >We have no moles in her campaign.
  185.  
  186. You have always told us to focus on the Clinton Foundation, and not to focus too much on the email scandal. I did some research on the Clinton Foundation's tax returns, and found a lot of issues, especially with the amended tax returns. It seems to me that the Clinton's pocketed a lot of the Haiti money in 2010.
  187.  
  188. When it comes to the Clinton Foundation and the Clintons using it as a personal bank account, is there anything you can tell us that we might have overlooked?
  189.  
  190. Maybe something you have said before, but we have forgotten or been too tunneled vision to see. Basically, not being able to see the woods through the trees.
  191.  
  192. I know the Clinton Foundation started as a project to build Bill's Presidential Library, but then the Clinton Foundation expanded into something way different. Also, I believe you getting people to focus on the Clinton Foundation and people bringing it into the public light is why the Clinton Global Initiative shut down.
  193. >The CF always operates in countries where birth records are difficult to maintain. Let that sink in for a moment.
  194.  
  195. Will we get to see the immunity agreements the DOJ gave all her aides? Why don't they have to cooperate in exchange for the immunity?
  196. >They can take the 5th or get immunity from us. We grant it because we want to know how deep this shithole goes, and they take it because they believe they will be pardoned. We can terminate immunity agreements if the information proescutes someone without an immunity agreement, i.e. HRC
  197.  
  198. How big of an issue will vote fraud be? Is it better to mail in votes or to vote in person? (I'm guessing it depends on the state and what machines they use, if any.)
  199. >It is better to go in person, but it ultimately does not matter because the votes are machine counted.
  200.  
  201. "but now I am starting to think they got a hold of something damaging." What changed your mind?
  202. >We know the Russians got a hold of something in her servers. Tbh, I believe she was planning tos tart a war with Russia, and that the Russians have given select info to Wikileaks to help destroy her campaign. Russia is not the greatest country on earth, but they do not want to be at war with us. The world is weary of conflict.
  203.  
  204. Being a Filipino Trump supporter in the (((Great State of California))), what's it going to take for people to stop considering people like me as an "Uncle Tom"? Also, with California- How connected are the Clintons in this state? Speaking from SoCal.
  205. >Other people's perceptions of you are irrelevant and cannot be changed.
  206.  
  207. >In SoCal, I cannot say. But I do know they helped push immigrants through the border, just like every other politician. but that is the least of their sins.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement