Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [22:43:28] Ketchi: so, does that all mean we can go into open beta now? :D
- [22:44:43] Sarenji: i think so
- [22:44:54] Sarenji: well i'd like to fix buttons also
- [22:45:13] Ketchi: oh yes
- [22:45:18] Ketchi: that's something worth waiting for
- [22:45:22] Blue Kirby: i think the most amusing thing that's happened so far is the username switching thing
- [22:45:25] Ketchi: shouldn't take as long though, right? :)
- [22:45:25] Blue Kirby: i'll almost missi t
- [22:45:27] Sarenji: As of May 2014, we've discontinued operation of Bootstrap v2.3.2's Customizer. It's been nearly a year since Bootstrap v2.3.2 was released. Bootstrap v3 was released soon after, and is now mature. We continue to encourage new projects to use Bootstrap v3.
- [22:45:28] Sarenji: wowww
- [22:45:36] Ketchi: hahahaha, yeah
- [22:45:38] Blue Kirby: oof
- [22:45:50] Sarenji: there goes buttons
- [22:46:01] Sarenji: oh yeah
- [22:46:05] Sarenji: i should restart the server with the *real* branch
- [22:46:17] Sarenji: LAST RESTART
- [22:46:20] Ketchi: :D
- [22:46:45] Sarenji: oh wait
- [22:46:48] Sarenji: let me just fix buttons first
- [22:51:16] Sarenji: restarting
- [22:52:07] Sarenji: done
- [22:52:09] Sarenji: let's get it
- [22:53:26] Sarenji: whoops no topic
- [22:53:30] Sarenji: wonder if anyone has the old one
- Topic: Welcome! We are currently testing new features. Find Battle is back up! Battle to your pleasure.
- [22:54:16] Blue Kirby: lol
- [22:54:19] Blue Kirby: battle to your pleasure
- [22:55:05] Sarenji: would you rather i say battle to climax
- [22:55:10] Sarenji: #1
- [22:55:24] Sarenji: wheres the leaderboard i wanna see me at #1
- [22:55:25] Blue Kirby: yaaay buttons and shit
- [22:55:38] Ketchi: hahahaha
- [22:56:09] Ketchi: and I'm literally the worst :|
- [22:56:21] Sarenji: sux eh
- [22:56:24] Ketchi: hahahaha
- [22:56:39] Ketchi: well, at least I tried, right? XP
- [22:57:02] Sarenji: A+ for effort
- [22:57:06] Ketchi: hahahahaha
- [22:57:15] Sarenji: okay i gotta go. this is a busy week.
- [22:57:21] Ketchi: yep :)
- [22:57:25] Sarenji: work is hosting a party today
- [22:57:33] Ketchi: oh, cool
- [22:57:35] Sarenji: and i slept prob about 8 hours total in the last 2 days.
- [22:57:40] Sarenji: due to pokebattle
- [22:57:42] Sarenji: thanks pokebattle
- [22:57:43] Ketchi: is it in celebration of your awesomeness? ;)
- [22:57:49] Sarenji: celebration of our new office
- [22:57:54] Ketchi: mhmm
- [22:57:55] Sarenji: it's going to be amazing
- [22:58:13] Sarenji: we brought in two new game consoles that the people who use our site made
- [22:58:22] Sarenji: ouya and this arcade game called killer queen
- [22:58:25] Sarenji: so much fun
- [22:58:25] Blue Kirby: your leaderboard and emails will be awaiting
- [22:58:27] Blue Kirby: cheers sarenji
- [22:58:43] Sarenji: gonna shower, come back, and if i can, nap a bit
- [22:58:46] Sarenji: eat, etc
- [22:59:11] Ketchi: mhmm
- [22:59:16] Ketchi: well, I wish you the best :)
- [23:12:07] jegsar: hey cosmic chaos
- [23:19:19] Blue Kirby: anyone here?
- [23:19:59] Sir Monkington: Yep what's up
- [23:20:10] Blue Kirby: can you do me a solid and hop on ladder, just wanna make sure it's working
- [23:20:13] Sir Monkington: Sure
- Ladder match: Sir Monkington vs. The Goddamn Batman!
- [23:27:47] cosmic chaos: it works works the find a battle button works
- [23:27:58] cosmic chaos: but the battles do not work
- [23:34:20] Blue Kirby: thanks for hopping on sir monkington :)
- [23:34:36] Fookiz: making a set for accelgor
- [23:34:47] Sir Monkington: Yeah no problem
- [23:40:02] cosmic chaos: i don.t really like pbv why can.t pokebattle make two types pbv and some other type they make up
- [23:40:26] Sir Monkington: What do you mean?
- [23:42:50] cosmic chaos: like owound like comptive modes and causal modes on this simu
- [23:43:30] xyxx: what would be the difference between them?
- [23:44:04] cosmic chaos: well the diffence wound be luck
- [23:44:07] Ketchi: yeah... ignore cosmic
- [23:44:32] Ketchi: sorry, but can we just mute him already? ><"
- [23:44:59] xyxx: well i think having two modes like that would be quite....
- [23:45:02] xyxx: chaotic
- [23:45:12] Ketchi: silly too
- [23:45:16] Ketchi: like...
- [23:45:19] Ketchi: different tiers, sure
- [23:45:20] cosmic chaos: i don.t play comptive much
- [23:45:32] Sarenji: cosmic chaos, pokebattle is for competitive players.
- [23:45:39] Sarenji: that's our current focus
- [23:45:43] xyxx: Yup
- [23:45:46] Ketchi: yep
- [23:45:46] cosmic chaos: well i can.t find any caual simulatos
- [23:45:52] Sarenji: so if you want different game types, that falls out of our focus!
- [23:45:54] xyxx: To foster a strong, competitive community
- [23:45:58] Sir Monkington: You could play Random Battle on Showdown
- [23:46:03] xyxx: Yeah that's quite casual
- [23:46:12] Ketchi: hmm
- [23:46:12] Sarenji: yeah, that's a good one.
- [23:46:23] cosmic chaos: im banned from that
- [23:46:27] xyxx: LOL
- [23:46:31] Ketchi: definition of "casual" depends on who uses it
- [23:46:32] Sarenji: ha
- [23:46:46] xyxx: Yeah, tbh most people who play pokemon want to win..?
- [23:46:59] xyxx: So, I guess being competitive is in the spirit of most pokemon trainers, if not all
- [23:47:03] Sarenji: well, cosmic chaos, there's always serebii. they are very casual players, and very nice
- [23:47:07] Ketchi: and imo, a good randbats tier can be just as competitive as any other tier
- [23:47:18] Ketchi: like the one I suggested in the feature requests thread
- [23:47:31] Ketchi: it's still Pokemon, and Pokemon is competitive by nature
- [23:47:39] cosmic chaos: well comptive is unoffcal
- [23:47:43] Ketchi: regardless of tier or ruleset
- [23:47:48] Ketchi: competitive IS official
- [23:47:48] cosmic chaos: the rules are
- [23:47:58] Ketchi: we just play unofficial rulesets
- [23:47:59] xyxx: So you want no rules at all?
- [23:48:04] Sir Monkington: Uh
- [23:48:18] Sir Monkington: If you want to play "official" you could go to Nugget Bridge I guess?
- [23:48:29] xyxx: TBH, I kinda want a tier with no rules, where OHKO moves are allowed, sleep clause are not on etc
- [23:48:33] Ketchi: Showdown also has the official tiers
- [23:48:38] cosmic chaos: the internet ruined pokemon
- [23:48:41] xyxx: There's such a tier on a chinese server on PO
- [23:48:58] xyxx: cosmic, from what I understand, you just want easier opponents?
- [23:48:59] cosmic chaos: when those gameboy ones hwere out i just played with firends
- [23:49:14] Sarenji: where are those friends now?
- [23:49:38] Ketchi: he's said before that he never played anything but XY...
- [23:49:50] xyxx: eh... nice xy on gameboy
- [23:50:24] xyxx: Sorry to say this, but we're heading towards a competitive environment
- [23:50:26] Sir Monkington: Is there a word for feeling nostalgia for something you've never experienced
- [23:50:35] Ketchi: no
- [23:50:39] Ketchi: because no such thing exists
- [23:50:43] Ketchi: nostalgia is an emotion
- [23:50:48] Sir Monkington: I think you are a unique case cosmic chaos
- [23:50:55] Sarenji: "the desire to fit in"
- [23:50:56] Ketchi: it's like a psycopath who can feel empathy, it's impossible
- [23:51:04] Sir Monkington: A medical anomaly
- [23:51:19] cosmic chaos: cmptie makes things hard too easy can be boring but to hard can be even more broing
- [23:51:32] cosmic chaos: hard makes it vwey broing
- [23:51:35] Sir Monkington: Ok I don't know what that means
- [23:51:40] Sir Monkington: What is cmptie
- [23:51:44] Sir Monkington: Oh competitive?
- [23:52:00] cosmic chaos: i have one in comptive
- [23:52:02] xyxx: He just wants opponents he can beat
- [23:52:05] Ketchi: there is no such thing as "too hard"... that's what ratings are for
- [23:52:09] cosmic chaos: its not that hard lol
- [23:52:31] Ketchi: cosmic is a troll -.-
- [23:52:34] xyxx: yeah
- [23:52:44] xyxx: a broing one too
- [23:52:48] Ketchi: lol
- [23:53:05] Sarenji: alright
- [23:53:25] cosmic chaos: well trolling fun
- [23:53:33] Ketchi: trolling is against the rules
- [23:53:36] Sarenji: trolling is not acceptable
- [23:53:38] Ketchi: and serves no good purpose
- [23:53:39] Ketchi: yep
- [23:53:49] Sarenji: we want a positive environment here
- [23:53:53] cosmic chaos: it severs good purpose of me
- [23:53:58] Sarenji: if you continue to be negative i'll remove you
- [23:53:58] xyxx: lool
- [23:53:58] cosmic chaos: for me
- [23:54:56] Sarenji: you aren't gonna get far in life with that philosophy cosmic chaos
- [23:55:17] cosmic chaos: negtive is for me not this simu the negtive is not foucused on you its on me so it does not hurt you
- [23:55:19] Sarenji: i highly suggest starting to think about other people
- [23:55:40] Sarenji: i'll let you stew on that for a while
- [23:56:09] Ketchi: uhh cosmic
- [23:56:17] Ketchi: trolling is by nature an act against the person you're trolling
- [23:56:25] cosmic chaos: i have noting tosay
- [23:56:30] cosmic chaos: thats why i do it
- [23:56:31] Ketchi: you can't just troll someone and then go "it's your own fault for getting trolled"
- [23:57:09] Ketchi: well then don't talk at all
- [23:57:11] xyxx: I'm confused, does he genuinely not want to play competitively or not
- [23:57:23] Ketchi: well tbh, I've never seen him play more than a few matches
- [23:57:43] xyxx: are his teams good?
- [23:57:48] xyxx: or hyper beam snorlax
- [23:57:58] cosmic chaos: i don.t play pokemon much
- [23:58:00] Ketchi: his teams are ripoffs of other people's teams...
- [23:58:05] Ketchi: well
- [23:58:08] Ketchi: teams that he's been given
- [23:58:38] Ketchi: "ripoff" is a bit of a harsh word for anyone
- [23:58:58] Transcendent God Champion: Cosmic chaos,
- [23:59:01] Transcendent God Champion: no offense,
- [23:59:06] Transcendent God Champion: but this isn't the right place to troll.
- [23:59:16] Transcendent God Champion: If you want to troll, I have the perfect place for you: http://play.pokemonshowdown.com/ubers
- [23:59:20] xyxx: LOL
- [23:59:22] Ketchi: lol
- [23:59:28] Ketchi: he's banned from there already XP
- [23:59:35] Transcendent God Champion: Oh, haha.
- [23:59:35] Ketchi: for trolling
- [23:59:38] xyxx: I wonder why LOL
- [23:59:41] Ketchi: hahahahaha
- [23:59:44] cosmic chaos: iwrong place i like trolling best on minecraft lol buring peoples hosues down lol
- [23:59:47] Transcendent God Champion: But bans get reset every time the server restarts though.
- [0:00:06] Ketchi: that's called griefing and is in fact debatably worse than trolling
- [0:00:18] Ketchi: interesting, didn't know that about bans
- [0:00:35] xyxx: Lol so you're building your happiness on others' misery?
- [0:00:39] xyxx: Not too bad
- [0:00:50] Ketchi: heh
- [0:01:22] Sir Monkington: You should be a telemarketer
- [0:01:47] xyxx: Transcendent God Champion, I never knew steelskittles was a moderator there......
- [0:01:58] Transcendent God Champion: He was promoted more recently.
- [0:02:04] xyxx: lol and steve angello is voice
- [0:02:13] xyxx: I have nothing against steve angello though
- [0:02:14] Transcendent God Champion: I asked him to ban some members who were planning to troll our forums,
- [0:02:17] Transcendent God Champion: and he refused.
- [0:02:21] xyxx: .
- [0:02:24] Transcendent God Champion: So I asked him to leave our clan.
- [0:02:34] xyxx: Good.
- [0:02:43] xyxx: We have no place for double crossers
- [0:02:47] Transcendent God Champion: ^
- [0:02:57] Ketchi: hehe, that is... debatable
- [0:03:09] Ketchi: you could say that what happens in PS is irrelevant to what happens in our clan
- [0:03:16] Transcendent God Champion: Seriously though, anyone who stays in that filthy Ubers room for too long eventually starts to become one.
- [0:03:19] Ketchi: I'd do the same thing, sorry to say
- [0:03:31] cosmic chaos: the pokebattle guide is too compacalited
- [0:03:40] cosmic chaos: you need to bascic it out
- [0:03:41] xyxx: People need to know about loyalty.
- [0:03:43] Transcendent God Champion: You mean you wouldn't ban someone here if they were planning to troll another forum?
- [0:03:50] Ketchi: yes
- [0:03:58] Transcendent God Champion: They were discussing the trolling on the channel.
- [0:04:09] Transcendent God Champion: So if you were a moderator here,
- Sarenji muted cosmic chaos for 10 minutes ( stop being negative)
- [0:04:21] Transcendent God Champion: and you see everyone here discussing topics like:
- [0:04:30] Transcendent God Champion: "Hey, let's all go and troll GameFAQs!"
- [0:04:35] Ketchi: hmm...
- [0:04:39] Transcendent God Champion: Or, "let's go and troll Serebii!"
- [0:04:43] Ketchi: I get your point...
- [0:04:47] Transcendent God Champion: Would you punish them?
- [0:04:54] Transcendent God Champion: So, what would be your decision?
- [0:04:54] Ketchi: but it isn't exactly our job?
- [0:05:04] Transcendent God Champion: It IS your job.
- [0:05:18] Ketchi: it'd be nice to have a co-founder answer this question ^^
- [0:05:20] Transcendent God Champion: You're meant to prevent people you moderate from doing inappropriate things.
- [0:05:22] Ketchi: I'd side with whatever they say
- [0:05:42] Transcendent God Champion: Discussing how to troll another community is inappropriate.
- [0:05:42] Sir Monkington: I don't think punishing someone here would affect their actions in another place in any way
- [0:05:44] Ketchi: I'd think it's to prevent them from doing inappropriate things on our site
- [0:05:49] Transcendent God Champion: So you punish them.
- [0:05:51] Sir Monkington: You'd want to talk them out of it first
- [0:06:07] Ketchi: oh yes, Monkington is right
- [0:06:09] Transcendent God Champion: They ARE doing something inappropriate on your site.
- [0:06:21] Transcendent God Champion: They're planning an attack on another community.
- [0:06:30] Transcendent God Champion: And discussing it in your chatroom.
- [0:06:33] Ketchi: yeah, as I said, I'd like to have a co-founder answer this
- [0:06:37] Transcendent God Champion: How is that appropriate?
- [0:06:40] Ketchi: it's a very debatable topic
- [0:06:46] Transcendent God Champion: No, it isn't.
- [0:06:51] Ketchi: well, I think it is...
- [0:06:55] Sarenji: i would definitely publicly call them out.
- [0:07:06] Transcendent God Champion: And if they continue?
- [0:07:31] Sarenji: if they continue to talk about it, it's a negative influence. i would tell them to take it elsewhere, (but also highly recommend they not troll communities)
- [0:07:38] Sarenji: and if they don't, ban them.
- [0:07:41] Transcendent God Champion: ^
- [0:07:45] Ketchi: ahh, okay :)
- [0:07:56] Ketchi: I agree with that then
- [0:08:03] Transcendent God Champion: Why do you base your opinion on someone else's?
- [0:08:09] Ketchi: it was something I was very unsure of, but wanted to play devil's advocate
- [0:08:29] Sarenji: cosmic pmed me
- [0:08:35] Ketchi: you need to hear both sides of the story to get a full perspective
- [0:08:41] Sarenji: i told him the next time he trolls he's banned
- [0:08:43] xyxx: Willingness to impose rules is what keeps a community amiable.
- [0:08:49] Sarenji: and he left
- [0:08:49] xyxx: Yup
- [0:08:51] xyxx: LOL
- [0:08:54] Ketchi: heh
- [0:09:00] Transcendent God Champion: [0:08:35] Ketchi: you need to hear both sides of the story to get a full perspective
- [0:09:02] Ketchi: well, it's good to know :)
- [0:09:13] Transcendent God Champion: Why are my opinion and Sarenji's the only relevant ones?
- [0:09:16] Ketchi: not that he's gone, but that he got the message
- [0:09:25] Ketchi: well, my opinion definitely matters
- [0:09:37] Sarenji: maybe he's one of those people that dos servers
- [0:09:38] Sarenji: that would be cool
- [0:09:42] Transcendent God Champion: So basically, you're saying this:
- [0:09:49] Transcendent God Champion: One person (you) is on your side,
- [0:09:54] Transcendent God Champion: and one person (me) is on my side,
- [0:10:08] Transcendent God Champion: so you want a third person to take a side to determine which side outnumbers which,
- [0:10:12] Sir Monkington: Man TGC why you gotta be so sassy
- [0:10:14] Transcendent God Champion: and then decide that side is right?
- [0:10:33] Ketchi: well, that is definitely one big part in it, and the fact that I wanted a co-founder to say it was so that I could get the official perspective on the topic
- [0:10:41] Transcendent God Champion: I'm just questioning one of my own members' way of thinking, that's all.
- [0:10:50] Ketchi: but really, I was unsure, undecided of an ethic
- [0:11:09] xyxx: Ketchi is DM? :o
- [0:11:09] Sir Monkington: Sarenji's perspective ins't necessarily the official stance
- [0:11:10] Ketchi: I wanted to oppose yours so that we could properly discuss it, mainly
- [0:11:15] Ketchi: yep, I am
- [0:11:15] Transcendent God Champion: That which is right is not right because someone says it's wrong.
- [0:11:18] Sir Monkington: I got the impression it was his own opinion
- [0:11:41] Ketchi: hmm
- [0:11:44] Ketchi: well
- [0:11:45] xyxx: OOH Ketchi, do you go on PO?
- [0:11:51] Ketchi: I don't, actually ^^
- [0:11:51] xyxx: Since I don't think i've seen you often
- [0:11:54] Transcendent God Champion: It is an independent on what anyone says, and those who say that something is right say it because it IS right.
- [0:11:54] xyxx: Ah
- [0:11:56] xyxx: I see
- [0:12:01] Ketchi: I was an exception to getting in by my wifi ratings
- [0:12:13] xyxx: What's your tier?
- [0:12:21] Ketchi: XY Battle Spot Doubles and VGC
- [0:12:26] Ketchi: ranked 60th worldwide in season 1
- [0:12:27] xyxx: Oh interesting
- [0:12:33] xyxx: :]
- [0:12:43] Ketchi: and like, second or third in Australia in VGC
- [0:12:50] xyxx: Ah, I see
- [0:12:58] Ketchi: yep ^^
- [0:13:08] Ketchi: Doubles is definitely my tier
- [0:13:12] xyxx: Allow me to introduce myself, my main is Tendetta. :]
- [0:13:26] Ketchi: but yeah, I do understand your perspective on the situation, Champ
- [0:13:33] Ketchi: hi Tendetta ^^
- [0:13:54] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [0:14:02] Ketchi: but in the same way, I won't hide my own perspectives just because you're here reading them, so you can take all this as it is :)
- [0:14:06] Transcendent God Champion: But if I was making a decision like this,
- [0:14:19] Transcendent God Champion: I would act based on my own sense of Justice,
- [0:14:34] Transcendent God Champion: not based on the opinion of the one who owns the place I'm moderating.
- [0:14:39] Ketchi: hmm
- [0:14:41] Ketchi: well
- [0:14:46] Ketchi: these people do set the rules
- [0:14:52] Transcendent God Champion: Mere rules and constructed laws cannot overwrite moral laws.
- [0:14:56] Ketchi: and those rules are what defined what I would do
- [0:15:03] FlamingVictini: guys, my teams are all screwed up
- [0:15:07] FlamingVictini: and reloading won't fix it
- [0:15:15] FlamingVictini: i lost some of my teams and i have someone elses
- [0:15:15] Ketchi: I guess it was a miscommunication
- [0:15:19] Transcendent God Champion: Do you follow any moral code?
- [0:15:29] Ketchi: ethically, definitely, I'd do whatever I could to get people to not troll anywhere
- [0:15:34] xyxx: Ah, but if what they are doing is not condemned by the rules, but condemned by your own moral code?
- [0:15:40] Ketchi: but I would debate whether banning them is appropriate
- [0:15:51] Transcendent God Champion: [0:15:34] xyxx: Ah, but if what they are doing is not condemned by the rules, but condemned by your own moral code?
- [0:16:03] Ketchi: because banning is a thing done by rules, not by ethics, despite the fact that rules are made by ethics
- [0:16:06] Transcendent God Champion: Then I would act based on what is moral.
- [0:16:09] FlamingVictini: guys, can i have someone help me with my team issue here?
- [0:16:09] Sir Monkington: Wait hold on constructed laws can definitely overwrite moral laws
- [0:16:24] Ketchi: I would act based upon rules
- [0:16:25] xyxx: I understand your viewpoint as well, Ketchi.
- [0:16:25] Transcendent God Champion: Not for me.
- [0:16:42] Transcendent God Champion: Why else would I constantly troll Showdown's Ubers room?
- [0:16:44] Ketchi: of course there are exceptions, like discussion of terroism or something
- [0:16:49] Transcendent God Champion: It's against the rules of that simulator,
- [0:16:58] Transcendent God Champion: but I am doing something that is morally justified.
- [0:17:10] Sir Monkington: Well it's justified in your own eyes
- [0:17:31] Ketchi: well...
- [0:17:43] Transcendent God Champion: [0:17:10] Sir Monkington: Well it's justified in your own eyes
- [0:17:45] Ketchi: personally, I have a somewhat twisted sense of morality, and I'm known for that
- [0:17:53] Transcendent God Champion: Meta-ethically, it's more complicated than that.
- [0:18:06] Transcendent God Champion: But I guess I probably shouldn't bring up that topic here.
- [0:18:18] Transcendent God Champion: Many people won't believe me anyway.
- [0:18:18] Ketchi: I therefore rely on things stated by those of an authoritative position to say what is and is not wrong when it comes to acting upon rules
- [0:18:28] Ketchi: but I definitely have my ethics
- [0:19:16] Transcendent God Champion: Those in positions of authority are only human.
- [0:19:25] Ketchi: but you can extend that
- [0:19:27] xyxx: OH
- [0:19:31] Transcendent God Champion: What if they make a set of rules that you cannot deny as being completely unfair?
- [0:19:38] xyxx: NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY SMOGON'S UBER ROOM IS SO CORRUPT
- [0:19:40] Ketchi: yes or no, do you believe it is wrong to follow your own ethics?
- [0:20:02] xyxx: The authorities there act according to their own interests
- [0:20:15] Ketchi: on here, I find that they don't :P
- [0:20:18] xyxx: Yeap
- [0:20:24] xyxx: Altruistic
- [0:20:25] Transcendent God Champion: I believe it is right to follow the moral code which I have detected as being true through my own conscience/sense of Justice.
- [0:20:40] Ketchi: well answered :P
- [0:20:43] Transcendent God Champion: And I don't claim
- [0:20:56] xyxx: Champion, I'm curious, are you a Philosophy major?
- [0:20:56] Ketchi: do you think it's wrong for other people to follow their own ethics?
- [0:20:59] Transcendent God Champion: that this moral code is true only from my point of view or that it is subjective,
- [0:21:12] Transcendent God Champion: but rather,
- [0:21:30] Transcendent God Champion: this moral code is an objective, real, existent thing in the universe,
- [0:21:40] Transcendent God Champion: and I detected it through my sense of Justice/conscience,
- [0:21:43] Transcendent God Champion: in the same way
- [0:21:56] Transcendent God Champion: that people can detect the existence of real things with their five senses,
- [0:22:00] Transcendent God Champion: like sight, hearing, touch, etc.
- [0:22:10] Transcendent God Champion: [0:20:56] Ketchi: do you think it's wrong for other people to follow their own ethics?
- [0:22:32] Transcendent God Champion: This may sound harsh and ridiculous from a superficial perspective, but yes.
- [0:22:45] Transcendent God Champion: If they differ from my own, then they are doing something wrong.
- [0:22:45] Ketchi: okay then, topic solved ^^
- [0:22:54] Transcendent God Champion: It HAS to be that way if you think about it.
- [0:22:57] Ketchi: mhmm
- [0:23:00] Ketchi: I don't think it is
- [0:23:06] Transcendent God Champion: Why?
- [0:23:17] Ketchi: I think that it is equally wrong to follow my own ethics as it is for other people to follow theirs
- [0:23:32] Transcendent God Champion: [0:20:56] xyxx: Champion, I'm curious, are you a Philosophy major?
- [0:23:38] Ketchi: where the primary part of my ethics are to be as non-hypocritical as possible
- [0:23:38] Transcendent God Champion: Sorry, just noticed this message now.
- [0:23:42] Transcendent God Champion: I have two majors:
- [0:23:48] Transcendent God Champion: Philosophy and Film Studies.
- [0:23:57] xyxx: Ah, I see
- [0:24:00] xyxx: Very interesting.
- [0:24:02] Ketchi: albeit arrogant, yet never hypocritical
- [0:24:20] xyxx: No wonder you mentioned Freud
- [0:24:28] Ketchi: for that reason, I cannot say that something is or is not wrong if someone else believes it to be ethically right
- [0:24:38] Ketchi: and therefore, I would rely upon rules
- [0:24:54] Ketchi: things stated as a third opinion, set in stone and for all to understand
- [0:25:02] Ketchi: the true right and wrong
- [0:25:05] Transcendent God Champion: [0:24:20] xyxx: No wonder you mentioned Freud
- [0:25:06] Transcendent God Champion: Yeah.
- [0:25:35] Ketchi: I will therefore never disobey a fair rule
- [0:25:51] Ketchi: now, there are obvious extremes like outrageous terroism
- [0:25:54] xyxx: That's because that corresponds to your moral code.
- [0:25:58] Ketchi: yep
- [0:26:22] Fookiz: dats trii
- [0:26:37] Ketchi: and I can certainly respect a person for being rebellious, like yourself, champ ^^
- [0:26:44] Transcendent God Champion: :)
- [0:26:56] xyxx: I'm going to use a rather extreme example here: In Nazi Germany, most of the Nazi soldiers were instructed to commit genocide by their superiors.
- [0:26:57] Transcendent God Champion: Well, just to get this straight:
- [0:27:04] xyxx: They did so.
- [0:27:15] Ketchi: and I don't think that's wrong
- [0:27:16] xyxx: So.. what were they thinking?
- [0:27:35] Transcendent God Champion: Ketchi, do you believe that morality is something constructed by the human mind, and therefore there's no objective truth to what is morally right?
- [0:27:42] Ketchi: correct
- [0:27:42] Transcendent God Champion: Or do you think like me,
- [0:27:47] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [0:28:02] xyxx: Actually, I believe some specific codes in morality are universal.
- [0:28:03] Ketchi: but in the same way, even math is something constructed by the human mind
- [0:28:26] Transcendent God Champion: [0:27:16] xyxx: So.. what were they thinking?
- [0:28:43] Transcendent God Champion: My explanation is that their rational minds were dissolved due to a lot of brainwashing.
- [0:28:57] Transcendent God Champion: [0:28:03] Ketchi: but in the same way, even math is something constructed by the human mind
- [0:29:02] Transcendent God Champion: So, consider this statement:
- [0:29:19] Transcendent God Champion: "Tortuting innocent babies for fun is morally wrong."
- [0:29:22] Transcendent God Champion: Now, consider this:
- [0:29:26] Transcendent God Champion: "1 + 1 = 2"
- [0:29:44] Ketchi: they both seem like absolutes to me
- [0:29:45] Transcendent God Champion: Do you think that these two statements are the same kind of "objective truth"?
- [0:29:51] Ketchi: yes
- [0:29:55] Transcendent God Champion: Then there you go.
- [0:29:56] xyxx: You know... there is a tribe called the Ik people who actually don't think torturing innocent babies are wrong.
- [0:29:58] Fookiz: this is some deep shit
- [0:30:02] Ketchi: lol
- [0:30:14] xyxx: Are you guys aware of the Milgram experiment?
- [0:30:18] Ketchi: nope
- [0:30:22] Transcendent God Champion: You actually believe that moral values ultimately aren't constructed, but are REAL things,
- [0:30:34] Ketchi: I believe that they are as real as math
- [0:30:37] Transcendent God Champion: and you use your conscience/sense of Justice as a kind of "sixth sense" to detect them.
- [0:30:44] Ketchi: yep
- [0:30:53] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [0:31:05] Ketchi: but it was with intent to belittle math, rather than to uplift morality
- [0:31:22] Transcendent God Champion: Then you can't spout that "I think X is wrong, but someone else thinks it's right, so I'm in no position to act upon my own belief." thing.
- [0:31:29] Ketchi: well
- [0:31:31] Ketchi: in that case
- [0:31:40] Ketchi: almost 100% of the world thinks that 1+1=2
- [0:31:51] Ketchi: so it's a widely accepted truth
- [0:32:04] xyxx: But you see, that is not the same as morality.
- [0:32:05] Ketchi: dismissing whether or not it is actually true
- [0:32:15] xyxx: You can prove mathematics.
- [0:32:17] Transcendent God Champion: How commonly believed in something is is not the same as whether or not is is true.
- [0:32:18] xyxx: But can you prove morality?
- [0:32:23] Ketchi: well, how can you prove a proof?
- [0:32:32] xyxx: Lemme find you a link
- [0:32:36] Ketchi: cool :3
- [0:32:46] Ketchi: I've actually had this debate with my brother
- [0:32:52] Ketchi: and my opinion is this:
- [0:33:07] Transcendent God Champion: Almost 100% of the world believes that the dinosaurs became completely extinct after the Cretaceous period.
- [0:33:10] Ketchi: the majority of relatively intelligent beliefs determines the truth of something
- [0:33:15] Transcendent God Champion: Now, if you see a dinosaur today,
- [0:33:18] Transcendent God Champion: and tell others,
- [0:33:23] Transcendent God Champion: no one would believe you.
- [0:33:31] Transcendent God Champion: Would you deny that you saw a dinosaur then?
- [0:33:38] Ketchi: yes, actually XP
- [0:33:45] Ketchi: because it just seems silly
- [0:33:56] Ketchi: sorry
- [0:34:01] Ketchi: that was a poor response
- [0:34:05] Ketchi: what I mean is...
- [0:34:09] xyxx: I can't find a simple link, but two mathematicians proved 1+1=2 in a series of hundreds of pages
- [0:34:15] Ketchi: I would probably be wrong
- [0:34:28] Ketchi: no matter how right I would think I am
- [0:34:36] Ketchi: and so I would probably think I was wrong
- [0:34:46] Transcendent God Champion: That's a dangerous way to think.
- [0:34:47] Ketchi: now, if I found out something new...
- [0:34:52] Transcendent God Champion: When you think like that,
- [0:35:06] Transcendent God Champion: you essentially allow others to define who you are.
- [0:35:09] Ketchi: hmm
- [0:35:11] xyxx: ^
- [0:35:16] Ketchi: the wrold is defined by its inhabitants
- [0:35:18] Ketchi: world*
- [0:35:19] Transcendent God Champion: Take the game of Pokémon, for example.
- [0:35:33] xyxx: But you shouldn't allow other inhabitants to define you.
- [0:35:48] Ketchi: ahh, but I guess there's something else that I should mention: I would fulfil my role and act as if I saw a dinosaur
- [0:36:15] Transcendent God Champion: Say, you achieve something immensely great in your Pokémon battling career, and come to conclude that you're nothing short of an awesome battler.
- [0:36:20] Transcendent God Champion: But for some reasons,
- [0:36:29] Transcendent God Champion: everyone else in the world insists otherwise,
- [0:36:38] Transcendent God Champion: despite what you have achieved with your skill and efforts.
- [0:36:43] Transcendent God Champion: So, thanks to others,
- [0:37:01] Transcendent God Champion: would you allow yourself to be deprived of the pride you should have made yourself feel?
- Ladder match: Apacheman vs. Woodpile!
- [0:37:26] Ketchi: I would, because it wouldn't matter since nobody believed me; it would have no purpose
- [0:37:40] Ketchi: quite unfortunate...
- [0:37:48] Ketchi: well
- [0:37:49] Ketchi: maybe
- [0:37:52] Ketchi: I dunno, tbh
- [0:37:54] Transcendent God Champion: So in your opinion,
- [0:37:54] Ketchi: it's a hard topic
- [0:38:00] Ketchi: like...
- [0:38:01] Ketchi: for example
- [0:38:09] Ketchi: my placement in the XY Battle Spot Doubles
- [0:38:14] Transcendent God Champion: the ultimate goal of training as a battler isn't to BECOME the very best,
- [0:38:15] Ketchi: initially, I was 59th worldwide
- [0:38:21] Transcendent God Champion: but rather, be ACKNOWLEDGED as the very best?
- [0:38:27] Ketchi: somehow, I was moved to 60th a few months after the season ended
- [0:38:42] Ketchi: I did take a screenshot of being 59th
- [0:38:51] Ketchi: but I can't really back it up past that and my own memory
- [0:38:56] Fookiz: omg actully there is a battle going on
- [0:38:57] Fookiz: LOL
- [0:39:00] Ketchi: so I just tell everyone that I got 60th
- [0:39:10] Ketchi: it's a small example, but it is there
- [0:39:15] Transcendent God Champion: I see.
- [0:39:34] Transcendent God Champion: But how would you respond to my latest question?
- [0:39:38] Ketchi: hmm...
- [0:39:59] Ketchi: I do think it is to be acknowledged
- [0:40:08] Transcendent God Champion: OK, then another question:
- [0:40:21] Transcendent God Champion: Say, all the evidence told you that you're not that good at Pokémon battling,
- [0:40:29] Transcendent God Champion: but many people thought you were the absolute best.
- [0:40:33] Transcendent God Champion: Would you feel proud?
- [0:40:38] Ketchi: yep ^^
- [0:40:49] Ketchi: it's kinda how I feel tbh
- [0:40:52] Transcendent God Champion: We differ a lot, I guess...
- [0:40:57] Ketchi: I don't feel like I achieved my 60th worldwide
- [0:41:10] Ketchi: a lot of the matches were from hax, albeit deserved hax with the majority
- [0:41:26] Transcendent God Champion: That's Pokémon.
- [0:41:26] Ketchi: I do feel like I'm just another player of Pokemon
- [0:41:37] Ketchi: and I can't even get that good at the Smogon XY Doubles Battle Spot
- [0:41:59] Transcendent God Champion: Well, consider this possibility though:
- [0:42:23] Transcendent God Champion: Say many people in the world unjustifiably hated you, or they're too stubborn or arrogant to acknowledge the achievements of others,
- [0:42:41] Transcendent God Champion: or they're too stupid to perceive or draw correct conclusions from evidence.
- [0:42:50] Transcendent God Champion: Due to some flaws on their part,
- [0:43:02] Transcendent God Champion: MANY people don't acknowledge what you have achieved.
- [0:43:06] Ketchi: and that's why I said "relatively intellectual"
- [0:43:30] Transcendent God Champion: OK, but a certain possibility still remains:
- [0:43:38] Transcendent God Champion: Many people in this world aren't honest.
- [0:43:46] Transcendent God Champion: Say you have an enemy who REALLY hates you.
- [0:44:02] Transcendent God Champion: That enemy has seen all the evidence suggesting that you're an awesome battler,
- [0:44:08] Transcendent God Champion: and cannot honestly deny that.
- [0:44:17] Transcendent God Champion: If he was asked if you're an awesome battler,
- [0:44:25] Transcendent God Champion: wouldn't he be likely to say no anyway?
- [0:44:33] Ketchi: true
- [0:44:37] Transcendent God Champion: After all, "yes" is what you want to hear and makes you happy,
- [0:44:37] Ketchi: what's your point?
- [0:44:42] Transcendent God Champion: he wants to hurt you.
- [0:44:52] Transcendent God Champion: So of course, he's not going to answer "yes".
- [0:45:01] Transcendent God Champion: So if many people thought like that...
- [0:45:06] Sir Monkington: I'm not sure that's accurate
- [0:45:18] Sir Monkington: If you're provably good he can't answer otherwise without being called out on it
- [0:45:20] Transcendent God Champion: ...then would you base your pride on their acknowledgement or lack thereof?
- [0:45:43] Ketchi: monkington is somewhat right, but for what I was going to say
- [0:45:43] Fookiz: סמבודיע,
- [0:45:50] Transcendent God Champion: [0:45:18] Sir Monkington: If you're provably good he can't answer otherwise without being called out on it
- [0:45:52] Ketchi: I'd do anything to prove him wrong
- [0:45:54] Transcendent God Champion: He can, easily.
- [0:46:02] Transcendent God Champion: Logic can be used in a million different ways.
- [0:46:06] Ketchi: but I wouldn't really feel any pride
- [0:46:14] Transcendent God Champion: There's honestly like,
- [0:46:18] Ketchi: pride is something only to be felt for those who have achieved where others would fail
- [0:46:33] Transcendent God Champion: an infinite number of ideas people can construct to deny another person's skill at something.
- [0:46:35] Ketchi: so it must be defined by others
- [0:47:00] Transcendent God Champion: Ideas = arguments in this context.
- [0:47:09] Transcendent God Champion: I see, Ketchi.
- [0:47:34] Ketchi: it is about superiority
- [0:47:39] Transcendent God Champion: But I find that I can experience pride in something of mine whose quality only I acknowledge.
- [0:47:57] Transcendent God Champion: Like, say I write a story on WordPad.
- [0:48:03] Ketchi: hmm
- [0:48:03] Transcendent God Champion: I read it, and feel proud of it,
- [0:48:06] Ketchi: well that makes sense
- [0:48:09] Transcendent God Champion: even though no one else has viewed it, ever.
- [0:48:18] Ketchi: because you're the only person able to define it
- [0:48:33] xyxx: Then, given a choice, would you prefer to be somelike like Shofu, who is decent at pokemon and is generally accepted by his viewers as an amazing battler, or someone who is actually the best at pokemon (say #1 in every tier with a 100% winrate) but no one acknowledges his achievements?
- [0:48:36] Ketchi: but that perspective is created from the knowledge of what other people's perspectives would be
- [0:48:54] Transcendent God Champion: I'd prefer being the latter.
- [0:49:05] Ketchi: well
- [0:49:11] Ketchi: disregarding the effort needed for each
- [0:49:13] Ketchi: and all other factors
- [0:49:18] Ketchi: honestly, someone like Shofu
- [0:49:29] Ketchi: I'd feel more proud of the popularity than my competency
- [0:49:47] Ketchi: fewer can say that they're popular than those that can say that they're good
- [0:49:59] Transcendent God Champion: I think I explained this before:
- [0:50:10] Transcendent God Champion: A person's popularity or reputation is not THEIR property,
- [0:50:16] Transcendent God Champion: but the property of those around them.
- [0:50:23] Transcendent God Champion: Did I explain this to you, Ketchi?
- [0:50:25] Ketchi: hmm, but I do feel like it's something to be proud of :P
- [0:50:25] Ketchi: yep
- [0:50:54] Transcendent God Champion: I think it only makes sense to be proud of what actually belongs to oneself.
- [0:50:57] Ketchi: I'd easily trade skill for popularity, assuming equal effort is needed on both parts
- [0:51:21] Ketchi: and as long as it followed my ethics
- [0:51:26] Transcendent God Champion: Tendetta, how would you answer your own question?
- [0:51:29] Transcendent God Champion: Just curious.
- [0:51:56] xyxx: Hmm, I'm torn between the options.
- [0:52:06] xyxx: But to be genuinely the best,
- [0:52:06] Ketchi: fascinating :3
- [0:52:10] xyxx: I'll take it.
- [0:52:15] Transcendent God Champion: :)
- [0:52:23] xyxx: This is like Justin Bieber right
- [0:52:28] Ketchi: hahahahaha
- [0:52:44] Transcendent God Champion: Except, the quality of music IS completely subjective :)
- [0:52:49] xyxx: Would you want to be Justin Bieber, with lots of fan girls, or some underground musician
- [0:52:50] xyxx: lol
- [0:53:30] xyxx: However, given that in the real world, it's really difficult to be truly the best at something, I would strive for something in between.
- [0:53:46] xyxx: And besides, if you're the smartest person in a room, then you're in the wrong room.
- [0:54:16] Transcendent God Champion: I don't agree with that :)
- [0:54:27] Transcendent God Champion: For me, it's like this:
- [0:54:39] Transcendent God Champion: "If you're in a room where you're unhappy, you're in the wrong room."
- [0:55:12] xyxx: Oh
- [0:55:20] xyxx: That's what I believe as well
- [0:55:40] xyxx: Because in the grand scheme of things, how SHOULD we live our lives?
- [0:55:52] xyxx: Every moment spent unhappy is a moment spent badly.
- [0:55:54] Transcendent God Champion: Like this:
- [0:56:02] Transcendent God Champion: Never do anything immoral,
- [0:56:07] Transcendent God Champion: never tolerate anything immoral,
- [0:56:12] Transcendent God Champion: and after having done all that,
- [0:56:21] Transcendent God Champion: aim to maximize the amount of happiness you experience.
- [0:56:32] Transcendent God Champion: That's all to me.
- [0:56:54] Transcendent God Champion: *never, within your power, tolerate anything immoral
- [0:57:01] Transcendent God Champion: That's more accurate actually.
- [0:57:02] xyxx: Yes.
- [0:57:05] xyxx: I completely agree now.
- [0:57:09] Ketchi: hmm
- [0:57:10] Transcendent God Champion: :)
- [0:57:19] Ketchi: you'd need to be really careful to not be arrogant
- [0:57:32] Ketchi: and terroism follows a nearly identical moral viewpoint
- [0:57:58] xyxx: We all do
- [0:58:02] Transcendent God Champion: Can you explain?
- [0:58:05] Ketchi: well
- [0:58:07] Ketchi: terroism
- [0:58:18] Ketchi: I'm sure that as a philosophy major, you've covered it at least slightly
- [0:58:26] Sir Monkington: Putting your happiness first implies putting others underneath you
- [0:58:33] Ketchi: but in my understanding, it's where you attempt to force your own ethics to be a fact
- [0:58:46] Ketchi: ^ that too
- [0:58:49] Transcendent God Champion: [0:58:26] Sir Monkington: Putting your happiness first implies putting others underneath you
- [0:58:53] Transcendent God Champion: There is no choice.
- [0:59:03] Transcendent God Champion: Everyone, even those who claim to not do it, do that.
- [0:59:11] Ketchi: true that
- [0:59:12] xyxx: That's true
- [0:59:14] Ketchi: mods
- [0:59:15] Ketchi: everyone
- [0:59:17] xyxx: LOL
- [0:59:17] Transcendent God Champion: Those who help others ultimately do so because it makes themselves happy.
- [0:59:23] xyxx: ^^^
- [0:59:28] xyxx: There is no true altruism.
- [0:59:30] Ketchi: yep
- [0:59:32] Sir Monkington: Well that's an awful thing to say
- [0:59:33] Sir Monkington: :(
- [0:59:37] Ketchi: but it's true :P
- [0:59:49] Ketchi: can't enter philosophy without detaching yourself
- [0:59:57] Ketchi: unless you want to feel horrible by the end of it
- [1:00:21] Ketchi: right?
- [1:00:30] Transcendent God Champion: True.
- [1:00:32] Transcendent God Champion: But well,
- [1:00:33] Transcendent God Champion: [0:58:33] Ketchi: but in my understanding, it's where you attempt to force your own ethics to be a fact
- [1:00:39] xyxx: [22:58:33] Sir Monkington: Putting your happiness first implies putting others underneath you
- [1:00:55] Transcendent God Champion: But if you don't believe your own ethics to be a fact,
- [1:01:02] xyxx: For me, I do care about other people, and if by putting others underneath myself, I won't be generating the largest amount of happiness.
- [1:01:12] Transcendent God Champion: then what is the point of having ethics then?
- [1:01:21] xyxx: So ultimately, I am still acting on happiness maximization.
- [1:01:27] Transcendent God Champion: Yeah, true.
- [1:02:28] Transcendent God Champion: If you acknowledge moral relativism...
- [1:02:38] Transcendent God Champion: ...and allow other people to act based on their own ethics,
- [1:02:55] Transcendent God Champion: then what if someone believes that "randomly slaughtering people for fun is OK"?
- [1:03:20] Transcendent God Champion: Are you going to say that that isn't an evil person just because what they're doing isn't immoral from their own point of view?
- [1:03:48] Sir Monkington: Well there's always going to be a nutcase
- [1:04:13] Sir Monkington: But we shouldn't assume everyone will decide that killing is ok just because of the actions of one guy
- [1:05:08] Transcendent God Champion: So it's justified to call someone else evil even if they believe that what they're doing is OK, based on their own moral code.
- [1:05:31] xyxx: Again, moral relativism exists.
- [1:05:36] xyxx: It's what you make of it that matters.
- [1:06:09] Transcendent God Champion: So, there's nothing wrong with forcing what one has detected through their own sense of Justice/conscience to be right to be facts.
- [1:06:47] Transcendent God Champion: No, there's no moral relativism.
- [1:06:57] Transcendent God Champion: I explained before, I believe moral values are absolute.
- Ladder match: The Pyromaniac vs. scarface755!
- [1:07:37] xyxx: But a certain person or a culture will have their own moral code.
- [1:07:44] xyxx: Even if there are absolute morals,
- [1:08:00] xyxx: there are examples in the world of people who do not acknowledge some morals
- [1:08:07] xyxx: After a couple of generations of starvation conditions, the Ik, originally a cooperative, child loving tribe, became a group of selfish cruel people who don’t trust or help anybody. They would desert children at an early age and one story Turnbull tells is how after abandoning a baby to be eaten by wild animals the animals were hunted an [sic] eaten
- [1:08:25] xyxx: Deserting children at an early age and leaving them to be eaten.
- [1:08:34] xyxx: That would surely be against the moral code of modern society
- [1:08:44] xyxx: That would be against my personal code as well
- [1:08:51] xyxx: However, it is not against theirs.
- [1:08:57] Transcendent God Champion: But what you're committing is a logical fallacy: the proto-argument from disagreement.
- [1:09:08] Ketchi: well
- [1:09:11] Ketchi: have you seen Star Trek?
- [1:09:43] Transcendent God Champion: "There is widespread disagreement pertaining to moral values across space and time, therefore moral values are subjective."
- [1:09:49] Ketchi: if you have, I'd like to draw attention to Klingons
- [1:09:53] Transcendent God Champion: That is wrong, the conclusion does not follow from the premise.
- [1:09:57] Transcendent God Champion: I haven't, Ketchi.
- [1:10:07] Ketchi: they do not act inappropriately in their own society, but very contrary to our own
- [1:10:17] Ketchi: it's a shame...
- [1:10:26] Sir Monkington: Yes please let's move on to Star Trek
- [1:10:26] Ketchi: it has some really heavy philosophy in it
- [1:10:45] Ketchi: with the prime directive and racial cultures and stuff
- [1:11:15] Ketchi: it crafted my own moral code quite well
- [1:12:24] Ketchi: what, did I really kill the discussion with that?
- [1:12:37] Transcendent God Champion: I'm listening to you...
- [1:13:00] Ketchi: oh
- [1:13:03] Ketchi: yeah, I"m done
- [1:13:08] Ketchi: just wanted to comment on Klingons
- [1:13:12] Transcendent God Champion: I see.
- [1:13:14] Ketchi: it's a real shame that you don't know it
- [1:13:34] Ketchi: (done)
- [1:13:41] Transcendent God Champion: Anyway, Tendetta, think of this:
- [1:13:49] Transcendent God Champion: Say there's five kids in a group:
- [1:14:13] Transcendent God Champion: One believes 1 + 1 = 3, one believes 1 + 1 = 4, one believes 1 + 1 = 5, etc.
- [1:14:25] Transcendent God Champion: There is widespread disagreement on what 1 + 1 is.
- [1:14:33] Transcendent God Champion: That doesn't mean there isn't a truth to it.
- [1:14:40] Transcendent God Champion: Do you get my point?
- [1:14:47] xyxx: Yes
- [1:14:54] xyxx: but i don't think maths is subjective
- Ladder match: Apacheman vs. Richardope!
- [1:15:09] Transcendent God Champion: I don't think morals are subjective either.
- [1:15:10] xyxx: I see the point if you meant different beliefs though
- [1:15:26] Transcendent God Champion: Hmm, how to explain it better...
- [1:15:37] I Got That TM87: Guys
- [1:15:41] I Got That TM87: I just found out
- [1:15:44] Transcendent God Champion: Say you see a tennis ball in front of you.
- [1:15:52] I Got That TM87: that in the mewtwo Pokemon movie you see Gary
- [1:15:59] I Got That TM87: lemme give you guys a link
- [1:16:05] Transcendent God Champion: Because of what your sense of sight has shown you,
- [1:16:08] Ketchi: lol, isn't that a bit off-topic?
- [1:16:18] Ketchi: interested though
- [1:16:21] Ketchi: just a bit off-topic
- [1:16:22] I Got That TM87: http://youtu.be/roMB4NabzNY?t=8m6s
- [1:16:23] Transcendent God Champion: you consider it to be an objective fact that there is a tennis ball in front of you, right?
- [1:16:32] xyxx: Yes
- [1:16:39] I Got That TM87: Was rewatching
- [1:16:45] Transcendent God Champion: Yes, I know it, TM87. It's in the Mewtwo VS. Arcanine and Nidoking scene.
- [1:16:59] xyxx: but my theory of knowledge class taught me to question my senses.
- [1:17:15] xyxx: But yes
- [1:17:28] Transcendent God Champion: Now, if you hear a bell ringing with your eyes, you consider it an objective fact that there's a bell or bell-like sound coming from somewhere near you, right?
- [1:17:34] Transcendent God Champion: *ears
- [1:17:39] xyxx: yes
- [1:17:46] I Got That TM87: Sorry I just came here because I thought I should share it. I didn't realize it when I was younger.
- [1:17:47] Transcendent God Champion: OK, now...
- [1:17:52] Transcendent God Champion: The way I see it,
- [1:17:59] Transcendent God Champion: the "sense of Justice or "conscience"...
- [1:18:06] Transcendent God Champion: ...is no different from the five senses.
- [1:18:07] xyxx: everybody does, schizophrenic patients believe in their visions.
- [1:18:20] Transcendent God Champion: It is, to me, the "sixth sense".
- [1:18:21] Transcendent God Champion: So,
- [1:18:30] xyxx: But if you put it that way, then everyone would come to the same conclusion
- [1:18:35] Transcendent God Champion: if my sense of Justice/conscience tells me what is right and wrong,
- [1:18:54] Wanted Deino: Anyone wants to battle?
- [1:18:55] Transcendent God Champion: I, by the same logic, take what that sense has told me to be the truth.
- [1:19:11] I Got That TM87: Lemme make a quick team to test, Delno
- [1:19:29] Wanted Deino: alright.
- [1:19:59] scarface755: i think morals are subjective
- [1:20:03] xyxx: But if you assume the sense of conscience is a sense like the five senses, then everyone would come to the same moral conclusion in a given event.
- [1:20:19] Transcendent God Champion: No, Tendetta, people don't do that even with the five senses.
- [1:20:29] Transcendent God Champion: For example, someone may be a color blind,
- [1:20:36] Transcendent God Champion: or have inferior eyesight,
- [1:20:49] Transcendent God Champion: and thus observe different things with such senses.
- [1:20:53] xyxx: Hmm, I see where you're getting at
- [1:22:10] xyxx: So, by extension, one absolute moral code is right, while the others are wrong, correct?
- [1:22:17] Transcendent God Champion: Yes.
- [1:22:23] scarface755: thats subjective
- [1:22:25] xyxx: Then what defines the absolute moral code?
- [1:22:28] xyxx: Who defines it?
- [1:22:32] scarface755: society your living it
- [1:22:39] Transcendent God Champion: No one defines it.
- [1:22:41] scarface755: *in
- [1:22:55] Transcendent God Champion: That which is morally good is not good because people say it's good.
- [1:23:15] scarface755: what is morally good is decided by people
- [1:23:15] Transcendent God Champion: People who correctly say that something is morally good say that BECAUSE it is morally good.
- [1:23:28] Transcendent God Champion: No, it's not DECIDED by people.
- [1:23:33] Transcendent God Champion: It's IDENTIFIED by people.
- [1:23:41] scarface755: in most societies we consider practicing cannabilism bad
- [1:23:47] scarface755: but in new guinea
- [1:23:52] scarface755: its acceptable
- [1:24:02] scarface755: their society determines that is bad
- [1:24:07] Transcendent God Champion: Again, that's the proto-argument from disagreement.
- [1:24:21] Transcendent God Champion: "There is widespread disagreement pertaining to moral values across space and time, therefore moral values are subjective." is your argument, right?
- [1:25:12] scarface755: there is no one person who gets to decide whats right and wrong
- [1:25:33] Transcendent God Champion: I agree, no one DECIDES.
- [1:25:37] Transcendent God Champion: They IDENTIFY.
- [1:26:09] scarface755: so how can they be objective then
- [1:26:15] xyxx: Let's say there are 10 rules in the absolute moral code of human beings.
- [1:26:29] Transcendent God Champion: I already explained that in complete detail, scarface755.
- [1:26:32] xyxx: Peter identifies 7 rules, and that is his personal code of ethics.
- [1:26:33] scarface755: hypothetically?
- [1:26:35] Transcendent God Champion: Scroll up.
- [1:26:42] xyxx: Sam identifies 9 rules, and that is his code.
- [1:27:03] xyxx: Is that what you mean, Champion?
- [1:27:15] xyxx: That everyone identifies portions of the same code?
- [1:27:30] Transcendent God Champion: Not necessarily.
- [1:27:36] Transcendent God Champion: What I mean is this:
- [1:27:47] Transcendent God Champion: Everyone, through their conscience/sense of Justice,
- [1:28:01] Transcendent God Champion: TRIES to identify what is morally right and wrong.
- [1:28:07] Transcendent God Champion: However,
- [1:28:15] Transcendent God Champion: if people disagree,
- [1:28:31] Transcendent God Champion: only ONE set of moral rules is absolutely right.
- [1:28:41] Transcendent God Champion: But of course,
- [1:28:48] Transcendent God Champion: in theory at least,
- [1:29:08] Transcendent God Champion: EVERYONE is going to say that what THEIR own sense of Justice/conscience tells them is right.
- [1:29:11] Transcendent God Champion: In the same way...
- [1:29:14] xyxx: Oh
- [1:29:17] xyxx: then I agree
- [1:29:23] scarface755: i dont believe there can be one set of moral rules that can be right over all others
- [1:29:29] Transcendent God Champion: ...if two people look at a tree with green leaves,
- [1:29:33] Transcendent God Champion: and one is color blind,
- [1:29:48] Transcendent God Champion: the color blind people will BELIEVE that the tree has leaves of a different color.
- [1:30:00] xyxx: Because that is what he perceives.
- [1:30:04] Transcendent God Champion: Yes.
- [1:30:10] Transcendent God Champion: But that doesn't mean he is right.
- [1:30:14] Ketchi: welp, my conversation with Victini just ended
- [1:30:18] xyxx: Ah
- [1:30:18] Ketchi: -reads convo so far-
- [1:30:25] xyxx: I agree then.
- [1:30:26] Transcendent God Champion: Only the people who conclude that the tree has green leaves are right.
- [1:30:30] Transcendent God Champion: I see.
- Challenge: I Got That TM87 vs. Wanted Deino!
- [1:30:42] Ketchi: so
- [1:30:44] scarface755: because thats the label we gave it
- [1:30:49] Ketchi: where are we at?
- [1:30:51] xyxx: btw Ketchi, I made a pokebattle thread on our clan forums, feel free to check it out :]
- [1:30:51] scarface755: and in that example you are correct
- [1:30:55] Ketchi: what have people agreed upon?
- [1:31:00] Ketchi: oh, cool
- [1:31:04] Ketchi: shall do that some time
- [1:31:14] Transcendent God Champion: http://dragonmasters.forumeiros.eu/t299-pokebattle-discussion Here it is.
- [1:31:20] Transcendent God Champion: Also,
- [1:31:21] Ketchi: lol, thanks
- [1:31:29] Transcendent God Champion: one of you guys should post this conversation here: http://dragonmasters.forumeiros.eu/t214-interesting-conversations-thread
- [1:31:41] Transcendent God Champion: I was the last person to reply to that thread, so I can't.
- [1:31:45] xyxx: lol
- [1:31:47] xyxx: I will
- [1:31:47] Ethan: How are y'all liking the PB update?
- [1:31:50] scarface755: but say in some other country they were taught that green was really blue
- [1:31:54] xyxx: This was indeed very interesting.
- [1:32:01] xyxx: Ethan, I like it a lot.
- [1:32:01] Transcendent God Champion: True.
- [1:32:03] xyxx: :)
- [1:32:04] scarface755: they would be wrong by our standards
- [1:32:08] Transcendent God Champion: [1:31:50] scarface755: but say in some other country they were taught that green was really blue
- [1:32:13] scarface755: and we would be wrong by their standards
- [1:32:15] Transcendent God Champion: That's just a difference in language.
- [1:32:20] xyxx: Yes.
- [1:32:24] Transcendent God Champion: Nothing to do with what we're talking about.
- [1:32:27] Ketchi: oh yes
- [1:32:31] Ketchi: about that objective truths thing
- [1:32:40] Ketchi: unless proved by stuff like that 1+1=2 thing
- [1:32:44] Ketchi: nothing is true
- [1:32:53] Ketchi: for example
- [1:32:59] Transcendent God Champion: Descartes' demon?
- [1:33:02] Ketchi: a thousand years ago or something, they thought the world was flat
- [1:33:11] Ketchi: they were apparently wrong
- [1:33:14] Ketchi: we might be wrong too
- [1:33:21] Ketchi: yet, we entirely believe it
- [1:33:27] Transcendent God Champion: Yes, I completely agree with your point.
- [1:33:30] Ketchi: and we can act completely as if it is true
- [1:33:35] Ethan: That's great to hear xyxx. Be sure to thank Sarenji and Super when they log in for their "super" work on the sim!
- [1:33:47] Transcendent God Champion: We act completely as if it's true for one reason:
- [1:33:51] xyxx: Ah I already thanked Sarenji !
- [1:34:05] Transcendent God Champion: People HAVE to hold beliefs.
- [1:34:06] xyxx: He was here just now, fixing glitches, evidently working hard for the sake of this blooming community. :)
- [1:34:13] Ketchi: and I agree with that ^^
- [1:34:25] Transcendent God Champion: If someone held absolutely no beliefs whatsoever just because nothing can be proven,
- [1:34:25] scarface755: i agree with that as well
- [1:34:34] scarface755: when it comes to right and wrong
- [1:34:39] Ketchi: but I think that ethics are comparable
- [1:34:43] scarface755: and the way things are defined
- [1:34:45] Transcendent God Champion: they wouldn't hold the belief that "moving one's leg forward allows them to walk",
- [1:34:52] Transcendent God Champion: or "if I eat, I will cease to starve"
- [1:34:55] Ketchi: man, it would be so much easier if you knew Star Trek...
- [1:34:55] scarface755: it works but ethics is a completly different ballpark
- [1:35:07] scarface755: they are comparable
- [1:35:13] scarface755: but its different
- [1:36:12] scarface755: we can all agree that 1+1 is 2 because by definition thats what it equals and anything else would be wrong
- [1:36:28] Ketchi: well
- [1:36:39] Ketchi: if we define 2 as equalling 1+1, then yes
- [1:36:49] scarface755: or 2+0
- [1:37:06] Ketchi: I guess that because math is something we created, it is able to be objective
- [1:37:13] scarface755: exactly
- [1:37:14] Ketchi: ethics... are...
- [1:37:16] Ketchi: huh...
- [1:37:21] xyxx: Everyone holds to their own beliefs
- [1:37:21] Ketchi: champ has a good point
- [1:37:27] xyxx: There may be truth,
- [1:37:34] scarface755: you cant hold your own beliefs on math
- [1:37:36] xyxx: but people may not be able to see it as such.
- [1:37:40] scarface755: its either right or wrong
- [1:37:57] scarface755: but ethics is completly different
- [1:38:05] Ketchi: hmm
- [1:38:07] Ketchi: well
- [1:38:14] scarface755: thats why there is so much variation with different religions
- [1:38:16] Ketchi: ethics, like math, is a construct of the mind
- [1:38:21] Transcendent God Champion: Scarface755,
- [1:38:27] Ketchi: right and wrong are how we define them
- [1:38:30] Ketchi: just like math
- [1:38:37] Transcendent God Champion: did you see my comparison of the sense of Justice/conscience with the five senses?
- [1:38:42] Transcendent God Champion: As I talked about above?
- [1:38:56] Ketchi: if it was between 1 and 1.30, probably not
- [1:39:06] xyxx: I don't believe it's like maths tbh...
- [1:39:11] Ketchi: hmm
- [1:39:22] Ketchi: I don't think we'll agree on anything ><
- [1:39:34] xyxx: Ketchi, so you think maths is subjective?
- [1:40:21] Ketchi: I think it is objective
- [1:40:32] Ketchi: but that anything objective is a sum of the beliefs people have in it
- [1:40:41] scarface755: yes
- [1:41:03] xyxx: So if enough people believe 1+1=4 then it is objectively true?
- Ladder match: xyxx vs. Wanted Deino!
- [1:41:08] Ketchi: yes
- [1:41:19] scarface755: yeah
- [1:41:26] scarface755: we can change definitions of things
- [1:41:35] Transcendent God Champion: So, do you agree that "X is morally right" is as objective as "a tennis ball is in front of me", scarface755?
- [1:41:56] Ketchi: (assuming that there is in fact a tennis ball in front of you)_
- [1:42:21] Ketchi: but anyway, I don't think that is the case
- [1:42:27] xyxx: Then what if people deny that a tennis ball is in front of you?
- [1:42:28] scarface755: no i dont
- [1:42:31] xyxx: What would be the truth then.
- [1:42:59] scarface755: i dont see a tennis ball being in front of someone and say believing that something like abortion is wrong
- [1:43:05] scarface755: as the same
- [1:43:33] Ketchi: honestly, I never understood that whole "abortion is wrong" thing...
- [1:43:40] xyxx: Me neither
- [1:43:50] Ketchi: like...
- [1:43:53] Transcendent God Champion: Scarface755,
- [1:44:00] scarface755: reasons like that is why i think morality is subjective
- [1:44:06] scarface755: im not saying im right or wrong
- [1:44:10] Transcendent God Champion: Seeing something with one's sense of sight,
- [1:44:12] scarface755: its just what i think
- [1:44:18] Ketchi: even the bible comments on souls being given to those who are completely wound together within the womb, not incompletely
- [1:44:22] Transcendent God Champion: and detecting something to be wrong through one's sense of Justice,
- [1:44:27] Transcendent God Champion: what's the difference?
- [1:45:01] Ketchi: idk what anyone else here believes in though
- [1:45:21] Ketchi: but from a christian perspective, I just don't get it
- [1:45:25] scarface755: the difference is that depending on your religious beliefs alters your answer on that where as it doesn't for seeing something in front of you
- [1:46:07] Transcendent God Champion: But things like color blindness, myopia, etc affect what you see, no?
- [1:46:15] scarface755: if something like a tennis ball
- [1:46:19] Transcendent God Champion: So you can behold the same sight as someone else,
- [1:46:25] Transcendent God Champion: and yet come to a different conclusion.
- [1:46:44] scarface755: so your saying someone is seeing something other than a tennis ball
- [1:47:08] scarface755: something that we can define
- [1:47:24] scarface755: with certainty like math
- [1:47:46] scarface755: and something that can change due to religion are the same?
- [1:48:03] scarface755: i dont think they are the same
- [1:48:22] xyxx: I don't think maths and morals are comparably in that regard
- [1:48:40] scarface755: my point exactly
- [1:48:47] scarface755: there not the same
- [1:48:49] Transcendent God Champion: You think that something is moral or immoral because your sense of Justice tells you that.
- [1:49:07] Transcendent God Champion: You think a tennis ball is in front of you because your sense of sight tells you that.
- [1:49:13] Transcendent God Champion: If religion gets in the way,
- [1:49:21] scarface755: yes which changes with different cultures
- Ladder match: Apacheman vs. The Pyromaniac!
- [1:49:23] Transcendent God Champion: what your sense of Justice tells you is distorted.
- [1:49:35] Transcendent God Champion: If myopia, color blindness, etc gets in the way,
- [1:49:44] Transcendent God Champion: what your sense of sight tells you is distorted.
- [1:50:03] Transcendent God Champion: They're comparable.
- [1:51:01] scarface755: the color example doesnt work
- Ladder match: Wanted Deino vs. xyxx!
- [1:51:27] Transcendent God Champion: Well, say the proposition was
- [1:51:28] scarface755: scientists have no way of knowing that what you see as green and what i see as green are actually the same
- [1:51:37] Transcendent God Champion: "There's a yellow tennis ball in front of me"
- [1:51:58] scarface755: what two people are actually seeing is unknown
- [1:52:18] scarface755: but we agree what the definition is that we were given when we learned about colors
- [1:52:25] Transcendent God Champion: So you're claiming that "there's a yellow tennis ball in front of me" can never be objective?
- [1:52:35] Ketchi: it's funny how this all began from judging between choosing what is ethical or choosing what is according to the rules in regards to banning someone
- [1:52:42] scarface755: no that can be true
- [1:53:06] Transcendent God Champion: In the same way, then, "X action is morally wrong" can be true,
- [1:53:08] Ketchi: yup, sorry for the interruption
- [1:53:09] scarface755: im just saying even color itself isnt exactly objective
- [1:53:15] Transcendent God Champion: even if not a single person believes it to be true.
- [1:53:18] Ketchi: have fun, I'm going to bed
- [1:53:19] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [1:53:24] Transcendent God Champion: See you, Ketchi.
- [1:53:27] Ketchi: hopefully we'll get open beta before I wake up ^^
- [1:53:32] scarface755: see you ketchi
- [1:53:34] Transcendent God Champion: Yeah :)
- [1:53:39] Ketchi: actually, it's likely
- [1:53:44] Ketchi: I'll try to wake up extra-soon
- [1:54:02] Ketchi: all the bugs have been sorted out except for the challenge buttons
- [1:54:10] Ketchi: bye :)
- [1:54:15] Transcendent God Champion: Bye :)
- [1:54:59] xyxx: Bye Ketchi :)
- [1:55:04] scarface755: it doesnt matter what you think about color we dont have any evidence stating that what 2 people are seeing in regards to color is actually the same
- [1:55:31] scarface755: as far as shape were seeing the same thing
- [1:55:31] Transcendent God Champion: OK,
- [1:55:50] Transcendent God Champion: but various eyesight disabilities change that, no?
- [1:56:06] Transcendent God Champion: Or someone might have an illusion,
- [1:56:15] Transcendent God Champion: and claim to have seen something that doesn't exist.
- [1:56:56] scarface755: yes they do but eye color still remains subjective even with certain disabilities
- [1:57:05] scarface755: when someone makes a claim
- [1:57:23] scarface755: they have to provide evidence
- [1:57:38] scarface755: or there is no obligation to believe them
- [1:57:49] Transcendent God Champion: OK, consider this then:
- [1:58:03] Transcendent God Champion: At a certain point in time, you are the one and only person looking up at the sky.
- [1:58:09] Transcendent God Champion: You see a shooting star.
- [1:58:12] Transcendent God Champion: You say that.
- [1:58:16] scarface755: ok
- [1:58:17] Transcendent God Champion: No one believes you,
- [1:58:18] Transcendent God Champion: and yes,
- [1:58:26] Transcendent God Champion: they're under no obligation to believe you.
- [1:58:30] scarface755: yes
- [1:58:46] Transcendent God Champion: Does this mean that you consider the fact that there was a shooting star in the sky at the time to be subjective?
- [2:01:34] scarface755: thats a really good question but there isnt a clear answer to it, you would obviously consider it to be objective because of the consensus of what a shooting star is, but if no one else saw it, it would be considered subjective by everyone
- [2:02:42] scarface755: its like saying you saw a ghost
- [2:03:24] Transcendent God Champion: That's not how I see it.
- [2:03:29] Transcendent God Champion: To me, subjective is this:
- [2:03:33] scarface755: you could have seen one and they very well may be real, but everyone needs to agree on it for it to be widely considered objective
- [2:03:36] Apacheman: It seems pretty objetive to me
- [2:03:45] Transcendent God Champion: "Chocolate tastes better than vanilla."
- [2:03:48] scarface755: the shooting star?
- [2:03:53] Apacheman: yeah
- [2:03:54] Transcendent God Champion: "Gold is more beautiful than silver."
- [2:03:59] scarface755: i agree that the shooting star is objective
- [2:04:02] Transcendent God Champion: Things like that,
- [2:04:05] Transcendent God Champion: are subjective.
- [2:04:14] Transcendent God Champion: But that which is objective...
- [2:04:27] Transcendent God Champion: ...is true INDEPENDENT on what anyone believes.
- [2:04:41] scarface755: yes
- [2:04:43] Apacheman: or false.
- [2:04:46] Transcendent God Champion: Say there's a planet made of cheese somewhere billions of light years away.
- [2:04:56] Transcendent God Champion: Not a single person on Earth believes that,
- [2:05:05] Transcendent God Champion: because they can't detect it as it's too far away.
- [2:05:09] scarface755: you would be suprised
- [2:05:12] Transcendent God Champion: But there is still a TRUTH
- [2:05:19] Transcendent God Champion: regarding whether or not that planet.
- [2:05:28] Transcendent God Champion: Truth is independent on anyone's belief about anything.
- [2:05:48] scarface755: yes
- [2:05:51] Transcendent God Champion: *regarding whether or not that planet exists
- [2:05:57] Transcendent God Champion: So yes,
- [2:06:01] scarface755: i was about to say that about the shooting star analogy
- [2:06:05] Transcendent God Champion: back to the shooting star example,
- [2:06:16] Transcendent God Champion: there is a TRUTH about whether or not that shooting star was in the sky.
- [2:06:19] Transcendent God Champion: You saw it.
