mobenomics5

Equating a different biologic state from oneself
with evil is historically common and people still
think in terms of evil.

As to homosexuality, optimally occurring such as
it implying, contrary to common presumpption, more
masculinity, such that that's consistent with the
Spartan Army having been a gay army, J. Edgar,
etc.,
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-14/news/47336502_1_orientation-genes-chromosome

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html

there was naturally a clash with male chauvinism and insecurity as
well. This precluded birthright and naturalized alliance with
overlords commanding sword wielding armies.

http://pastebin.com/3MHbxdus
mobenomics4

The person transferring political scapegoating based on

sexual insecurity is the likelier gay gene carrier for the

same reason Hitler was gay.

From the following understand Nazinomics is really
about male limitation, though in the formula oligarch
privatizes, woman challenges masculinity of the
non-anti-social male the woman who enjoys doing
that will be elevated and treated as an equal,
for those who like Nazinomics.

The person transfering it will be likelier gay
as was Hitler. Replacing democracy with scapegoating
based on sexual insecurity process self produces
gay fascists and arrogant sons.

We know it's importantly about judging and transfer
of insecurity and limitation because of how the religious
right used as front people the likes of Jack Ruby and
Jack Abramoff (opinion.)

When the demagogue replaces democracy and the man-hater
calls unmanly or gay (slander or otherwise) the objector his and
her son will be a scapegoater, sexually insecure, a knower of
ego defense exclusively.

The product of recognition and love is the womanizer and
the magnanimous neighbor.

Fascist economics is the undemocratic power
center and it's pyramid and culture of arrogance
replacing democracy, and the man-hater calling unmanly or gay (slander or
otherwise) the disapprover.

That's scapegoating, or judging, in place of equality freedom
and love, but particularly based on transfering sexual insecurity.
It process self-produces gays by causing the gay gene to
pass maternally (there are multiple genetically mediated
inducers but there is an X chromosome bound genetic.)

This core of fascist gays was produced by what was not a calculated
system of fascism but a natural outgrowth of male chauvinism and
personal chauvinism, and ignorance, conveniently serving a
welcoming ally of control.

Gays are not bad, being occurrent for group
benefit including serving in the army (Spartans a
gay army; Alexander; J. Edgar; etc.)

The process self-produced ones, being heir to, and also
a product of, the continuation of male chauvinism mixed with
ignorance, with women who will scapegoat and assume a god
complex being welcome partners, including the most scapegoating,
gay bashing (hypocritically),
fascist and war-mongering persons in Washington, ARE an identifiable
operatively "bad" group.

We know that in the formula oligarch replaces democracy and woman
who'll call unmanly or gay the person not paranoid or anti-social
or sexually insecure and given to transferring that, denial of
recognition, love and appreciation is very important, from the
high importance placed by the religious right in fronting
Jack Ruby, Jack Abramoff, and the like.

It's the pathetic sexual reward-like behaviors celebrating
killing of Gazans, in Israel. It's the suicide bombers promised
72 virgins.

It's the Mexican mob. It's the Mexican leadership where it's
mob like.

It's the Vegas mob including mob benefiting oligarchy supporting
Israel's partnership responsible for corrupted histories.

Gay generally actually more masculine; how it is the person transferring Nazinomics
is likerlier gay, the same way Hitler was gay.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-14/news/47336502_1_orientation-genes-chromosome

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html

It's forces of control and arrogance on the police force or
in the board room (in the U.S.)

They will welcome any symbol of minority participation.

For this, they will bestow equality.

It probably is a remake of the supposed earlier (pre-Essene)
Israeli existence (male chauvinism and ignorance produced
"gay as capital status crime," still the law in some of today's
Muslim countries.)

As African nations such as Uganda and Kenya embark on
this early defined path, they will be on their to being defined
by control and arrogance, and the absence of freedom, equality
and love. They will also have, increasingly over future generations,
a core process self-produced gay leadership scapegoating gays.

People like this are less interested in knowledge that can
help people because they are interested in playing god
rather than being compassionate and having the wherewithall
for helping people.

Playing god is judging. Perhaps judging replaced love after
the Aldobrandini (Clement) - Amschel Bauder (Rothschild--
means "Red Shield," for banker to the Vatican, the term being
Jesuit. J.P. Morgan, founder of Monsanto, was Jesuit.)

Israel can reform itself, as can the Arab lands, and can Europe,
the U.S. and the rest of the world, but it is a product of this
mistaken precedent.

But all of these things confirm a combined history and must
have occurred by plan.

The more people understand these things the more, for
a fact, others will come forward with proofs of foresight and
multi-disciplinary validation.

When the demagogue replaces democracy and the man-hater
calls unmanly or gay (slander or otherwise) the objector his and
her son will be a scapegoater, sexually insecure, a knower of
ego defense exclusively.

The product of recognition and love is the womanizer and
the magnanimous neighbor.

Virtually everything that's supposed to be a tip-off for a
male being gay is none such the thing in the East (males
bike, eat soy, produce non-gay babies and don't grow
breasts.) In the East not acting paranoid or anti-social
will not be a tip-off of homosexuality.

The person transferring sexual insecurity will be the
likelier gay gene carrier just as Hitler was gay, and just
as the rich guys at the Bohemian Grove are gay.

The most ardent fascists in Congress are continually
being discovered being gay.

The Nazis first killed gays, then the mentally ill, and
then Jews (also gypsies, and haphazardly, Catholics,
even though many Nazis were Catholic.)

Today's Germany has no more to do with that than
the persons installed to uphold plutocracy in Israel
have to do with proper Jewish history.

It must be highly likely the K St. group's a gay group.

Gays are normal, occurring with optimality (actually more
masculine, with the ancient armies proved being mostly
gay armies in certain cases, which would be one way they
served the clan overall.) They occur more frequently, and
in a process self produced manner, in the scapegoating
sexually insecure community. The gay fascists are more
than would have happened, and they need a place.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-14/news/47336502_1_orientation-genes-chromosome

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html

Until it was discovered the gay gene passes maternally
man-hating mother was thought the basis of male
homosexuality.


============================================================


Does Ann Coulter fit the role banker privatizes a market
and a man-hater (opinion and/or don't know as to her)
calls unmanly or gay (slandering or not) the male who's
simply not sociopathic, fraudulent, arrogant, a scapegoater,
a control master or a hypocritical process self-produced gay?

Oligarchs would want the woman who likes filling the role,

whether or not that applies to Coulter.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pittsburgh+coulter+gore+gay

Is she left handed?  Does she have a lengthy index finger?


http://pastebin.com/3MHbxdus
mobenomics4

The person transferring political scapegoating based on

sexual insecurity is the likelier gay gene carrier for the

same reason Hitler was gay.

From the following understand Nazinomics is really
about male limitation, though in the formula oligarch
privatizes, woman challenges masculinity of the
non-anti-social male the woman who enjoys doing
that will be elevated and treated as an equal,
for those who like Nazinomics.

The person transfering it will be likelier gay
as was Hitler. Replacing democracy with scapegoating
based on sexual insecurity process self produces
gay fascists and arrogant sons.

We know it's importantly about judging and transfer
of insecurity and limitation because of how the religious
right used as front people the likes of Jack Ruby and
Jack Abramoff (opinion.)

When the demagogue replaces democracy and the man-hater
calls unmanly or gay (slander or otherwise) the objector his and
her son will be a scapegoater, sexually insecure, a knower of
ego defense exclusively.

The product of recognition and love is the womanizer and
the magnanimous neighbor.

Fascist economics is the undemocratic power
center and it's pyramid and culture of arrogance
replacing democracy, and the man-hater calling unmanly or gay (slander or
otherwise) the disapprover.

That's scapegoating, or judging, in place of equality freedom
and love, but particularly based on transfering sexual insecurity.
It process self-produces gays by causing the gay gene to
pass maternally (there are multiple genetically mediated
inducers but there is an X chromosome bound genetic.)

This core of fascist gays was produced by what was not a calculated
system of fascism but a natural outgrowth of male chauvinism and
personal chauvinism, and ignorance, conveniently serving a
welcoming ally of control.

Gays are not bad, being occurrent for group
benefit including serving in the army (Spartans a
gay army; Alexander; J. Edgar; etc.)

The process self-produced ones, being heir to, and also
a product of, the continuation of male chauvinism mixed with
ignorance, with women who will scapegoat and assume a god
complex being welcome partners, including the most scapegoating,
gay bashing (hypocritically),
fascist and war-mongering persons in Washington, ARE an identifiable
operatively "bad" group.

We know that in the formula oligarch replaces democracy and woman
who'll call unmanly or gay the person not paranoid or anti-social
or sexually insecure and given to transferring that, denial of
recognition, love and appreciation is very important, from the
high importance placed by the religious right in fronting
Jack Ruby, Jack Abramoff, and the like.

It's the pathetic sexual reward-like behaviors celebrating
killing of Gazans, in Israel. It's the suicide bombers promised
72 virgins.

It's the Mexican mob. It's the Mexican leadership where it's
mob like.

It's the Vegas mob including mob benefiting oligarchy supporting
Israel's partnership responsible for corrupted histories.

Gay generally actually more masculine; how it is the person transferring Nazinomics
is likerlier gay, the same way Hitler was gay.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-14/news/47336502_1_orientation-genes-chromosome

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html

It's forces of control and arrogance on the police force or
in the board room (in the U.S.)

They will welcome any symbol of minority participation.

For this, they will bestow equality.

It probably is a remake of the supposed earlier (pre-Essene)
Israeli existence (male chauvinism and ignorance produced
"gay as capital status crime," still the law in some of today's
Muslim countries.)

As African nations such as Uganda and Kenya embark on
this early defined path, they will be on their to being defined
by control and arrogance, and the absence of freedom, equality
and love. They will also have, increasingly over future generations,
a core process self-produced gay leadership scapegoating gays.

People like this are less interested in knowledge that can
help people because they are interested in playing god
rather than being compassionate and having the wherewithall
for helping people.

Playing god is judging. Perhaps judging replaced love after
the Aldobrandini (Clement) - Amschel Bauder (Rothschild--
means "Red Shield," for banker to the Vatican, the term being
Jesuit. J.P. Morgan, founder of Monsanto, was Jesuit.)

Israel can reform itself, as can the Arab lands, and can Europe,
the U.S. and the rest of the world, but it is a product of this
mistaken precedent.

But all of these things confirm a combined history and must
have occurred by plan.

The more people understand these things the more, for
a fact, others will come forward with proofs of foresight and
multi-disciplinary validation.

When the demagogue replaces democracy and the man-hater
calls unmanly or gay (slander or otherwise) the objector his and
her son will be a scapegoater, sexually insecure, a knower of
ego defense exclusively.

The product of recognition and love is the womanizer and
the magnanimous neighbor.

Virtually everything that's supposed to be a tip-off for a
male being gay is none such the thing in the East (males
bike, eat soy, produce non-gay babies and don't grow
breasts.) In the East not acting paranoid or anti-social
will not be a tip-off of homosexuality.

The person transferring sexual insecurity will be the
likelier gay gene carrier just as Hitler was gay, and just
as the rich guys at the Bohemian Grove are gay.

The most ardent fascists in Congress are continually
being discovered being gay.

The Nazis first killed gays, then the mentally ill, and
then Jews (also gypsies, and haphazardly, Catholics,
even though many Nazis were Catholic.)

Today's Germany has no more to do with that than
the persons installed to uphold plutocracy in Israel
have to do with proper Jewish history.

It must be highly likely the K St. group's a gay group.

Gays are normal, occurring with optimality (actually more
masculine, with the ancient armies proved being mostly
gay armies in certain cases, which would be one way they
served the clan overall.) They occur more frequently, and
in a process self produced manner, in the scapegoating
sexually insecure community. The gay fascists are more
than would have happened, and they need a place.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-14/news/47336502_1_orientation-genes-chromosome

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2001/03/does_being_a_jock_make_a_man_gay.html

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/695142.stm

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html

Until it was discovered the gay gene passes maternally
man-hating mother was thought the basis of male
homosexuality.