comment_char %
escape_char /

% Esperanto language locale for ... %CHANGEME
% Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo at rano dot org> %CHANGEME

LC_IDENTIFICATION
title      "Lojban locale"
source     ""
address    ""
contact    ""
email      "[email protected]" %CHANGEME
tel        ""
fax        ""
language   "lojban"
territory  ""
revision   "draft"
date       "2013-07-08"
%
category  "jbo:2000";LC_IDENTIFICATION
category  "jbo:2000";LC_CTYPE
category  "jbo:2000";LC_COLLATE
category  "jbo:2000";LC_TIME
category  "jbo:2000";LC_NUMERIC
category  "jbo:2000";LC_MONETARY
category  "jbo:2000";LC_MESSAGES
category  "jbo:2000";LC_PAPER
category  "jbo:2000";LC_NAME
category  "jbo:2000";LC_ADDRESS
category  "jbo:2000";LC_TELEPHONE

END LC_IDENTIFICATION

LC_CTYPE
copy "i18n"
END LC_CTYPE

% Lojban, intentionally, follows English alphabetical sorting.
LC_COLLATE
copy "iso14651_t1"
END LC_COLLATE

%% Now unfortunately, nothing I do will convince it to spit out
%% lojban in the place of number symbols. The only thing I can
%% changer are: currency symbol, decimal point, thousands sep,
%% digit grouping, and positive/negative symbols. Would it be
%% best to represent these symbolically, or through lojban words?

LC_MONETARY %CHANGEME--
int_curr_symbol         "<U0045><U0055><U0052><U0020>" % "EUR"
currency_symbol         "<U0045><U0055><U0052><U0020>" % "EUR"
% "<U20AC>" ne eblas en ISO-8859-3
mon_decimal_point       "<U002C>"
mon_thousands_sep       "<U0020>"
mon_grouping            3;3
positive_sign           ""
negative_sign           "<U002D>"
int_frac_digits         2
frac_digits             2
p_cs_precedes           1
p_sep_by_space          1
n_cs_precedes           1
n_sep_by_space          1
p_sign_posn             1
n_sign_posn             1
END LC_MONETARY %--CHANGEME

LC_NUMERIC
decimal_point           "<U002C>"
thousands_sep           ""
grouping                0;0
END LC_NUMERIC

LC_TIME

%% So, there's two paths we can go here. 'Monday' can be {lurdei} (moon-day)
%% or, it can be {pavdei} (one-day). To be more correct with the name it's representing,
%% the planetary names should be used. However numeric would overall sound better.
%% Also I have no idea what to do for 3-letter abbreviations. Suggestions?
%% As for date/time, as long as it has to remain numeric, I suggest ISO8601
%% inheritance. Just because it's cool.

%CHANGEME--
% "dim";"lun";"mar";"mer";"ĵaŭ";"ven";"sab"
abday	"<U0064><U0069><U006D>";"<U006C><U0075><U006E>";/
	"<U006D><U0061><U0072>";"<U006D><U0065><U0072>";/
	"<U0135><U0061><U016D>";"<U0076><U0065><U006E>";/
	"<U0073><U0061><U0062>"

% "dimanĉo";"lundo";"mardo";"merkredo";"ĵaŭdo";"vendredo";"sabato"
day	"<U0064><U0069><U006D><U0061><U006E><U0109><U006F>";/
	"<U006C><U0075><U006E><U0064><U006F>";/
	"<U006D><U0061><U0072><U0064><U006F>";/
	"<U006D><U0065><U0072><U006B><U0072><U0065><U0064><U006F>";/
	"<U0135><U0061><U016D><U0064><U006F>";/
	"<U0076><U0065><U006E><U0064><U0072><U0065><U0064><U006F>";/
	"<U0073><U0061><U0062><U0061><U0074><U006F>"

% "Jan";"Feb";"Mar";"Apr";"Maj";"Jun";"Jul";"Aŭg";"Sep";"Okt";"Nov";"Dec"
abmon	"<U004A><U0061><U006E>";"<U0046><U0065><U0062>";/
	"<U004D><U0061><U0072>";"<U0041><U0070><U0072>";/
	"<U004D><U0061><U006A>";"<U004A><U0075><U006E>";/
	"<U004A><U0075><U006C>";"<U0041><U016D><U0067>";/
	"<U0053><U0065><U0070>";"<U004F><U006B><U0074>";/
	"<U004E><U006F><U0076>";"<U0044><U0065><U0063>"

% "Januaro";"Februaro";"Marto";"Aprilo";"Majo";"Junio";
% "Julio";"Aŭgusto";"Septembro";"Oktobro";"Novembro";"Decembro"
mon	"<U004A><U0061><U006E><U0075><U0061><U0072><U006F>";/
	"<U0046><U0065><U0062><U0072><U0075><U0061><U0072><U006F>";/
	"<U004D><U0061><U0072><U0074><U006F>";/
	"<U0041><U0070><U0072><U0069><U006C><U006F>";/
	"<U004D><U0061><U006A><U006F>";/
	"<U004A><U0075><U006E><U0069><U006F>";/
	"<U004A><U0075><U006C><U0069><U006F>";/
	"<U0041><U016D><U0067><U0075><U0073><U0074><U006F>";/
	"<U0053><U0065><U0070><U0074><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U006F>";/
	"<U004F><U006B><U0074><U006F><U0062><U0072><U006F>";/
	"<U004E><U006F><U0076><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U006F>";/
	"<U0044><U0065><U0063><U0065><U006D><U0062><U0072><U006F>"

am_pm	"";""

%--CHANGEME
% "%a %d %b %Y %T %z"
d_t_fmt	"<U0025><U0061><U0020><U0025><U0064><U0020><U0025><U0062><U0020><U0025><U0059><U0020><U0025><U0054><U0020><U0025><U007A>"

% "%Y-%m-%d"
d_fmt	"<U0025><U0059><U002D><U0025><U006D><U002D><U0025><U0064>"

% "%T"
t_fmt	"<U0025><U0054>"

t_fmt_ampm ""

% date_fmt ?

END LC_TIME

LC_MESSAGES
% "^[JjYy].*"
yesexpr	"<U005E><U005B><U004A><U006A><U0059><U0079><U005D><U002E><U002A>"
% "^[Nn].*"
noexpr	"<U005E><U005B><U006E><U004E><U005D><U002E><U002A>"
END LC_MESSAGES

%% Couldn't say.
LC_PAPER
height	297
width	210
END LC_PAPER

%% Possibly use +##########? There's probably a more ideal lojbanic way though.
LC_TELEPHONE
% "+%c %a %l"
tel_int_fmt	"<U002B><U0025><U0063><U0020><U0025><U0061><U0020>/
<U0025><U006C>"
% "00"
int_select	"<U0030><U0030>"
END LC_TELEPHONE

LC_MEASUREMENT
measurement    1
END LC_MEASUREMENT


%% Should we precede with {la}?
LC_NAME
% "%d%t%g%t%m%t%f"
name_fmt    "<U0025><U0064><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0067><U0025><U0074>/
<U0025><U006D><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066>"
name_mr     "<U0073><U002D><U0072><U006F>"              % "s-ro"
name_mrs    "<U0073><U002D><U0069><U006E><U006F>"       % "s-ino"
name_ms     "<U0073><U002D><U0069><U006E><U006F>"       % "s-ino"
END LC_NAME

%% Here I would suggest using ordinary postal addresses.

LC_ADDRESS
% "%f%N%a%N%d%N%b%N%s %h %e %r%N%%z %T%N%c%N"
postal_fmt    "<U0025><U0066><U0025><U004E><U0025><U0061><U0025><U004E>/
<U0025><U0064><U0025><U004E><U0025><U0062><U0025><U004E><U0025><U0073>/
<U0020><U0025><U0068><U0020><U0025><U0065><U0020><U0025><U0072><U0025>/
<U004E><U0025><U0025><U007A><U0020><U0025><U0054><U0025>/
<U004E><U0025><U0063><U0025><U004E>"
% "Esperanto"
lang_name     "<U0045><U0073><U0070><U0065><U0072><U0061><U006E><U0074><U006F>"
lang_ab       "<U0065><U006F>" % "eo"
lang_term     "<U0065><U0070><U006F>" % "epo"
END LC_ADDRESS