Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-04 1900 +Freddie Sparks
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clbC8Boa2ww&lc=z13dd1hzozv3ivkm523shpzbok3mjz3yf04
- https://pastebin.com/SNqMit1b
- __
- +Freddie Sparks __ You deserve a prize. Yes - "stroller" and then "pram". But there's more to it. In Australia (and the UK) you'd call it a "pram" - though a person in Australia _might also_ say "stroller". In the US it's only/chiefly called a "stroller" I think (+Terran Downvale can tell us).
- And so if "Christine Nixon" were speaking freely then she can be expected to say *either* "pram" or "stroller". However - *if she were reading from a script then the script writer would have used the word "pram"* (for the Australian audience) *_not knowing that "Christine Nixon" is someone who would normally say "stroller"_*.
- If the event had been completely staged (i.e., a lie system presentation) then we cannot expect such a "mistake" to have been made. The script writer would have been consistent (although the difference is not a "fatal" mistake it doesn't serve any point because it's not a debunkable "truther trap").
- However - if it were a genuine event *with a rapidly conceived "how the f_kc can we cover this up?"* (i.e., - a "mini hoax" *within* a real tragedy that has unfolded in public) - _then such a detail difference could always be observed_.
- Of course - it isn't proof of anything. But does not a person tend to say either "pram" or "stroller" *and not mix up the terms between conversations*?
- (At least not unless "Christine Nixon" had subsequently heard people saying "pram" and realised that was the word she should have been using.)
- The *geographic* change in word/term suggests that at least one of the interviews could have been scripted. An Australian script writer would only use pram - but an Australian speaking freely might say "stroller". With an event being covered up "on the fly" that detail could slip through the cracks.
- It just so happens that the one interview which *could be* "scripted" happens to "correct" and *contradict* some of the details she spoke freely about in the "3AW" interview.
- For example - in the interview where she used the term "pram" *she was careful to say that the pursuing police were ON THE ROAD*. That's a crucial detail which misdirects the audience's attention AWAY from the possibility of police having hit anyone on the pavement.
- But we know police *did* travel at high speed along the pavement unless we are willing to accuse "John Anstasio" of lying and being "in on the hoax"!
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
- https://lestanediam.blogspot.com
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vimeo
- https://vimeo.com/lestanediam
- Lesta Nediam's Vidme
- https://vid.me/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Dailymotion
- https://www.dailymotion.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's LiveLeak
- https://www.liveleak.com/c/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
- https://disqus.com/home/forum/lestanediam/
- Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
