Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- United States SIGINT System
- January 2007 Strategic Mission List
- Introduction – Director’s Intent
- (S//SI) The SIGINT Strategic Mission List represents the intent of the Director, National Security Agency
- In regard to mission priorities and risks for the United States SIGINT System (USSS) over the next 12-18
- months. The list is derived from review of the Intelligence Community National Intelligence Priorities
- Framework, DCI/DNI Guidance, the Strategic Warning List, National SIGINT Requirements Process
- (NSRP) and other strategic planning documents. The missions included on the list are in relative priority
- order and represent the most urgent tasks for the USSS. The list is not intended to be all encompassing, but
- is intended to set forth guidance on the highest priorities.
- Topical Missions and Enduring Targets
- (S//SI) The SIGINT Strategic Mission List is divided into two parts. It includes 16 critical topical missions
- in Part I of the list, which represent missions discerned to be areas of highest priority for the USSS, where
- SIGINT can make key contributions. In addition to the 16 critical topical missions, Part II of the SIGINT
- Strategic Mission List includes 6 enduring targets that are included due to the need to work these targets
- Holistically because of their strategic importance. In addition to their long-term strategic importance, the
- enduring targets can potentially “trump” the highest priority topical missions on the list at any time, based
- upon evolving world events. Elements of these targets are also represented throughout the topical target
- sets. For each of the I6 topical missions and each of the 6 enduring targets the Strategic Mission List
- includes:
- 1) Focus Areas — critically important targets against which the SIGINT enterprise is placing emphasis.
- DIRNSA designation of a target as a focus area constitutes his guidance to the SIGINT System that it is a
- “must do" target for that mission
- 2) Accepted Risks — strategically significant targets against which the USSS is not placing emphasis and
- for which SIGINT should not be relied upon as a primary source. DIRNSA’s reasons for accepting these
- risks include high difficulty and lack of resources or as an “Economy of Force Measure,” in order to
- achieve focus on the most critical targets.
- A Strategic Investment Tool for SIGINT Resources
- (S//SI) Given a finite level of resources available in all mission areas, the Strategic Mission List provides
- high-level strategic direction to the global SIGINT system to focus resources on the most important/highest
- priority areas. “Risks” identify targets that cannot be resourced to the level of a Focus Area, thereby
- acknowledging that shortfalls will exist. As world circumstances change, these or other targets can be
- added to the list as needed; targets no longer of critical importance can also be removed from the Focus
- Area category. In addition, other targets, not listed as focus or risk areas, can also be worked by the USSS
- to a lesser degree to meet other customer requirements. The Strategic Mission List will be reviewed bi- annually by the USSS Signals Intelligence Leadership Team. Missions, Focus areas, and Accepted Risks
- will be adjusted as a means of providing high-level steerage to the Nation's agile SIGINT System.
- Derived From: NSA/CSSM l-52
- Dated: 20041123
- Declassify On: 20291123
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- (S//SI) Changes to Strategic Mission List - Note: Neither the number of missions nor focus areas are
- fixed
- l. Additions to the list or changes in text are highlighted in bold text for easy identification. These
- changes are carried as bold for one cycle of the list and then changed to normal text.
- 2. Deletions from the list are highlighted in bold double parentheses (( )) for easy identification
- These changes are carried for one cycle of the list and then removed
- 3. The SIGINT Leadership Team will revise the Mission List, ad hoc, when required.
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- United States SIGINT System Strategic Mission List - January 2007
- (U) I. Strategic Mission List - Topical Missions
- (S//SI) A. MISSION: Terrorism: Winning the Global War on Terrorism.
- Focus Areas: a. All Interagency Intelligence Committee on Terrorism (IICT) Tier 0 and 1 terrorist groups with
- capabilities and intentions to attack the US, its interests or allies, or groups actively planning or carrying out a terrorist attack against U.S. persons, facilities, or interests.
- b. Key individuals and Terrorist Support Entities (TSE) involved in the facilitation, financing, and
- recruitment or radicalization of all IICT Tier 0 and 1 terrorist group networks globally.
- Accepted Risks: All IICT Tier 2, 3, and 4 terrorist groups, and TSEs.
- (S//SI) B. MISSION: Homeland Security: Protecting the U.S. Homeland from terrorist attack and
- other transnational threats to safeguard U.S. persons, freedoms, critical information, infrastructure,
- property and economy.
- Focus Areas: a. Border Security (land, air, sea).
- b. Direct defense against terrorist attack.
- c. Diseases, epidemics, and pandemics.
- d. Executive Protection/U.S.-Based NSSEs e. Illicit Facilitation as it relates to special interest aliens and CBRN materials and technology.
- Accepted Risks: a. Accepted risks as stated in the “Terrorism” mission.
- b. Global coverage of all illicit activities of potential concern to the Homeland.
- (S//SI//REL USA, AUS, CAN, GBR) C. MISSION: WMD and CBRN Programs and Proliferation
- Combating the Threat of Development and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, CBRN,
- and Delivery Methods (particularly ballistic and nuclear-capable cruise missiles).
- Focus Areas:
- a. Development, Acquisition, or Use of CBRN.
- b. State WMD and ballistic and cruise missile programs of:
- China (biological, chemical, nuclear, ballistic and cruise missiles)
- India (nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- Iran (biological, chemical, nuclear, and ballistic missiles)
- North Korea (biological, chemical, nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- Pakistan (nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- Russia (biological, chemical, nuclear, ballistic and cruise missiles)
- Syria (chemical, nuclear, ballistic missiles).
- c. WMD and missile proliferation activities by states:
- China (nuclear, ballistic missiles), Israel (cruise missiles)
- North Korea (nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- Pakistan (nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- Russia (ballistic missile).
- d. WMD and missile acquisition activities by states:
- China (cruise missiles)
- India (cruise missiles)
- Iran (nuclear, ballistic missiles)
- Pakistan (cruise missiles)
- Saudi Arabia (nuclear, ballistic missiles).
- e. Safety and Security of WMD:
- Pakistan (nuclear)
- Russia (nuclear).
- Accepted Risks:
- State WMD and ballistic and cruise missile programs of: Egypt (ballistic missiles)
- Libya (ballistic missiles)
- Taiwan (ballistic missiles).
- (S//SI) D. MISSION: U.S. Forces at Risk (Military Support): Protecting U.S. Military Forces Deployed
- Overseas and Enabling their Operations. Focus Areas: a. U.S. forces deployed in: Iraq, Afghanistan, Mideast Region, Korea, and Philippines.
- b. Support to military planning and operations: Support to OPLAN 5027 (Korea). c. Intentions of foreign and indigenous anti-coalition forces, command and control, OOB, and
- operational support in Iraq and Afghanistan.
- d. Support to U.S. forces in identification of HVTs in Afghanistan/ Pakistan and Iraq.
- Accepted Risks: a. Protection of U.S. forces deployed in: Balkans (Kosovo).
- b. South Korea leadership intentions in OPLAN 5027.
- c. Routine military support to U.S. forces deployed in non-combat situations.
- (S//SI) E. MISSION: State/Political Stability: Providing Warning of Impending State Instability.
- Focus Areas: a. Internal political activities that could threaten the survivability of leadership in countries where US
- has interest in regime continuity: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia.
- b. Internal political activities that could result in crisis in: North Korea, Sudan/Dafur humanitarian crisis,
- Cuba, Kosovo, Turkey, Nigeria, Lebanon, Venezuela, Syria, Bolivia, Latin American Bolivarian
- Developments, and Palestinian Authority.
- Accepted Risks: Internal political stability of: Egypt, Zimbabwe, Cote d’Ivoire, Liberia, DROC,
- Bangladesh, Georgia, Jordan, and Haiti.
- (S//SI) F. MISSION: Warning of Strategic Nuclear Missile Threats: Providing Warning of a
- Strategic Nuclear Missile Attack on the territory of the 50 United States.
- Focus Areas: Areas covered under a peacetime SIGINT strategy maintaining full capabilities with
- reasonably sufficient coverage for the provision of warning include: Russia's Nuclear C3, Mobile
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- ICBMs, strategic navy missiles, and Bombers; China's Nuclear C3, Mobile ICBMs, and SSBNs; and
- North Korea's Nuclear C3 and potential ICBM (TD-2) Threat.
- Accepted Risks: Strategic Targets where SIGINT is not a primary intelligence source in providing warning: Russia's Silo-based ICBMs; China's Silo-based ICBMs.
- (S//SI) G. MISSION: Regional Conflict and Crisis/Flashpoints to War: Monitoring Regional
- Tensions that Could Escalate to Conflict/Crisis.
- Focus Areas: Regional flashpoints that could pose a significant threat to U.S. strategic interests:
- Arab/Iran-Israel conflict, Korean Peninsula, China-Taiwan, India-Pakistan, Venezuela (impact on
- surrounding region), and Russia/Georgia
- Accepted Risks: Regional flashpoints in: Ethiopia-Eritrea and Africa Great Lakes Region.
- (S//REL USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL) H. MISSION: Information Operations: Mastering
- Cyberspace and Preventing an Attack on U.S. Critical Information Systems.
- Focus Areas:
- a (S//SI) Enabling Computer Network Defense (CND): Provide cyber threat warning, detection,
- characterization, and mitigation services for U.S. and allied computer network operators: Named
- Intrusion Sets (Including, but not limited to: Gadget Hiss, Seed Sphere/Byzantine Trace, Makers
- Mark, Byzantine Candor), New intrusions.
- b. (S//REL USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL) Enabling Computer Network Attack (CNA): Deliver
- intelligence, access, and dual-use capabilities in support of U.S. computer network attack objectives.
- c. (S//SI) Foreign Intelligence Services’ Cyber Threat Activities: Deliver intelligence on the capabilities, vulnerabilities, plans and intentions of foreign actors to conduct CNO against USG networks and
- those of interest to the USG. Identify what Foreign Intel Services know about USG capabilities.
- vulnerabilities, plans and intentions to conduct CNO: China, Russia, Iran, and al-Qa’ida.
- d (S//SI) Enabling Electronic Warfare (EW): Provide cognizance of the EM environment, signal
- detection/geolocation, and characterization through intelligence (ELINT, COMINT, Tech SIGINT)
- and other technical means to U.S. EW planners and operators: China, Russia, Iran, Iraq/Afghanistan
- (IED’s) and North Korea
- e. (S//SI) Enabling Influence Operations: Support U.S. military deception (MILDEC) and psychological
- operations (PSYOP), and inter-agency Strategic Communication objectives to influence target
- behavior and activities: Terrorist groups, China, North Korea. Iran, and Venezuela.
- Accepted Risks: a. Enabling CND: Isolated malicious activity that could pose a serious threat.
- b. Enabling CNA.
- c. FIS Cyber Threat: France, Israel, Cuba, India, and North Korea.
- d. Enabling EW: (producers/proliferators): Sweden, Japan, Germany, Israel, and France.
- e. Enabling Influence Operations: Pakistan and Russia.
- (S//SI) I. MISSION: Military Modernization: Providing Early Detection of Critical Developments in
- Foreign Military Programs.
- Focus Areas: a. Threat posed by continued modernization as it involves the forces and weapons of: China, North
- Korea, Russia, Iran, and Syria.
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- b. Activities of state and non-state actors (gray arms dealers) in supplying advanced conventional
- weapons.
- c. Threats posed by foreign space and counter-space systems: China and Russia
- Accepted Risks: a. Weapons and force developments in: Saudi Arabia, and India
- b. Threats posed by foreign space and counter-space systems: India and France.
- (S//SI) J. MISSION: Emerging Strategic Technologies: Preventing Technological Surprise.
- Focus Areas: Critical technologies that could provide a strategic military, economic, or political
- advantage: high energy lasers, low energy lasers, advances in computing and information technology,
- directed energy weapons, stealth and counter-stealth, electronic warfare technologies, space and remote
- sensing, electro-optics, nanotechnologies, energetic materials. The emerging strategic technology threat is
- expected to come mainly from Russia, China, India, Japan, Germany, France, Korea, Israel, Singapore, and
- Sweden.
- Accepted Risks: Technological advances and/or basic S&T development on a global basis elsewhere.
- (S//SI) K. MISSION: Foreign Policy ((includes Intention of Nations and Multinational Orgs)): Ensuring Diplomatic Advantage for the U.S.
- Focus Areas: Positions, objectives, programs, and actions on the part of governments or multilateral
- organizations that could significantly impact U.S. national security interests: China, Russia, France,
- Germany, Japan, Iran, Israel, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, UN, Venezuela, Syria,
- Turkey, Mexico, South Korea, India, and Pakistan.
- Accepted Risks: Positions, objectives, programs, and actions on the part of governments or multilateral
- organizations that could impact U.S. foreign policy or security interests: Taiwan.
- (S//SI) L. MISSION: Energy Security: Ensuring a Steady and Reliable Energy Supply for the US.
- Focus Areas: Threats to the production and global distribution/transportation of energy supplies of: Iraq,
- Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Iran, Russia and Nigeria Accepted Risks: Global impact of the state of energy
- industries in: Mexico and China.
- (S//SI) M. MISSION: Foreign Intelligence, Counterintelligence; Denial & Deception Activities:
- Countering Foreign Intelligence Threats.
- Focus Areas: Espionage/intelligence collection operations and manipulation/influence operations
- conducted by foreign intelligence services directed against U.S. government, military, science &
- technology and Intelligence Community from: China, Russia, Cuba, Israel, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea,
- France, Venezuela, and South Korea
- Accepted Risks: Espionage/intelligence collection operations against U.S. government, military, science
- & technology and Intelligence Community from: Taiwan and Saudi Arabia
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- (S//SI) N. MISSION: Narcotics and Transnational Criminal Syndicates and Networks: Mitigating
- the impact on U.S. national interests from drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) and transnational
- criminal syndicates and networks (TCSNs).
- Focus Areas:
- a. DTOs and associated enabling activities in Afghanistan, Mexico and Colombia that threaten
- U.S. interests.
- b. TCSNs based in (or originating in) Russia that threaten U.S. or allied interests. c. Money laundering that benefits TCSNs within, into, and out of Colombia and Mexico.
- d. Criminal facilitators acting as a nexus between crime/narcotics and terrorism. e. State-sponsored money laundering by Iran and North Korea.
- Accepted Risks: a. Drug production/trafficking within the Golden Triangle, China, and North Korea.
- b. TCSNs operating in Central Asia, former Eastern Europe, and Asia.
- c. Criminal associated money laundering in Afghanistan, and Iraq.
- State-sponsored money laundering by Syria.
- (S//SI) O. MISSION: Economic Stability/Influence: Ensuring U.S. Economic Advantage and Policy
- Strategies.
- Focus Areas: Economic stability, financial vulnerability, and economic influence of states of strategic
- interest to the US: China, Japan, Iraq, and Brazil.
- Accepted Risks: Economic stability, financial vulnerability, and economic influence of states of strategic
- interest to the US: Turkey and India.
- (S//SI) P. Mission: Global Signals Cognizance: The core communications infrastructure and global
- network information needed to achieve and maintain baseline knowledge. Capture knowledge of
- location, characterization, use, and status of military and civil communications infrastructure, including
- command, control, communications and computer networks: intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and
- targeting systems; and associated structures incidental to pursuing Strategic Mission List priorities. Focus
- of mission is creating knowledge databases that enable SIGINT efforts against future unanticipated threats
- and allow continuity on economy of force targets not currently included on the Strategic Mission List.
- Focus Areas:
- Global Environment knowledge.
- Signals knowledge.
- Network knowledge.
- Target knowledge.
- Accepted Risks: Degree of maturity may greatly vary by target.
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- (U) II. Strategic Mission List - Enduring Targets
- (S//SI) A. MISSION: China: Enabling U.S. policy and avoiding strategic surprise. Focus Areas:
- Provide U.S. decision makers with a holistic SIGINT perspective of trends and developments in China,
- assessing and/or predicting strategic direction, plans, intentions, and capabilities that impact U.S. interests.
- Such analysis must consider China's strategic foreign and economic policy trends that impact U.S.
- interests or degrade U.S. influence; the pace, scope, doctrine, and economic sustainabilit y of China's
- military modernization; the proliferation of PRC weapons and technology; the prospects for regional conflict or strategic nuclear attack; domestic economic transformation and its consequences for economic,
- political, and social stability; subversive threats to U.S. institutions through hostile intelligence and
- information operations; and the interdependencies among these developments. Accepted Risks: Certain
- domestic problem sets, such as demographic issues; lower-level political institutional growth; civil society
- issues such as crime and human rights; environmental problems and planning; and agricultural production
- and food security. Also, issues that transcend national boundaries, such as Chinese involvement in
- international organized crime; energy demand, production, and acquisition; and infectious disease and
- health.
- (S//SI) B. MISSION: North Korea: Enabling the US to counteract North Korea’s
- Development/proliferation of WMD, deter its aggression, and shape its behavior while
- maintaining U.S. readiness for collapse/war. Focus Areas: Provide U.S. decision-makers with a holistic
- SIGINT perspective of trends and developments in North Korea, assessing and/or predicting strategic
- direction, plans, intentions, and capabilities that impact U.S. interests and provide warning of strategic
- threat Such analysis must consider the stability of the North Korean regime and how it employs domestic
- and foreign policies to maintain its grip on power; the relationship between regime stability/behavior and
- its access to income from illicit activities and weapons proliferation; how Chinese and South Korean
- “carrots and sticks” enable or constrain North Korean behavior; the impact of the decaying North Korean
- economy on military readiness; and how the interplay between U.S. policy initiatives toward North Korea
- and all of the above elements affect North Korea's strategic calculus, the material disposition of its nuclear
- weapons, and the status of its military. Accepted Risks: For domestic issues, risks include non-defense
- oriented industrial production, demographic issues, and environmental problems. Regarding issues that
- transcend borders, risks include non-counterintelligence associated ties between North Korean state- sponsored illicit activities and international organized crime institutions and individuals; North Korean
- agent activity in South Korea and Japan; non-state sponsored corruption and illicit behavior; and North
- Korean economic refugee flows into China
- (S//SI) C. MISSION: Iraq: Enabling Coalition efforts to assist Iraq in establishing a secure, unified,
- democratic, and sovereign state. Focus Areas: Provide U.S. decision makers with a holistic SIGINT
- perspective of trends and developments, assessing Iraq‘s progress toward establishing a viable, stable
- government; securing public order, suppressing insurgent opposition; ensuring reliable access to basic
- services and commodities; safeguarding strategic resources; and restoring a more sound economic footing.
- Provide intelligence on relevant factors, forces, leaders, and regional actors to facilitate U.S. Government
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
- policy or actions in support of the Iraqi process and to seize the strategic communications initiative.
- Accepted Risks: none
- (S//SI) D. MISSION: Iran: Enabling policymakers in preventing Iran from achieving its regional
- dominance objectives and pursuing policies that impact U.S. global interests. Focus Areas: Provide
- U.S. decision makers with a holistic SIGINT perspective of regional trends and developments, assessing
- and/or predicting strategic direction, plans, intentions and capabilities that impact U.S. interests. Assess
- Iran's foreign policy trends and leadership intentions that impact U.S. interests or degrade U.S. influence.
- Provide warning of Iran's capability to produce a nuclear weapon or its plans to use terrorist surrogates to
- attack Israel or U.S. forces and interests. Assess the regime's progress in initiatives that enhance its pursuit
- of regional power objectives in the political, economic, energy, and religious or ideological arenas.
- Provide indicators of regime stability and/or susceptibility to democratic reform initiatives. Accepted
- Risks: Efforts to ascertain the scope of Iran's narcotics/organized crime elements and economic
- stability/influence.
- (S//SI) E. MISSION: Russia: Assuring diplomatic and strategic advantage and avoiding critical
- surprise. Focus Areas: Provide U.S. policy and decision makers with a holistic SIGINT perspective of
- developments and trends in Russia, assessing and/or predicting strategic direction, plans, intentions, and
- capabilities that impact U.S. interests. Such analysis must consider Russia's strategic foreign policy and
- economic intentions and actions as they pertain to U.S. interests and influence in the region and globally;
- the strength of Russia's economy and its impact on Russian power projection capability and strategic
- positioning; Russia's efforts to regain military strength and stimulate economic growth through the
- development and sale of advanced technology and weaponry; and the role of WMD, organized crime and
- counterintelligence in enabling Russian strategic initiatives. Accepted Risks: Certain domestic issues
- such as demographics, regional politics, development of civil society in the country, and monitoring of
- low-level military training activities. Also, issues that transcend national boundaries such as Russia’s
- plans, intentions and capabilities regarding influence on the former Soviet space.
- (S//SI) F. MISSION: Venezuela: Enabling policymakers in preventing Venezuela from achieving its
- regional leadership objectives and pursuing policies that negatively impact U.S. global interests.
- Focus Areas: Provide U.S. decision makers with a holistic SIGINT perspective of regional trends and
- developments, assessing and/or predicting strategic direction, plans, intentions and capabilities that impact
- U.S. interests. Assess Venezuela's foreign policy trends and leadership intentions that impact U.S.
- interests or degrade U.S. influence. Assess Chavez’ progress in his initiatives to pursue regional power objectives in the political, economic, energy, and ideological arenas. Provide indicators of regime
- stability, particularly in the energy sector. Assess the depth and breadth of Venezuela’s relations with
- countries of strategic concern to the United States, particularly Iran, Cuba, China, and Russia. Accepted
- Risks: Efforts to ascertain the scope of Venezuela's narcotics/organized crime elements and economic
- stability/influence.
- Initial publication of this document: NewYorkTimes.com, November 2, 2013
- Conversion into text-readable format: Electrospaces.net, July 27, 2014
- SECRET//COMINT//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR//20291123
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement