Advertisement
Lesta

12 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-03-05 1825 +Peekay Truth

Mar 5th, 2017
94
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.20 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-03-05 1825 +Peekay Truth
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSjXD-kBn8I&lc=z123zpswhmn2vpwi404cczaovlfaungwxp40k
  3. https://pastebin.com/RYkLpSqj
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Peekay Truth __ Leading the witness much - Mr "Hides TRUTH"? Your witness says he saw people getting run over but yet you repeat the claim that *no one* got run over. Remind me - who again was the witness?
  7.  
  8.  
  9. Are you suggesting that your witness was *mistaken* about seeing people get run over *but not mistaken* about being told to move on "the day before"?
  10.  
  11.  
  12. Your witness claims he saw people getting run over behind him *but you then immediately told to him that was not the case*. Remind me - who again was the witness?
  13.  
  14.  
  15. I wonder - *why would you dispute the idea of people getting run over where he said*? Why were you so adamant that people could only have gotten run over along the path in front of the shops?
  16.  
  17.  
  18. *Without clear CCTV footage of the alleged incident it remains possible that the police ran people over as well*. Why would you actively guard against that possibility just to push your "100% fake" agenda?
  19.  
  20.  
  21. Wouldn't the idea of police running people over and covering it up be a far more explosive and damning "headline" for a self-described "investigative journalist"? By the way - you are no such thing. Calling yourself a "journalist" does not make it any more so than when "David Seaman" does it.
  22.  
  23.  
  24. What you are - Mr "HIDES Truth" is a *dishonest conspiracy nutcase* who is cultivating an audience of intellectually vulnerable people and exploiting them for your own shameful ends by making repeated *bad observations*.
  25.  
  26.  
  27. Your witness claims the car was travelling (as fast as) 150km/h. You suggest to the witness that it cannot have been the case. Remind me - who again was the witness?
  28.  
  29.  
  30. If your witness is claiming to have witnessed several things *that you accept are not possible* then why would you consider him to be anything other than an *unreliable witness*?
  31.  
  32.  
  33. Well - I've already given the answer. You are a *dishonest conspiracy nutcase* who is on par with "Dave Johnson" and "Jungle Surfer" in terms of incompetence and inaccuracy.
  34.  
  35.  
  36. If the witness claims to have seen things that you believe cannot have been the case *then why are you arbitrarily picking and choosing the parts of his testimony which affirm your pre-existing belief bias*?
  37.  
  38.  
  39. Again I have already given the answer. You are a *dishonest conspiracy nutcase* who is an *attention seeker* and not a "truth seeker".
  40.  
  41.  
  42. A case could be made that *you* are working with the police to prevent genuine event skeptics from figuring out that the event *did result in harm to people* and that *the police were responsible for at least some of those deaths and injuries*.
  43.  
  44.  
  45. The witness you spoke to seemed to be responding in a way so as to get you to leave him alone. He seemed to be saying "yeah" to everything you asked him (and then you "corrected" him whenever the "yeah" didn't fit in with your "100% fake" agenda). He probably would have said "yeah" if you'd asked him if he thought "Tony Abbott" was also "Tony Blair".
  46.  
  47.  
  48. The audio you recorded was unclear and it would not surprise me if you had tampered with it to create the impression you wanted for your retarded and gullible audience.
  49.  
  50.  
  51. *SHAME ON YOU*.
  52.  
  53.  
  54. You - Mr "HIDES Truth" are a *dishonest little f_kc* who is not fooling anyone but the most miserably stupid. This comment has been copied to my Google Plus where it can be seen by all because your dishonesty *forces* you to moderate comments _and remove mine_.
  55.  
  56.  
  57. The right eyes will this and it will be only a matter of time before there is a *significant backlash* against you. You *deserve* what's coming your way. Tick-tock Mr "HIDES the TRUTH".
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61. ______________________________________________________________
  62. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  63.  
  64. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  65. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  66.  
  67. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  68. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  69.  
  70. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  71. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  72.  
  73. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  74. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  75.  
  76. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  77. What exists - exists to always exist.
  78. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement