Trapwire Stratfor Email 18

Date 	2010-01-27 00:47:38
From 	Blake.Sawyer@txdps.state.tx.us
To 	burton@stratfor.com
Others 	MessageId:
InReplyTo: 1471442210-1264545759-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-154997219-@bda529.bisx.prod.on.blackberry
Text
Only thing so far is a meeting with sen williams on thurs. Will be
interesting to see what is discussed at the commission mtg on friday.
Grant was turned in yesterday, so it looks like that money will get used.
I'll keep you posted.

----- Original Message -----
From: burton@stratfor.com
To: Sawyer, Blake
Sent: Tue Jan 26 17:06:03 2010
Subject: Re: Close-Hold

Any movement?

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: "Sawyer, Blake"
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:44:09
To: Fred Burton
Subject: RE: Close-Hold

Nope... I've submitted my recommendations with a heavy emphasis on
TRAPWIRE and 100% digital CCTV upgrades for the entire Capitol, but have
been told that all recommendations will be passed up to the
legislature/committees for a decision. As long as DPS is charged with
securing a public building without "owning" any of the physical
systems/hardware OR the ability to implement critical security measures
without the approval of an arguing, indecisive body of untrained,
self-proclaimed, security experts, I fear the public and the stakeholders
in the complex will remain soft targets for domestic violence and acts of
terrorism.



-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Burton [mailto:burton@stratfor.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Sawyer, Blake
Subject: Re: Close-Hold

Any traction?

Sawyer, Blake wrote:
> Sir,
>
>
>
> Sent this email out this morning....
>
>
>
> *From:* Sawyer, Blake
> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 9:19 AM
> *To:* Bodisch, Robert; Jones, John
> *Cc:* McCraw, Steven; Beckworth, Lamar
> *Subject:* REC/SECURITY EST - CAPITOL
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Sir,
>
>
>
> *I. **_TRAPWIRE (Initial deployment/install
> $252,000.00 - Annual Recurring Fee $151,000)_*
>
>
>
> 1) These prices are tied to the GSA Schedule, which means they will
> not change with CONUS deployments of TRAPWIRE. Only thing that would
> increase the price at this point would increasing the number of
> trainees. Given what happened yesterday, I would think the Capitol
> would want to train as many people as possible. They have two courses:
> TPOP for security professionals (this is the course I attended with 50
> Troopers / SO's) and a two hour TPOC course for non-security
> professionals (i.e. vendors, groundskeepers, others who work in/around
> the complex). This second course is a two-hour class designed to
> sensitize attendees to terrorist/criminal surveillance techniques, but
> doesn't delve as deeply into case studies and other sensitive areas.
> It's also offered in full Spanish.
>
> 2) In the event we are querried re. who else is using the system,
> we can start with something general like "Several major city police
> departments and one overseas government". If we are pressed for
> specifics, we can advise them that Nevada Counterterrorism Center in Las
> Vegas under Tom Monahan is a client, although we can't disclose any of
> the specific casinos that are linked in (more than 60 right now).
>
> 3) It would also help, I think, to advise them that LAPD (Commander
> Joan McNamara) is a client and advocate of the system. This is
> important b/c she is the driving force behind the SAR initiative being
> run with all the major city police chiefs and TRAPWIRE's role therein.
>
>
>
> . We can't openly disclose other major clients that I'll brief
> you on personally.
>
> . They have initiated a new training program for LE and Security
> professionals to use when confronting suspicious individuals.
> Specifically, how do you elicit intelligence and detect deception in a
> non-threatening and legal manner. This course will be customized
> specifically for Texas state law and will be available in March. All
> training courses run about $300 per head.
>
>
>
> *II. **_CAMERAS/SERVERS/RECORDERS ($427,000.00)_*
>
>
>
> 1) Recommend upgrade of all existing cameras and associated
> equipment to 100% digital. This will involve replacing many of the
> existing "legacy" cameras, while linking in all that we can into the new
> system.
>
>
>
> 2) Recommend upgrading all existing cameras (about 130) to Sony
> high speed dome cameras w/ 540 lines resolution or better or equivalent.
> (Sony model # CD55NV-36S is ideal for indoor/outdoor applications and
> run $1K each). Existing cameras are divided b/w 1992, 1996, and 2001
> models with a few newer replacements (but poor quality) units. In
> order to cover the dead space inside and outside the building, we need
> 125 additional cameras. Why? Because currently we only have good
> coverage on the great walk on the southside and the bollards to the
> north. Everything else is dead space and covering the grates/windows
> with cameras is much more economical than wiring them shut. All of the
> new cameras will need CAT-5 run to them which runs approx $1 per foot to
> install.
>
>
>
> Total Cost of Recommended Cameras: $255K
>
> Total Est Cost of New Camera Labor (est. 300'+ ft per camera): $78K
>
> Total Est Cost of New Servers (3 Total): $24K (Recommend DELL Quad Core
> Xeon Server E5450 or equivalent from another company. These run $8K each
> and we need two on ops and a backup).
>
> Total Est Cost of New NVR's (2 Total) w/ 25T of Storage: $20K
>
> Total Est Cost of New Monitors: $15K
>
> Total Est Cost Monitoring Software: $35K
>
> Grand Est Total: $427,000.00
>
>
>
> *III. **METAL DETECTORS/CARD SCAN ACCESS POINTS/BASEMENT
> - TUNNEL TURNSTYLES (in original proposal) *
>
> *IV. **MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (Reney has
> numbers/details on this)*
>
> *V. **WirelessWerx 911 Nodes (Proposal due into me by
> noon today) *
>
> * *
>
> * *
>
> *I'll have additional data available NLT noon today.*
>
> * *
>
> *S/F,*
>
> * *
>
> *Blake*
>
> * *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it are
> intended solely for the use of the addressees and may contain legally
> privileged, protected or confidential information. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email
> reply and please delete this message from your computer and destroy any
> copies.
>