- [2:06:26] Transcendent God Champion: So unless you question your sense of sight,
- [2:06:28] scarface755: wait
- [2:06:35] scarface755: before we continue
- [2:06:36] Transcendent God Champion: you are completely justified to say it's objective.
- [2:07:15] scarface755: is this shooting star that was spotted by you actually there or is it just you saying you saw one
- [2:07:39] scarface755: it does matter
- [2:07:41] Transcendent God Champion: You're claiming "at X point in time, there was a shooting star in the sky"
- [2:08:13] scarface755: for arguments sake is a shooting star actually there you see it and tell everyone around you that you saw one
- [2:08:22] scarface755: or are you just saying you saw one
- [2:08:41] Transcendent God Champion: You see one, it's actually there, and you say you saw it.
- [2:08:49] Transcendent God Champion: But only you saw it.
- [2:09:00] scarface755: then it is objective and everyone else would be wrong
- [2:09:16] Transcendent God Champion: Why can't the same be said about moral values then?
- [2:09:26] Transcendent God Champion: You're acknowledging that something can be objective
- [2:09:34] Transcendent God Champion: even IF you can't prove it to others.
- Ladder match: .: Victory Star :. vs. PBKing!
- [2:12:08] scarface755: the thing that muddies the water with this is that most things we dont have the answers to because they
- [2:12:14] scarface755: *they're
- [2:12:19] scarface755: not provable
- [2:12:39] scarface755: did a shooting star pass by yes
- [2:12:52] scarface755: im with my friend that saw it and i didnt see it
- [2:13:15] scarface755: i cant take his word for it because he cant prove that it happened
- [2:13:24] scarface755: could it of happened yes
- [2:13:45] scarface755: in that case you would be stuck saying i dont know
- [2:13:57] scarface755: which is the position of most things
- [2:14:47] scarface755: im not a religious person and i dont think there was a flood that killed all life on the planet except a few things on a giant ark
- [2:14:56] scarface755: could it of happened though yes
- [2:15:14] scarface755: it could very well be objective that it happened
- [2:15:24] scarface755: but there is no way of proving this
- [2:15:34] scarface755: but when it comes to things like choices
- [2:15:58] scarface755: like thinking abortion is right or wrong, there is no right answer
- [2:16:02] scarface755: at least not yes
- [2:16:05] scarface755: *yet
- [2:16:41] scarface755: something like that hasn't been widely agreed on by everyone whether its right or wrong
- [2:17:12] scarface755: and it doesnt rely on an event that happened at a given time
- [2:17:46] scarface755: get what i'm saying?
- [2:17:54] Transcendent God Champion: Let me try to understand.
- Ladder match: The Pyromaniac vs. FoSho!
- [2:18:32] Transcendent God Champion: I think fundamentally...
- [2:18:46] Transcendent God Champion: ...we have different definitions of "subjective" and "objective".
- [2:19:06] Transcendent God Champion: You think that which we don't know is always subjective,
- [2:19:14] Transcendent God Champion: even though a truth exists about the matter,
- [2:19:23] scarface755: no i dont
- [2:19:37] Transcendent God Champion: whereas I think that which is subjective is ONLY limited to what is REALLY different for everyone,
- [2:19:39] scarface755: what we dont know could either be objective or subjective
- [2:19:48] Transcendent God Champion: like "chocolate tastes better than vanilla"
- [2:20:17] Transcendent God Champion: So let me get this straight:
- [2:20:37] scarface755: chocolate tastes better than vanilla is subjective
- [2:20:39] Transcendent God Champion: If you're the only one who saw the shooting star, then would YOU say it's objective or subjective that there was a shooting star at the time?
- [2:20:42] scarface755: but it can be objective
- [2:21:02] scarface755: it would be objective
- [2:21:09] Transcendent God Champion: "Chocolate tastes better than vanilla for Person X" is objective.
- [2:21:22] Transcendent God Champion: "Chocolate tastes better than vanilla" is subjective.
- [2:21:35] scarface755: it is
- [2:21:40] Transcendent God Champion: So...
- [2:21:43] scarface755: but it can be objective
- [2:21:44] Transcendent God Champion: [2:20:39] Transcendent God Champion: If you're the only one who saw the shooting star, then would YOU say it's objective or subjective that there was a shooting star at the time?
- [2:22:30] scarface755: its objective but no one would have the obligation to believe that it was objective since you dont have proof
- [2:22:38] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [2:22:49] Transcendent God Champion: Then here's my position regarding morality:
- [2:23:06] Transcendent God Champion: My sense of Justice/conscience tells me X action is wrong,
- [2:23:13] scarface755: ok
- [2:23:15] Transcendent God Champion: so because I detected that with one of my senses,
- [2:23:32] Transcendent God Champion: I'd say it is objectively true that X action is wrong.
- [2:23:40] Transcendent God Champion: But of course,
- [2:23:46] Transcendent God Champion: others wouldn't buy that.
- [2:23:57] Transcendent God Champion: Can you agree on that view?
- [2:24:09] Transcendent God Champion: *wouldn't necessarily buy that
- [2:24:29] scarface755: yes but that's not objective
- [2:24:42] scarface755: its different when it comes to thoughts
- [2:24:53] scarface755: thoughts and actual events is what changes things
- [2:25:09] Transcendent God Champion: But you see,
- [2:25:19] Transcendent God Champion: the way I see it,
- [2:25:23] scarface755: saying you think you saw a shooting star is completely different then actually seeing it
- [2:25:33] Transcendent God Champion: moral values are REAL things.
- [2:25:40] Transcendent God Champion: They exist in the universe.
- [2:25:44] Transcendent God Champion: They're intangible,
- [2:25:50] Transcendent God Champion: and have no physical form,
- [2:25:55] Transcendent God Champion: but they exist in the universe,
- [2:26:05] Transcendent God Champion: they're not just thoughts or constructions of the mind,
- [2:26:17] Transcendent God Champion: and my sense of Justice/conscience detects these real things,
- [2:26:25] Transcendent God Champion: in the same way the five senses detect real things.
- [2:26:51] Transcendent God Champion: You might say I can't prove that.
- [2:26:53] Transcendent God Champion: That's true.
- [2:26:58] Transcendent God Champion: I indeed can't prove that.
- [2:27:10] Transcendent God Champion: But I can't prove that ANY of what I hear or see is real either,
- [2:27:18] Transcendent God Champion: due to descartes' demon.
- Ladder match: FoSho vs. .: Victory Star :.!
- [2:29:32] scarface755: yes
- [2:32:51] scarface755: anything that is subjective can change at any time to objective given a change in agreement, but not everything objective can change to subjective
- [2:33:38] Transcendent God Champion: That's not how I see it.
- [2:33:43] Transcendent God Champion: Consider this question:
- [2:33:51] Transcendent God Champion: "Is there a planet out there made of cheese?"
- [2:34:03] Transcendent God Champion: People would answer: "I don't know"
- [2:34:09] scarface755: yes
- [2:34:10] Transcendent God Champion: No one can prove yes or no,
- [2:34:14] scarface755: there could be one
- [2:34:18] scarface755: there may not be one
- [2:34:22] Transcendent God Champion: but it's still an objective matter to me.
- [2:34:23] scarface755: there is no way of knowing
- [2:34:33] scarface755: doesnt matter what you think it is
- [2:34:33] Transcendent God Champion: Can you see how that matter is different from:
- [2:34:37] scarface755: without evidence
- [2:34:48] Transcendent God Champion: "Which tastes better, chocolate or vanilla?"
- [2:34:59] Transcendent God Champion: The above question's answer is different for EVERYONE.
- [2:35:03] scarface755: yes
- [2:35:06] scarface755: but that can change
- [2:35:09] Transcendent God Champion: There is NO objective truth whatsoever to that question,
- [2:35:14] Transcendent God Champion: No, it can't.
- [2:35:18] Transcendent God Champion: It will NEVER change.
- [2:35:22] scarface755: yes, at least not right now
- [2:35:24] scarface755: it can
- [2:35:30] scarface755: is it plausible
- [2:35:32] scarface755: yes
- [2:35:39] scarface755: but extremely unlikely
- [2:35:56] Transcendent God Champion: But "is there a planet made of cheese?" IS an objective matter, and we CAN determine an answer someday.
- [2:36:05] scarface755: you can get everyone in the world to agree that vanilla is better than chocolat
- [2:36:22] scarface755: as unlikely as it is
- [2:36:43] scarface755: we dont no the answer to that
- [2:36:48] Transcendent God Champion: No, it doesn't work that way.
- [2:36:58] scarface755: we dont know if there is a definate size to the universe yet
- [2:37:05] Transcendent God Champion: Objectivity and subjectivity has nothing to do with people's agreements on the matter.
- [2:37:23] scarface755: theres no way of knowing if there could possibly be a planet made out of cheese
- [2:37:24] Transcendent God Champion: That which is objective: There is a TRUTH.
- [2:37:33] scarface755: it has everything to do with it
- [2:37:37] scarface755: yes
- [2:37:37] Transcendent God Champion: That which is subjective: There is NO universal truth for everyone.
- [2:37:39] Transcendent God Champion: That's it.
- [2:37:42] scarface755: yes
- [2:37:48] ausogle: Np
- [2:37:52] ausogle: moop
- [2:37:56] Transcendent God Champion: It has nothing to do with whether or not something can be proven to others.
- [2:38:17] ausogle: Hey guys! theres no mods! NO RULES!!!!
- [2:38:29] Transcendent God Champion: "Is there a planet made of cheese?" - Even if no one knows the answer, an objective truth on the matter exists.
- [2:38:33] Transcendent God Champion: Either yes or no.
- [2:38:44] ausogle: does find battle work?
- [2:38:46] scarface755: yes
- [2:38:47] ausogle: yet
- [2:38:51] ausogle: cool
- [2:39:08] Transcendent God Champion: But "does chocolate taste better than vanilla?" - The truth on this matter doesn't even exist if it's not relative to a person.
- [2:39:23] Transcendent God Champion: THAT'S the difference between objective and subjective.
- Ladder match: FoSho vs. ausogle!
- [2:39:35] Transcendent God Champion: Whether or not you can prove something to others has nothing to do with it.
- [2:39:41] scarface755: i agree
- [2:39:47] Transcendent God Champion: How many people agree on the matter has nothing to do with it.
- [2:40:02] scarface755: you cant prove that vanilla is better than chocolate
- [2:40:09] scarface755: you can give your opinions
- [2:40:14] Transcendent God Champion: Exactly.
- [2:40:56] scarface755: but it could one day be objective that vanilla is better than chocolate
- [2:41:11] scarface755: if everyone agrees that it is
- [2:41:23] Transcendent God Champion: No, it couldn't.
- [2:41:24] scarface755: just like the answers to math can change
- [2:41:35] scarface755: does 1+1=2
- [2:41:56] Transcendent God Champion: Because vanilla tasting better than chocolate would STILL be relative to every person who tastes that way.
- [2:42:18] scarface755: does 1+1=2
- [2:42:21] Transcendent God Champion: Everyone agreeing that vanilla tastes chocolate doesn't mean that matter isn't subjective.
- [2:42:46] scarface755: im giving you a different example does 1+1=2
- [2:42:54] Transcendent God Champion: Yes.
- [2:43:07] scarface755: would you say this is objective or subjective
- [2:43:12] Transcendent God Champion: Objective.
- [2:43:18] scarface755: and i would agree
- [2:43:21] scarface755: however
- [2:44:10] scarface755: if you got every single person on this planet to agree that it should equal 3 and that was the new rule, 1+1 would now equal 3
- [2:44:26] scarface755: it would then become objective that 1+1=3
- Ladder match: blissey vs. .: Victory Star :.!
- [2:44:39] scarface755: same way with ice cream flavor
- [2:44:59] scarface755: extremely unlikely yes
- [2:45:11] scarface755: but plausible none the less
- [2:45:13] Transcendent God Champion: No,
- [2:45:26] Transcendent God Champion: 1 + 1 = 3 wouldn't be the objective truth even in that scenario.
- [2:45:27] Transcendent God Champion: But eh,
- [2:45:35] Transcendent God Champion: let's just say that our definitions are different.
- [2:45:37] Transcendent God Champion: Ultimately,
- [2:45:43] scarface755: yes it would
- [2:45:46] Transcendent God Champion: our disagreement is on a matter of semantics.
- [2:45:53] scarface755: we as humans invented math
- [2:46:09] Transcendent God Champion: We fundamentally define "objective" and "subjective" differently.
- [2:46:52] scarface755: i dont see how you dont agree with this
- [2:47:01] scarface755: numbers are a human construct
- [2:47:09] Luxuryball13: anyone wanna battle
- [2:47:16] Luxuryball13: i wanna test my team'
- [2:47:22] scarface755: the answers to the numbers we made up are also human inventions
- [2:47:29] scarface755: they can be subject to change
- [2:47:53] Transcendent God Champion: I can agree with this alternate way of looking at it:
- [2:47:57] Luxuryball13: :/
- [2:48:07] Transcendent God Champion: 1 + 1 = 3 would be an objective truth if...
- [2:48:17] scarface755: sorry luxury lol
- [2:48:19] Transcendent God Champion: ...LANGUAGE changes,
- [2:48:23] Luxuryball13: It's alright
- [2:48:31] Luxuryball13: I just want to test it
- [2:48:33] scarface755: language has nothing to do with it
- [2:48:36] Luxuryball13: Doesn't have to be ladder
- [2:48:36] Transcendent God Champion: such that "3" now refers to what was once referred to as "2"?
- [2:48:38] Transcendent God Champion: *.
- [2:48:52] scarface755: thats what im saying
- [2:49:03] scarface755: thats exactly what i was getting at
- [2:49:08] scarface755: it can change
- [2:49:21] Transcendent God Champion: OK, but by that point of view,
- [2:49:26] Transcendent God Champion: absolute EVERYTHING is subjective.
- [2:49:34] scarface755: no
- [2:49:43] Transcendent God Champion: Name something that's objective then.
- Ladder match: HisFavoriteTier vs. .: Victory Star :.!
- [2:49:52] Transcendent God Champion: I can tell you how it can be otherwise.
- [2:49:53] scarface755: the year i was born
- [2:50:02] Transcendent God Champion: Which year is it?
- [2:50:09] scarface755: 1994
- [2:50:16] Transcendent God Champion: OK.
- [2:50:17] Twisted Cosmos: shit son
- [2:50:23] Transcendent God Champion: So let's say,
- [2:50:26] Twisted Cosmos: I should be proud for beating scar several times then
- [2:50:29] Transcendent God Champion: language changes,
- [2:50:38] Transcendent God Champion: so what we now refer to as "4"
- [2:50:41] scarface755: whys that?
- [2:50:46] Transcendent God Champion: is now referred to as "9".
- [2:50:49] scarface755: yes
- [2:50:56] Twisted Cosmos: im '96
- [2:51:01] Transcendent God Champion: So then it will be an objective truth that you were born in 1999.
- [2:51:23] scarface755: if you could get everyone in the world to agree on that then yes you would be correct
- [2:51:36] scarface755: but until that point it is objective
- [2:51:57] Transcendent God Champion: Then I stick to what I said before:
- [2:52:17] Transcendent God Champion: The definition of the words "objective" and "subjective" are different for you than for me.
- [2:52:23] Transcendent God Champion: It's a semantic disagreement.
- [2:52:35] Transcendent God Champion: We can't discuss anything more, it won't get anywhere.
- [2:52:44] Transcendent God Champion: But, I enjoyed this debate anyway :)
- [2:52:50] FoSho: this reminds me of the "is your red my red" debate
- [2:52:59] scarface755: objective (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
- [2:53:43] scarface755: subjective- based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. "his views are highly subjective"
- [2:54:00] scarface755: my year of birth being in 1994 is objective
- [2:54:14] Twisted Cosmos: lol I'm so glad we don't have those kinds of debates in pharmacy school
- [2:54:32] scarface755: i would be scared if you did
- [2:54:34] FoSho: scarface
- [2:54:39] FoSho: let me give you a scenario
- [2:54:42] scarface755: ok
- [2:54:55] FoSho: suppose that me and you meet randomly
- [2:54:59] scarface755: ok
- [2:55:01] FoSho: and we see an apple
- [2:55:04] scarface755: ok
- [2:55:08] FoSho: we both agree the apple is red
- [2:55:11] scarface755: ok
- [2:55:19] FoSho: and we then turn and walk our seperate ways
- [2:55:20] FoSho: however
- [2:55:23] Transcendent God Champion: Tendetta, can you update your post to include the whole conversation so far?
- [2:55:43] FoSho: how do you know that the red colour that you saw is the same as the red colour that i saw?
- [2:55:59] Transcendent God Champion: Showering, be right back.
- [2:56:01] FoSho: perhaps there is some abnormality in your brain where
- [2:56:01] scarface755: it isnt
- [2:56:10] Luxuryball13: At least I got to test it
- [2:56:14] FoSho: your perception of colours is different
- [2:56:20] scarface755: there is no evidence to support that or no way of testing that
- [2:56:27] FoSho: yes there isnt
- [2:56:43] FoSho: but the thing is even though if this is the case
- [2:56:50] scarface755: we could be seeing 2 different colors
- [2:56:54] xyxx: Transcendent God Champion, I refreshed the page, so i don't have the log anymore.
- [2:56:55] FoSho: and one may be wrong and one might be right
- [2:57:05] FoSho: or even both wrong
- [2:57:19] scarface755: we just agree with the same label
- [2:57:22] FoSho: objectively we are both right correct?
- [2:57:26] FoSho: yeah exactly
- [2:57:34] scarface755: no right answer
- [2:57:37] scarface755: we dont know
- [2:57:47] FoSho: what you have labeled red may actually be green in your eyes
- [2:57:56] FoSho: but it doesnt make a difference at all in your life
- [2:58:06] scarface755: no not really
- [2:58:46] FoSho: because essentially you will always say the right colour in the end even if you percieve it differently
- [2:58:55] FoSho: so does this fall under objectiveness?
- [2:59:12] FoSho: because the facts that you have
- [2:59:12] scarface755: the label we give colors is objective
- [2:59:16] FoSho: are different to mine
- [2:59:19] scarface755: the actual color isnt
- [2:59:35] FoSho: but they are essentially correct for ourselve
- [2:59:51] scarface755: fosho we both agree with each other
- [3:00:34] FoSho: im just trying to understand what TG disagrees with
- [3:00:59] scarface755: ill give you an example of something we didnt agree on
- [3:01:47] scarface755: "vanilla is better than chocolate" is this subjective or objective
- [3:01:55] Apacheman: subjective
- [3:02:20] scarface755: i agree
- [3:02:33] FoSho: subjective yes
- [3:03:00] scarface755: now if we got everyone in the world to agree that vanilla is better than chocolate is it now objective or subjective
- Ladder match: blissey vs. .: Victory Star :.!
- [3:03:26] FoSho: depends
- [3:03:42] FoSho: the problem with this example is how are they agreeing
- [3:03:57] FoSho: are they agreeing based on tasting it or what
- [3:04:38] FoSho: though i would still think its subjective because thats the case with chocolate. Almost the entire world loves chocolate
- [3:04:41] FoSho: my mom doesnt
- [3:04:57] scarface755: everyone has tasted both and sencerely agrees that vanilla is better than chocolate
- [3:04:57] FoSho: we subjectively love chocolate because of our own particular taste
- [3:05:49] scarface755: for arguments sake this is the conditions
- [3:06:01] scarface755: everyone in the world has tried both
- [3:06:11] scarface755: and sincerely agrees that vanilla is better
- [3:06:17] scarface755: is it now objective or subjective
- [3:06:42] FoSho: I think in this particular scenario
- [3:06:54] FoSho: you can put it as both
- [3:06:58] scarface755: how so
- [3:07:01] FoSho: because
- [3:07:52] FoSho: taste pathway coincidies with the limbic system
- [3:07:58] scarface755: something cannot be both objective and subjective at the same time
- [3:07:59] FoSho: the limbic system is your emotions
- [3:08:01] scarface755: by definition
- [3:08:08] FoSho: however
- [3:08:29] FoSho: seeing as EVERYONE is agreeing to it you can also argue that its an objective fact
- [3:08:48] FoSho: kinda like them saying chocolate is better than sewer water
- [3:09:03] FoSho: i think that if a variation arrived
- [3:09:11] FoSho: if 1 person was born in the world
- [3:09:24] FoSho: who preferred chocolate over vanilla
- [3:09:34] scarface755: then it would no longer be objective
- [3:09:36] FoSho: then it would revert back to subjectiveness completely
- [3:09:45] scarface755: thats my point
- [3:10:01] scarface755: he didnt think that something subjective could become objective
- [3:10:15] FoSho: I think its interchangeable in this specific example
- [3:10:37] scarface755: its plausible although extremely unlikely
- [3:10:45] FoSho: thing is though
- [3:10:51] FoSho: tell me this
- [3:11:14] FoSho: if you asked chocolate vs sewer water
- [3:11:33] FoSho: would you say the taste be objective or subjective
- [3:11:42] scarface755: i would say chocolate although i dont think their fair comparisons
- [3:11:58] scarface755: i think most would agree chocolate is better
- [3:12:05] scarface755: but i cant say that for certain
- [3:12:11] FoSho: it would be subjective
- [3:12:13] FoSho: because
- [3:12:16] scarface755: yes i agree
- [3:12:20] scarface755: it would be subjective
- [3:12:26] FoSho: there are people in this world who are allergic to chocolate
- [3:12:50] FoSho: objectiveness is hard facts
- [3:13:13] FoSho: however, one thing you have to agree on
- [3:13:22] FoSho: is that there are people in this world
- [3:13:26] FoSho: who mix the two up
- [3:13:31] scarface755: yes
- [3:13:40] FoSho: their emotions cloud their judgement
- [3:13:57] scarface755: objectivness doesnt have to deal with emotions
- [3:14:12] FoSho: one interesting thing
- [3:14:20] FoSho: in my psychiatry rotations
- [3:14:28] FoSho: when ive taken history of patients
- [3:14:39] FoSho: we devide it into objective and subjective
- [3:14:49] FoSho: objective is what the patient is telling us
- [3:15:16] FoSho: subjective is what we are observing eg if we look at the patients body language and think hes sad etc
- [3:15:27] scarface755: i agree
- [3:15:52] FoSho: thats one of the ways a psych history is taken
- [3:16:05] Twisted Cosmos: my team was 995 points a few days ago
- [3:16:12] Twisted Cosmos: now it's 970
- [3:16:16] Twisted Cosmos: not bad
- [3:16:21] FoSho: they changed the PBV twisted cosmos
- [3:16:37] FoSho: try making a team with mega kangheskhan now :P
- [3:16:37] scarface755: i have to work my way back up the latter
- [3:16:48] scarface755: i was mid 1700s
- [3:16:55] scarface755: for points
- [3:16:56] Twisted Cosmos: WHAT
- [3:17:00] Twisted Cosmos: THEY RESET THE LADDER
- [3:17:04] Twisted Cosmos: just notices :'(
- [3:17:04] scarface755: yes
- [3:17:07] Twisted Cosmos: noticed*
- [3:17:08] FoSho: unfortunately all the good players are online right now
- [3:17:13] scarface755: lol
- [3:17:17] FoSho: so my ratings are falling :P
- [3:17:32] FoSho: only started playing pokemon competitively when this site started :P
- Ladder match: PokeyMcGee vs. .: Victory Star :.!
- [3:18:05] scarface755: apacheman and blissey are only 2 that give me alot of trouble
- [3:18:30] FoSho: you mean medicham?
- [3:18:42] scarface755: no
- [3:18:49] scarface755: i meant actual players
- [3:18:57] FoSho: oh right :P
- [3:19:10] blissey: im 0-2 lol
- [3:19:15] FoSho: all of them give me trouble unless they are relatively new :P
- Ladder match: scarface755 vs. shinylugia!
- Ladder match: PokeyMcGee vs. .: Victory Star :.!
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement