Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [15:05] Checkmater: kylecole
- [15:05] Checkmater: make qsns' team a sample already
- [15:05] @KyleCole: no
- [15:05] @KyleCole: fun fact
- [15:06] @KyleCole: a week after i took the rain team off
- [15:06] @KyleCole: 6 different people asked me for the importable
- [15:06] Checkmater: [15:05] @KyleCole: no
- [15:06] Checkmater: explain?
- [15:06] @KyleCole: like during that first week i mean
- [15:06] Checkmater: you didn't make a post or anything
- [15:06] @KyleCole: 1) we're supposed to have a jirachi suspect why would i add a jirachi team
- [15:06] @KyleCole: 2) i dont think its very good
- [15:06] @KyleCole: but mostly 1
- [15:06] Checkmater: what
- [15:06] Checkmater: just because we're suspecting jirachi
- [15:07] Checkmater: isn't a reason to fukn not have a jirachi in the samples
- [15:07] Checkmater: should we have gotten rid of kots before the skymin suspect finished?
- [15:07] Checkmater: there's no harm in putting it in
- [15:07] @KyleCole: o
- [15:07] @KyleCole: well that was in the thread
- [15:07] @KyleCole: before a suspect was announced
- [15:08] Checkmater: jirachi suspect is retarded anyways
- [15:08] Checkmater: and
- [15:08] %Yoda2798♫: tbh I would argue that a jirachi suspect means even more that there should be a sample team with it, to help people have informed opinions on it
- [15:08] Checkmater: [15:06] Checkmater: just because we're suspecting jirachi
- [15:08] Checkmater: [15:07] Checkmater: isn't a reason to fukn not have a jirachi in the samples
- [15:08] @KyleCole: yes it is
- [15:08] @KyleCole: but also
- [15:08] @KyleCole: 2)
- [15:08] Checkmater: the team has reached cross-usage among lots of people
- [15:08] Checkmater: enough that it's a sample
- [15:09] @KyleCole: and yet i still dont think its very good
- [15:09] @KyleCole: amazing
- [15:09] Checkmater: hell more people use it than checkroom
- [15:09] Checkmater: detail why it's not good
- [15:11] Checkmater: alright
- [15:11] Checkmater: no response
- [15:11] Checkmater: just k fam.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement