Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 14th, 2014
191
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 15.71 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. Session Start: Sun Jul 13 20:39:55 2014
  3. Session Ident: #kspcupparley
  4. 03[20:39] * Now talking in #kspcupparley
  5. 03[20:39] * portlane.esper.net sets mode: +nt
  6. 03[20:39] * r4m0n (~r4m0n@portal.mumech.com) has joined #kspcupparley
  7. 03[20:40] * ferram4 (webchat@user-160ugam.cable.mindspring.com) has joined #kspcupparley
  8. [20:42] <r4m0n> might be good to make this channel secret (I think it's +s)
  9. [20:42] <r4m0n> just in case someone looks at our infos
  10. [20:44] <ferram4> Is ominousroom secret?
  11. [20:44] <r4m0n> nope, I left it out to taunt people XD
  12. 03[20:44] * NathanKell sets mode: +o r4m0n
  13. 03[20:44] * NathanKell sets mode: +o ferram4
  14. 03[20:44] * r4m0n sets mode: +s
  15. 01[21:55] <@NathanKell> for the record no reply on either medium
  16. 01[21:55] <@NathanKell> Probably just not on right now.
  17. [21:56] <@r4m0n> yeah, nothing from Rows on the results too, weekends are trouble
  18. 03[21:58] * metaphor (webchat@24-158-114-93.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com) has joined #kspcupparley
  19. [21:58] <metaphor> hello
  20. [21:58] <@r4m0n> oh, hello there :-)
  21. [21:59] <metaphor> so did you guys win the last forum challenge?
  22. [21:59] <@r4m0n> seems so, Rowsdower informed me by PM. did he get in contact with you guys?
  23. 12[21:59] <metaphor> i just got nathankell's message
  24. [21:59] <metaphor> congrats!
  25. [22:00] <metaphor> yeah Rowsdower contacted our team too
  26. 01[22:00] <@NathanKell> Congrats!
  27. 01[22:00] <@NathanKell> Like I said, had no idea you were on that team. This is awesome (and terrifying)
  28. [22:00] <metaphor> the other reddit teams dropped out so we kinda won by default
  29. [22:00] <@r4m0n> your entry for the 3rd contest was pretty good, I'd be pretty worried if we had to go against it
  30. 01[22:01] <@NathanKell> ^^^^
  31. 03[22:01] * r4m0n sets mode: +o metaphor
  32. [22:01] <@metaphor> thanks
  33. [22:02] <@metaphor> did you send a message to my other teammates or should i inform them to come here?
  34. [22:03] <@r4m0n> only you, if you could invite them, that would be great
  35. 01[22:03] <@NathanKell> You're the only one any of us 'knew' :)
  36. 01[22:03] <@NathanKell> But as I said in the PM, 'et al' :)
  37. [22:06] <@metaphor> we usually communicate by email
  38. [22:06] <@metaphor> this is the second time i've ever used IRC
  39. [22:07] <@ferram4> It's certainly a lot more responsive than email.
  40. [22:07] <@ferram4> Even with everyone in other tabs all the time.
  41. 01[22:08] <@NathanKell> >.>
  42. 01[22:09] <@NathanKell> the #kspmodders channel is where a lot of the modders hang out, e.g.
  43. 01[22:11] <@NathanKell> So if the others are coming we should probably wait for them
  44. [22:11] <@r4m0n> yeah, metaphor, can you stick around until your teammates arive?
  45. [22:13] <@metaphor> yeah i can stay for a while
  46. 01[22:14] <@NathanKell> Cool!
  47. 01[22:15] <@NathanKell> Ooh, while I have you! I keep trying to find out from you exactly what orbital parameters in RSS are messed up, like you mentioned.
  48. 01[22:15] <@NathanKell> I'm happy to fix them, just dunno what.
  49. [22:22] <@metaphor> hmm i have to remember, i haven't actually played with RSS in a while
  50. [22:23] <@metaphor> i think it was just the mean anomalies
  51. [22:24] <@metaphor> the beginning of the game wasn't the right configuration of planets for jan 1, 1950
  52. 01[22:24] <@NathanKell> Weird, because egg took that from Naval Observatory data IIRC
  53. 01[22:24] <@NathanKell> So some sign got flipped maybe, or maybe I'm not converting it to KSP-eze right?
  54. [22:24] <@metaphor> maybe
  55. [22:25] <@metaphor> i couldn't tell exactly what was wrong
  56. 01[22:25] <@NathanKell> Ah. Dang.
  57. 01[22:25] <@NathanKell> Ok.
  58. [22:25] <@metaphor> and that was about a month or two ago so it might be fixed now if you've changed it at all
  59. 01[22:25] <@NathanKell> We haven't changed anything since fake-tilt was added
  60. 01[22:25] <@NathanKell> i.e. tilt the ecliptic.
  61. [22:26] <@metaphor> ah yeah i think that had something to do with it
  62. [22:27] <@metaphor> because before that the planets were actually in the right places at the right times
  63. 01[22:27] <@NathanKell> Thanks to git I can roll back to check. I'll take this up with egg when he gets back to a computer.
  64. 01[22:27] <@NathanKell> Thanks!
  65. [22:29] <@metaphor> i'm a little surprised no one else has checked the in-game planet positions with the real ones at the right times
  66. [22:32] <@metaphor> i noticed it when i was trying to get a mission to pluto and none of the real launch windows matched up
  67. 01[22:32] <@NathanKell> I think a lot of us just launch to the Earth-Moon system, and of the IP crowd it's mostly Mars.
  68. 01[22:33] <@NathanKell> Also, you probably overestimate the average KSP player's skillbase, especially since *they were asking you how to do that* on RSSreddit. :]
  69. 03[22:33] * chicknblender (webchat@172.242.44.194) has joined #kspcupparley
  70. [22:34] <chicknblender> evenin' gentlemen
  71. [22:34] <@ferram4> o/
  72. [22:34] <@metaphor> hey chicknblender
  73. 01[22:34] <@NathanKell> o/
  74. [22:37] <chicknblender> congrats, and thanks for all the mods
  75. [22:37] <chicknblender> so what did i miss?
  76. [22:37] <@r4m0n> nothing yet, we're waiting for your teammates
  77. 03[22:37] * r4m0n sets mode: +o chicknblender
  78. [22:38] <@metaphor> i'm not sure iclarion and stochasty are coming
  79. 01[22:38] <@NathanKell> Other than metaphor and me discussing RSS orbits
  80. 01[22:39] <@NathanKell> We haven't started parlayyyyying yet :]
  81. [22:39] <@r4m0n> well, if the others aren't likely to come, I guess we can get started
  82. [22:40] <@r4m0n> we've invited you guys here because our team didn't find Rowsdower (and Squad) choice for the last challenge very fair and fitting
  83. [22:41] <@chicknblender> I am not even sure what the challenge is, other than live streaming.
  84. [22:41] <@r4m0n> first we would like to hear what you guys think about it, namely, having a single person do something during a stream
  85. [22:41] <@metaphor> yeah we didn't get much info
  86. [22:41] <@ferram4> Neither did we, tbh.
  87. [22:41] <@chicknblender> My guess is that they want us to basically hawk 0.24 live online somehow.
  88. [22:41] <@r4m0n> we neither, but now the challenge has gone down from a group thing to a 1x1 match
  89. [22:41] <@r4m0n> I think it's possibly 0.24 related too
  90. [22:42] <@chicknblender> Yeah, our team has always benefited from f5/f9 and, you know, teamwork
  91. [22:42] <@chicknblender> BTW off subject but were y'all team 1 on the last challenge?
  92. [22:42] <@metaphor> multiplayer isn't in 0.24 right?
  93. [22:42] <@r4m0n> yep
  94. 01[22:43] <@NathanKell> to both
  95. [22:43] <@r4m0n> MP isn't going to be stock for a loooooong while, if ever
  96. [22:43] <@metaphor> if we did have multiplayer available that might be a good team challenge even with just one person streaming
  97. 01[22:43] <@NathanKell> Heh. Fitting if it got Resource'd.
  98. [22:43] <@metaphor> but i guess that's only possible with the mod
  99. [22:44] <@chicknblender> I get the impression that this thing is getting made up as we go along. Not that this bothers me too much. It's just a game at the end of the day.
  100. [22:45] <@metaphor> yeah, i think it was just something Rowsdower made up on the fly
  101. [22:45] <@metaphor> for PR purposes during the world cup
  102. [22:45] <@r4m0n> same feel here, which is why we think we may be able to come with an alternative
  103. [22:46] <@r4m0n> if we come up with something interesting for both parties, we may be able to get Rows to compromise
  104. [22:47] <@chicknblender> sounds good. last I checked the challenge wasn't even announced to the public.
  105. [22:47] <@r4m0n> nope, so far only we know anything about it
  106. [22:47] <@chicknblender> OTOH, I was kinda looking forward to letting iClarion do all the work while I sit on my ass :)
  107. [22:47] <@metaphor> as far as I know, the last challenge winner hasn't even been announced
  108. [22:48] <@r4m0n> looks like Rowsdower is waiting to make it public with the final date announcement too
  109. [22:50] <@chicknblender> Well I am willing to work with y'all on this. I have enjoyed participating so far, and there is a part of me that's a little sad at the prospect of not being able to do the last challenge (sucky internet connection). Do y'all have anything in mind yet?
  110. [22:52] <@ferram4> There's part of me that wants to do a Realism Overhaul challenge, going as many places as you can on a minimum amount of mass, but I don't know how that would really work out.
  111. [22:52] <@r4m0n> so far all I could think of was something involving more of the team, and maybe something with tight time constrains, so maybe it could be done during a stream or something
  112. [22:53] <@chicknblender> oh god you would kill me on RSS. :) metaphor might be better-prepared though
  113. [22:53] <@metaphor> seems to me like you might be biased with RO seeing as you have the person who created it
  114. [22:53] <@metaphor> haha
  115. [22:53] <@metaphor> it would be a fun challenge though
  116. 01[22:53] <@NathanKell> Metaphor, you know you're better at actually *flying* it than me. :]
  117. 01[22:54] <@NathanKell> That's why I said terrified, and why your missions are in the RSS OP. :)
  118. [22:54] <@ferram4> Indeed, but the problem is setting the limits on what engines, tanks and everything you can have.
  119. [22:54] <@r4m0n> we could try thinking about something we are all bad at XD
  120. [22:54] <@metaphor> chicknblender is better than me at making minimum-mass spacecraft
  121. [22:54] <@chicknblender> I am bad at Whackjob crafts. I know that for sure now.
  122. [22:55] <@r4m0n> that rocket was a catastrophe
  123. [22:55] <@ferram4> Hey, I'm suggesting a minimum-mass challenge in RSS. If I wanted to be biased I would have suggested a max payload to orbit in RSS challenge.
  124. [22:55] <@metaphor> my idea to get everyone involved is just to use the darkmultiplayer mod and try to build something or go somewhere on stream
  125. 01[22:55] <@NathanKell> Ooh, or spaceplanes in RO
  126. [22:56] <@r4m0n> I was thinking about DMP too... it's crap to do anything with multiple people together, though
  127. [22:56] <@metaphor> but that might not work either seeing as not all of us can be online at the same time
  128. 01[22:57] <@NathanKell> Yeah, we have somewhat variant schedules too
  129. [22:57] <@chicknblender> I love what y'all do/have done, but I think we are going to run into some disagreement with Rowsdower/Squad if we try to base the last challenge off of a mod that overalls any major aspect of the game.
  130. 01[22:57] <@NathanKell> On the contrary, I think that could also be a selling point for the PR.
  131. [22:57] <@r4m0n> yeah, I have to agree with that
  132. 01[22:57] <@NathanKell> Well, maybe not RO.
  133. 01[22:58] <@NathanKell> But certainly some level of modding: "look at how open KSP is! Look at how we cater to creativity! And to your own special taste in playing!"
  134. [22:58] <@chicknblender> btw currently playing thru with dre, far, and others so it's not like I don't like your work. :)
  135. [22:59] <@metaphor> if one of the teams weren't completely composed of modders, i would even suggest making a simple mod as a challenge
  136. [22:59] <@metaphor> to showcase ksp's mod-making abilities
  137. [22:59] <@chicknblender> Hahaha that's the key to crushing defeat for our team but it would be amusing
  138. [22:59] <@r4m0n> what looks more obvious to me would be some challenge involving the new contracts, if Rows is ok with showcasing 0.24
  139. [23:00] <@chicknblender> yes, perhaps a minimal-cost mission of some sort. ain't no way anybody is any good at that yet. :)
  140. 01[23:01] <@NathanKell> I'd say basing things on contracts *themselves* would be a bit too random though, given what's been said about them.
  141. [23:02] <@chicknblender> maybe a speed run? although that just really shows off exploits.
  142. [23:02] <@r4m0n> a race to the most $$ in a certain amount of time would be reasonably easy to do. I'm not opposed to having a video of the missions else than directly streaming
  143. [23:03] <@ferram4> Hmm... I wonder whether it would be cheaper to use SRBs or to build an infiniglider...
  144. [23:03] <@r4m0n> do both :-)
  145. [23:04] <@chicknblender> If I was in your shoes, the existance of infinigliders would really piss me off
  146. [23:05] <@chicknblender> but we may be getting ahead of ourselves since we don't know for sure that 0.24 is available for the last mission yet
  147. 01[23:05] <@NathanKell> Yeah.
  148. 01[23:06] <@NathanKell> Honestly, I do kinda like the Mod idea--we could do something like have us be forced to make a mod in an area we don't have experience in?
  149. [23:06] <@r4m0n> we can try to get Rowsdower here (probably only tomorrow) if you want to try to talk this out
  150. [23:06] <@chicknblender> I think Rows really ought to go ahead and post results of the last challenge, even if the final challenge isn't ready yet. That thread is turning into a graveyard.
  151. [23:06] <@metaphor> from what i've heard 0.24 should be out pretty soon, maybe even only a couple of days
  152. [23:08] <@chicknblender> Thing is, if they want us to sell 0.24, they are kinda looking at the wrong folks. We will try to do something difficult which will probably confuse casual users and/or exploit issues that still need to be ironed out.
  153. [23:08] <@r4m0n> yeah, there is that
  154. 01[23:08] <@NathanKell> Exactly. Same with us probably.
  155. 01[23:09] <@NathanKell> Which is why I think the mods side is a neat angle; it lets us show off some of the *crazy* stuff you can do with KSP, without showing how their new update might or might not be broken
  156. [23:09] <@metaphor> this would be a lot easier to discuss if we actually knew anything about what Rowsdower wants to do
  157. [23:09] <@chicknblender> I would also like to know more about what the last challenge is, because maybe there *is* a way for teammates to contribute and we just don't know what it is yet. (Or maybe Rowsdower is just still thinking about it.)
  158. 12[23:09] <@ferram4> NathanKell: We'd have to play with a severe handicap though. And that's impossible to balance out.
  159. 01[23:10] <@NathanKell> I mean either playing with mods
  160. 01[23:10] <@NathanKell> I agree that making mods is..fraught.
  161. 01[23:10] <@NathanKell> either playing with mods or *perhaps* the "only get to make a mod in an area you know nothing about" but yeah, fraught.
  162. [23:10] <@chicknblender> Well, I mean, you all understand KSP in a much deeper way than players-only like myself. :)
  163. [23:11] <@chicknblender> There's nothing wrong with that
  164. [23:12] <@metaphor> what i was hoping for some time ago was that the last challenge would be to use asteroids in some way, since we haven't used them so far
  165. [23:12] <@chicknblender> I think it would be funny to take an off-the-wall mod that none of us have used, and force us to use that for the challenge. Something like a bizarre parts mod.
  166. [23:12] <@metaphor> that's a good idea
  167. [23:13] <@chicknblender> I do seem to recall some asteroids getting used in the first mission, but not quite like what you have in mind.
  168. [23:14] <@chicknblender> OK maybe step 1 from here should be getting Rowsdower in on the conversation.
  169. [23:15] <@metaphor> yes
  170. [23:16] <@r4m0n> yeah. he isn't around right now, but he probably will tomorrow
  171. [23:16] <@r4m0n> we can take the time to think of other possibilities
  172. [23:17] <@chicknblender> OK sounds good. I am still OK with the streaming thing *if* Rows can make it involve teammates somehow (even if that involvement happens before the stream).
  173. [23:18] <@chicknblender> I gotta get to bed, but nice chatting with you all.
  174. [23:18] <@r4m0n> cya, we'll be around here
  175. [23:18] <@metaphor> later
  176. [23:19] <@chicknblender> Lots of respect to all of you also. Y'all are superstars in the world of KSP.
  177. [23:19] <@chicknblender> goodnight
  178. 03[23:19] * @chicknblender (webchat@172.242.44.194) has left #kspcupparley
  179. 02[23:47] * @metaphor (webchat@24-158-114-93.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com) Quit (Ping timeout: 190 seconds)
  180. Session Time: Mon Jul 14 00:00:00 2014
  181. 03[03:17] * Majiir (~Majiir@pool-64-222-106-180.burl.east.myfairpoint.net) has joined #kspcupparley
  182. [03:17] <Majiir> What in hell
  183. 03[03:17] * r4m0n sets mode: +o Majiir
  184. [03:17] <@Majiir> Why is this better :|
  185. [03:18] <@r4m0n> this is our meeting room with the Reddit team
  186. [03:18] <@Majiir> Ahh
  187. [03:18] <@Majiir> A meeting on the high seas of IRC
  188. 12[03:18] <@r4m0n> NathanKell will get you a dump
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement