Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Nov 17th, 2010
322
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.73 KB | None | 0 0
  1. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda
  2. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  3. e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/sda
  4. Could this be a zero-length partition?
  5. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda1
  6. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  7. e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/sda1
  8. Could this be a zero-length partition?
  9. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda2
  10. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  11. e2fsck: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sda2
  12.  
  13. The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
  14. filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
  15. filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
  16. is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
  17. e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
  18.  
  19. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda3
  20. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  21. e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/sda3
  22. Could this be a zero-length partition?
  23. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda4
  24. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  25. e2fsck: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/sda4
  26.  
  27. The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
  28. filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
  29. filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
  30. is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
  31. e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
  32.  
  33. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo e2fsck -c /dev/sda5
  34. e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
  35. e2fsck: Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read while trying to open /dev/sda5
  36. Could this be a zero-length partition?
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement