Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Apr 7th, 2016
139
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.92 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [15:05] Checkmater: kylecole
  2. [15:05] Checkmater: make qsns' team a sample already
  3. [15:05] @KyleCole: no
  4. [15:05] @KyleCole: fun fact
  5. [15:06] @KyleCole: a week after i took the rain team off
  6. [15:06] @KyleCole: 6 different people asked me for the importable
  7. [15:06] Checkmater: [15:05] @KyleCole: no
  8. [15:06] Checkmater: explain?
  9. [15:06] @KyleCole: like during that first week i mean
  10. [15:06] Checkmater: you didn't make a post or anything
  11. [15:06] @KyleCole: 1) we're supposed to have a jirachi suspect why would i add a jirachi team
  12. [15:06] @KyleCole: 2) i dont think its very good
  13. [15:06] @KyleCole: but mostly 1
  14. [15:06] Checkmater: what
  15. [15:06] Checkmater: just because we're suspecting jirachi
  16. [15:07] Checkmater: isn't a reason to fukn not have a jirachi in the samples
  17. [15:07] Checkmater: should we have gotten rid of kots before the skymin suspect finished?
  18. [15:07] Checkmater: there's no harm in putting it in
  19. [15:07] @KyleCole: o
  20. [15:07] @KyleCole: well that was in the thread
  21. [15:07] @KyleCole: before a suspect was announced
  22. [15:08] Checkmater: jirachi suspect is retarded anyways
  23. [15:08] Checkmater: and
  24. [15:08] %Yoda2798♫: tbh I would argue that a jirachi suspect means even more that there should be a sample team with it, to help people have informed opinions on it
  25. [15:08] Checkmater: [15:06] Checkmater: just because we're suspecting jirachi
  26. [15:08] Checkmater: [15:07] Checkmater: isn't a reason to fukn not have a jirachi in the samples
  27. [15:08] @KyleCole: yes it is
  28. [15:08] @KyleCole: but also
  29. [15:08] @KyleCole: 2)
  30. [15:08] Checkmater: the team has reached cross-usage among lots of people
  31. [15:08] Checkmater: enough that it's a sample
  32. [15:09] @KyleCole: and yet i still dont think its very good
  33. [15:09] @KyleCole: amazing
  34. [15:09] Checkmater: hell more people use it than checkroom
  35. [15:09] Checkmater: detail why it's not good
  36. [15:11] Checkmater: alright
  37. [15:11] Checkmater: no response
  38. [15:11] Checkmater: just k fam.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement