Richard Millet France - Literary praise of Anders Breivik

Richard Millet France - Literary praise of Anders Behring Breivik

Google Translation into English from Richard Millet - Original title: Éloge littéraire d'Anders Breivik

(Francais: http://pastebin.com/PjpJqjc5)

Richard Millet - Praise literary Anders Breivik

Suicide? No need, life and death are the same thing. My view of the eternal where I am now, where I have been, I always will be.' (Pierre Drieu La Rochelle, Le Feu follet.)

In undertaking this could be a literary praise of Anders Behring Breivik that I would care one mind that I do not approve of the acts Breivik, July 22, 2011, in Norway. C, however, is that these acts I will discuss, struck by their formal perfection, therefore, in a certain way, and if indeed they can be detached from their political or criminal, by their literary dimension, perfection as evil, always more or less to do with literature.

Stories (or at least what the press called once again the "new" and that submission to the order language which abrades the globalist language shortening words, or by revising and replacing it renamed the "news "), the stories are fast setting and forgetting proportion, since we, Europeans, are out of the story to live not in the post-historical but where an outside non-story took mask nihilistic entertainment, as is now the worst of insignificance literary, artistic, intellectual and political Europe, and it becomes even cruising speed of the entire West, it is necessary to recall that what happened July 22, 2411: Anders Breivik, a Norwegian thirty-two years, first made a bomb in central Oslo, at 3:26 p.m. in front of the building which includes the seat of government and the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, or the central government of Norway today. The explosion killed eight people will.

An hour later, disguised as a police officer, Breivik embarked on the ferry leading to the small island of Utoya, very close to Oslo, where he kills Sixty-nine people, mostly young Labourites gathered there to a university summer, which, with the eight victims of Oslo, a total of seventy-seven dead, and (many wounded. Breivik be stopped without having exchanged a single shot with the security forces, received on the island an hour later only. I
the recently described as "paranoid schizophrenic irresponsible" by psychiatrists - "experts", of course, that is to say, people primarily responsible for the IC system the illusion of knowledge "specialized", which participates in the big lie media expert walking hand in hand with the lawyer, journalist and novelist postlittéraire, each other and serving the political order.

The "madness" of Breivik, if it is recognized by new experts will be a way to silence a man who wants of sound mind and responsible. Such a trial, where Breivik outlines his ideas about the Islamization of Europe, is obviously difficult for the Norwegian democracy, yet loving openness, tolerance and brotherhood among peoples irenic, like all European nations, however, worried a non-European immigration, mostly Muslim, which maintains a victimist intimidation or fear everyday, so a ferment of civil war, at the same time as the oxymoronic illusion of a "moderate Islam."

This muting, Breivik had probably feared, who, before taking action, took care to spread on the Internet a "Compendium" 1500 pages: a manifesto whose naivety, the composite , culture "Wikipedia" are not difficult to point out and make indigestible, though not devoid of interest, in places, but that this manifesto can not be reduced to a violent rejection of multiculturalism, including its iron Lance: Islam. Breivik questions the ethno-racial recomposition of a loss of influence in Europe and international economic and financial efficiency, although Norway is an exception, with what vocabulary journalist called windfall, using without the knowledge of the biblical vocabulary or caught by the Christian dimension of language, while European nations, if declared obsolete, at least old (with pejorative now attached to this epithet is decreed that old does not consent to the bliss of the immediacy), these nations disintegrate socially along with their Christian essence is lost in favor of general relativism and multiculturalism.

Breivik's speech, say the "experts" is no different from that of one European extreme right. It embodies the same doxa and Breivik is the paragon of "fascist" past terrorist action, having "freaked out" for the greatest happiness of the society of the Spectacle, that is to say the West socialist (or humanitarianism, globalist, anti-racist, etc.) that finally here is what that condemn the speech of extreme right left as fear, though he terrorizes fools: this great fear that the "do-gooders" maintained so long as they maintained the fiction Marxist blades radiant.

Things are not so simple. Breivik is, first and foremost, an exemplary product of Western decadence that has taken the apparrence the petty bourgeois Americanized: children of divorce, like a son ideal, it is not piercing, tattoos, dreadlocks, hair ras, or those ridiculous clothes are an ethnic attributes of multicultural youth with a decaying language, a blissful ignorance and sloppiness of some person.

He is heterosexual, he enjoys snowboarding, Budweiser, perfumes Chanel, Lacoste shirts (brand, Spectacular requires, immediately protested against the photos that Breivik, arrested, bears, with a strange smile, polo equipped with the horrible little crocodile, which is a symbol of contemporary infantilism). He read Hobbes's Leviathan, Burke's book on the French Revolution, and 1944, it is surprising not to see mention the Society of the Spectacle Flange or some books Baudrillard.
In good child lost, s is sought membership expanded: the Progress Party (obviously called populist and xenophobic "by the press), Freemasonry, the Knights Templar of Europe, both past affiliations representative for the first one of the many excesses of democracy yet loving transparency, and the other kitsch in the fight against multiculturalism.

We can therefore say that Breivik is a child of the family as well as ruin the racial divide ideologised-European immigration from outside Europe introduced in the last twenty years, and whose advent had been prepared long ago by sub-American mass culture, the ultimate consequence of the Marshall Plan: the Marshall Plan to the omnipotence of a globalized market, we can follow the movement by which Europe is déshistoricisée economic, cultural, and without ethnic doubt. I'm not trying to make the socio-political psychology, I am not an "expert", and not close to Breivik which, I repeat, I condemn the acts, I find that the drift is in Breivik great loss of innocence and hope that characterizes the West, and who are the other names of the ruin of the value and meaning.

Breivik, like many other individuals, young or not, a copy of a population to which the constant devaluation of the idea of ​​nation, stigmatize the love of his country, or the criminalization of patriotism, open an abyss qu'accroît identity as living end of civilization which we laughed not imagine any other continent can embody in the miracle, as the new masters of the world, Doha Rio, Hong Kong and Bombay, and Sydney to Singapore, can only provide the technological version, that is to say, the conversion of the individual petty bourgeois mixed, globalized, uneducated, Social Democrat - is the kind of people that Breivik killed and yet it is something other than what Enzensberger calls a "radical loser" because he acted alone, and not in accordance with a program terrorist acts being its best manifestation derisory survival instinct civilization.

This press did not want to of course consider: Breivik lacks this quality would eventually reverse reassure noble souls by awakening the great fantasy of a right-wing neo-Nazi, which begins in Germany, for example a villainous character (which led Chancellor Merkel to apologize to foreign residents, mostly Turks, installed on German soil, the "apology" is a sacrificial ceremonial jokes by which Europe not finish anything to lose, with the Oslo police also apologized for it not be reached rather quickly): Breivik is not racist, they are not immigrants he has killed, but young ethnic Norwegians working according him (and there is indeed the heart of the matter), the denaturation of the Norwegian nation.

Breivik is a lone warrior: child abandoned by his father, he became a soldier lost a war that dare not speak its name. The thing is not negligible. S why his compendium that reveals, hollow, sinking of the individual, its almost damnation contains relevant analysis of the loss of national identity. Breivik reminds us, in a way that the signature dessert thinking (or even abolished), a civil war is underway in Europe.

But what distance, for example, suicide, no less spectacular, as opposed Mlishima decadence of modern Japan! So Breivik is it a symptom of decadence more than revealing sense - the sense of history that Europe is in the process of abstracting. And the recent political Islamization of the Maghreb, Egypt, and soon the entire Middle East has reminded us, after that irenic "experts" or geopolitical hacks fascinated by the Salafist revolt, Libya and Syria, had predicted the revival of the democratic and secular nations, while forgetting the power of voluntary servitude as well as discredit the democratic ideal that continues to throw itself in a Europe that has renounced its claim Christian roots.

I come massacre itself. It was noted that Europe is not left to America to mass murder? 11 is remarkable that they almost exclusively occur in the countries of Northern Europe, the Protestant countries, or who were also socially and politically copies. I remember some of these massacres. On 13 March 1996, sixteen died in Dunblane, England, on 2 September 7, 2001: five dead in the cantonal parliament of Zug, Switzerland, 26 March 2002, eight deaths mayor of Nanterre, France, March 27, 2002 : seventeen died in a kindergarten in Germany November 7, 2007, ten dead in a college Finland November 11, 2009, sixteen died in a German college. In each case, the killer turned the gun against him, as saith the understatement.

Breivik, it is made, what makes her act anything but a suicide somehow accompanied by: a political act that attempts to reduce access to lethal schizophrenia. A filmmaker will he his elephant? The Columbine massacre was a kind of literary event too, a tragic parable of boredom and emptiness that American film Gus Van Sant has managed to exemplary.

In the case of Breivik, it would be a bad action movie, which should also revise the end, because of its political nature - the return of calm is not enough morally "spectacular", seems to suggest that due coverage Nouvel Observateur that shows this summer, Breivik calmly adjusting his weapon during a reconstruction of this coverage is eerily similar to the best-selling Millennium, it is sufficient to replace his head with that of Johnny Depp to enter into insignificance spectacular and effacier act.

It is worth noting the á almost at the same time, Le Monde hurrying in a charming fishing village in Brazil a special envoy to paint on a full-page photo in the ballot box, the portrait of the terrorist Italian Cesare Battisti, converted into a writer "French", supported by the left and caviar spread its moods, is autoamnistiant with as much complacency as the reporter put the question, enjoying the extreme left in Europe, including in France, the more socialist European countries a favor and indulgence that pose a problem of conscience to anyone but also explain the act of Breivik - including his willingness to fight against the "marxisation" Europe: terminology somewhat ridiculous, Marxism before long been culturally digested by capitalism - the culture, or rather what has replaced it: the cultural left is symbolically, ideologically dominant and more insignificant, although it relies on the Right, another pillar, with the market the New World Order.
One might be tempted to see in Breivik a hero Malthusian doubled practitioner of mass murder.

It would distort his actions. They inserrivent a terribly dark background it is important to remember. That summer, which saw the Fukushima nuclear disaster and political ridiculed internationally by the DSK affair, socialist-terrorist priapic during the non dialectical erotomaniac Christian Democratic Berlusconi, and then the day after Utoya massacre, the death of Amy Winehouse, which has somehow stolen the limelight from Breivik, that summer, therefore, is especially paroxysmal time of a financial crisis that originated in 2008 and is currently to Europe to its knees.

Financial crisis that also marks the collapse of a civilization, only fools do not want to see. Breivik is certainly a sign hopeless and despairing, the underestimation of Europe from the ravages of multiculturalism as it indicates the defeat of the spiritual benefit of the money. The financial crisis is the meaning, value, and therefore the literature. Breivik, a naive way, far from embodying the Nial, s is done through the sacrificial evil that plagues our societies fallen into a horizontal leaderless and misleading.

Breivik says a survivor of the massacre, humming among the dead. Far from being a conceptual artist, as could believe this testimony, Breivik does not agree with what Baudrillard calls the "duplicity" of contemporary art, that is to say, the fact that "the claim invalidity, insignificance, nonsense, when we are already zero "- which cancels any proposal made artistic and existential. He has not sought to transform an act altogether insignificant in terms of inefficient policy a "fatal strategy" of the image.

It is not the anti-Warhol multiculturalism he did not want his shabby quarter of an hour of media glory, he is a writer by default, and probably exaggerated the incarnation of the hero's desperate Joachim Trier film, Oslo August 31st, which was released, and it is remarkable, a few months after the massacre of Utoya, a hero who takes the character of Wisp Louis Malle, based on the novel of Drieu La Rochelle - is rare in French journalists have noted, Drieu remains one of the greatest curse of French literature, although he paid his mistakes suicide.

Not that Breivik had made the simplest Surrealist act consists, according to Breton, "revolver with his fists down on the street and take the chance, as we can in the crowd" has not taken more Koran literally, about what inspires desire to exterminate all the wise man is to be found in the street. Two statements, one of Breton and the Koran, which has not been sufficiently noticed they come in relation to the background of wars and genocides of the twentieth century, with the echo of Adorno's condemnation of culture "after Auschwitz."

The extermination as a literary motif: that the unjustifiable, and that the question asked indirectly (and perhaps unintentionally) by Breivik to global overpopulation and ecological disaster, redoubles those of European birth rates and the breakdown of homogeneity companies like Norway, the Finnish, Swedish, the Danish, the Dutch, all those countries or modestly called populist governments entered.

Which we measure every day ignorance of the natives as the abyss that separates us from non-European populations noted installed on the ground, we know that it is above all the language in the price, and with it the memory blood, identity. Give us much reason to Breivik, under the pretext that his victims were as young Labour, so future employees multicultural nihilism? No, in the perfection of writing an assault rifle, it goes something that leads beyond justifiable - what could be, however, one of the definitions, restricted, literature, together with the negation thereof.

Number, multiculturalism, horizontality, dizzy with fatigue or loss of meaning, or what Renaud Camus called "décivilisation" with "great alternative" which is the corollary: that although the defeat literature. And it is remarkable that, beyond considerations on the extreme right of nebulae which we know also not quite what it is, if not a fantasy world socialism, the Nouvel Observateur journalist has noted, summer 2011, the famous authors of thrillers Scandinavian had not "planned" Breivik them yet so quick to denounce the alleged conspiracies neo-Nazis or archaeological threatening these companies well known that gnaws into reality. Maybe they explain Breivik.

These writers, of course, left the vigilant, these naive not usually see what they want to see, the Davidsen, the Nesbo, Mankell and the late author of Millennium are blind or dying eyes, when they not give in propaganda, as in Dead Ringers, Kjell Ola Dahl of Norway, Oslo which is presented as multicultural capital with its extra-European immigrants and its colorful neighborhoods, so dear to the French Bobos. - we see eg Commissioner of Police, Norway strain, take the name of Mustafa to marry a Muslim immigrant, and one of his colleagues to walk marveling at the district Grobarlandslein "Lena liked to blend into the crowd that swarmed between buildings colorful, with input from foreign architecture, as in Akerbergersvein minaret. Only missing the call to prayer of the muezzin to complete the exotic touch. "

Soothing vision of an "exotic" home, behind which refuses to consider that the muezzin's song sound the death of Christianity, so the end of our nations. In this decadence, Breivik is likely that Norway deserved and what awaits our companies continue to be blind to deny better, especially France and England, far from being an avenging angel or a beast of the Apocalypse, it is both executioner and victim, symptoms and possible cure. It is impossible even, whose negativity was unleashed s in the spiritual sky of Europe.

Another Norwegian writer Gunnar Staalesen more subtle, he Ironically, most importantly, more writer perhaps as old philologist, titled one of his novels, the hero is disenchanted titi Detective: At night all wolves are gray .
Breivik is tin these Disenchants become a lone wolf and gray. Breivik something gray. This is why it could be a writer. The Nouvel Observateur journalist, having found the blindness of his contemporaries believed Breivik find the origin of the great Knut Hamsun, was known to openly Nazi and ended his days in an asylum, as Breivik will end.