Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ==1436== Memcheck, a memory error detector
- ==1436== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
- ==1436== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
- ==1436== Command: ./classifier_lda
- ==1436==
- vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xC5 0xF9 0x57 0xC0 0xE8 0x73 0x4 0xFF
- ==1436== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x513f214.
- ==1436== at 0x513F214: _GLOBAL__sub_I_Math.cpp (Math.h:374)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
- ==1436== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
- ==1436== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
- ==1436== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
- ==1436== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
- ==1436== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
- ==1436== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
- ==1436== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
- ==1436== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
- ==1436== probably kill your program.
- ==1436==
- ==1436== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
- ==1436== Illegal opcode at address 0x513F214
- ==1436== at 0x513F214: _GLOBAL__sub_I_Math.cpp (Math.h:374)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== HEAP SUMMARY:
- ==1436== in use at exit: 3,793 bytes in 15 blocks
- ==1436== total heap usage: 19 allocs, 4 frees, 11,933 bytes allocated
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 5 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61322: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 6 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F613FA: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 6 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F614D2: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F68288: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61349: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F68288: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61421: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F68288: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F614FC: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 136 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 7 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61A94: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6129B: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 136 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 8 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61A94: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6137A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 136 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 9 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61A94: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61452: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 10 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6829A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F614FC: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 11 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6829A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61349: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 12 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6829A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61421: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 672 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 13 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F60B41: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61293: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 672 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 14 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F60B41: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F61372: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== 672 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 15 of 15
- ==1436== at 0x4C2B3F8: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
- ==1436== by 0x8EA0488: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F60B41: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8F6144A: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x8E9DB67: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3.0.0)
- ==1436== by 0x400F315: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:85)
- ==1436== by 0x400F3EE: _dl_init (dl-init.c:52)
- ==1436== by 0x40016F9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so)
- ==1436==
- ==1436== LEAK SUMMARY:
- ==1436== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==1436== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==1436== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==1436== still reachable: 3,793 bytes in 15 blocks
- ==1436== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==1436==
- ==1436== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
- ==1436== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)
- Illegal instruction (core dumped)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement