t

see machi, you posted for ஊழல், அதுல என்னது கம்மியான ஊழல், ஜாச்தி, எல்லாம் ஒன்னுதான...தப்பு பன்றவங்க எதிர் கட்சில இருந்தாங்கனா, அவங்க மாட்டுவாங்க..இல்லை இரண்டு ஜி மாதிரி வெலியாச்சுனா மாட்டுவாங்க...அப்போ தடுக்கறத்துக்கு வழி பார்க்கணும்...எலெக்‌ஷன் ஸ்பான்சர்ஸ், ஒண்ணு ஊழல் பணம், இல்லை பிஸினஸ் பணம்(previous or future), அப்படி இருக்கும் போது results correct kidaiyaathu..! system could be manipulated into desired result easily, when there are atleast ten diff candidates contesting, for a single constituency..laws have to be preventive by nature and not punishable for mistakes until now..

process of electing candidates has to completely change...picking up a good one should be based on debates..and elected reps have to be done at the same time..we ppl can think of only one govt..we cant think of many diff govts..so, software system extensively tested by different orgnzntns, should contain appropriate rules to maintain democracy by allowing ppl to give priority to vote for even three candidates, at a particular level(state or centre)..

and ppl have to understand politicians who have served them aren't completely corrupt, as those are the kind mainly getting mostly highlighted and mistakes would have happened, as its a large democracy..so, if politicians form a committee, and come up with such preventive measures, we have to find quality analysis for the future, than analyzing/making law equal for all, which practically isn't true even to 60-70 percent