Advertisement
Guest User

Debate citations

a guest
Feb 2nd, 2012
240
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.39 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [1] By Thomas P Sullivan(Partner at Jenner and Block LLP and chair of the Capital Punishment Reform Study Committee and former U.S. attorney for North district of Illinois) “Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Everybody Wins” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Spring 2005 Northwestern University School of Law
  2.  
  3. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6700/is_3_95/ai_n29204195/?tag=mantle_skin;content
  4.  
  5.  
  6.  
  7. [2] Department of Homeland Security, "Budget in Brief", wrote on 2011, accessed November 29, 2011, http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/budget-bib-fy2012.pdf
  8.  
  9. "The FY 2012 budget request for DHS is $57.0 billion in total funding, $47.4 billion in gross discretionary funding, and $43.2 billion in net discretionary funding."
  10.  
  11. [3]Department of Justice, "FY 2012 Budget Request", wrote on February 14, 2011, accessed November 29, 2011, http://www.justice.gov/about/budget-rollout-presentation.pdf
  12.  
  13. Total DOJ Discretionary Budget $27,700 [In millions of dollars]
  14.  
  15. [4] By Thomas P Sullivan(Partner at Jenner and Block LLP and chair of the Capital Punishment Reform Study Committee and former U.S. attorney for North district of Illinois) “Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Everybody Wins” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Spring 2005 Northwestern University School of Law
  16.  
  17. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6700/is_3_95/ai_n29204195/?tag=mantle_skin;content
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. [5] Richard J. Ofshe (University of California, Berkeley - Department of Sociology) and Richard A. Leo (University of San Francisco - School of Law), "The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrogation", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, wrote on 1998, (88), accessed December 15, 2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1133224 (Giovanni S)
  22.  
  23. [6] The Justice Project(a non-profit, non-partisan organization working to increase fairness and accuracy in the criminal justice system.) and Pew Charitable Trusts(studies and promotes nonpartisan solutions for pressing and emerging problems affecting the American public and the global community.) “Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: A Policy Review” 2007
  24.  
  25. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Death_penalty_reform/Recording%20of%20interrogations%20policy%20brief.pdf
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29. [7] The Justice Project (a non-profit, non-partisan organization working to increase fairness and accuracy in the criminal justice system.) and Pew Charitable Trusts (studies and promotes nonpartisan solutions for pressing and emerging problems affecting the American public and the global community.) “Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: A Policy Review” 2007
  30.  
  31. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Death_penalty_reform/Recording%20of%20interrogations%20policy%20brief.pdf
  32.  
  33. [8] Supreme Court Special Committee (Joseph J. Barraco, Esq.,( Assistant Director for Criminal Practice, New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts) Jeffrey A. Newman, (Deputy Clerk, Appellate Division Administrative Services) Vance D. Hagins, (Assistant Chief, Criminal Practice Division, New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts )), "Report of the supreme court special committee on recordation of custodial interrogations", wrote on April 15, 2005, http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/notices/reports/cookreport.pdf
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement