Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Mar 15th, 2017
133
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.36 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 12:11:28 AM [#] [MateoC] I think that we should just use C
  2. 12:11:32 AM [#] [MateoC] There's M_PI
  3. 12:11:35 AM [#] [dTal] jacobly: so you disagree with the use of nonlethal weapons
  4. 12:11:36 AM [prgmTrouble] I don't degree
  5. 12:11:41 AM [#] [MateoC] But no M_TAU
  6. 12:12:01 AM [#] [jacobly] I wouldn't say lethal weapons are easier, but that's just me
  7. 12:12:13 AM [_iPhoenix_] I vote lethal weapons. JUST FREAKING SETTLE THE ISSUE!
  8. 12:12:30 AM [#] [jacobly] #define M_TAU (M_PI/2)
  9. 12:12:51 AM [#] [jacobly] / because that's how I'm defining it
  10. 12:13:11 AM [#] [MateoC] Haha jacobly++
  11. 12:13:19 AM [prgmTrouble] #define M_TAU (2M_PI)
  12. 12:13:27 AM [#] [jacobly] SYNTAX ERROR
  13. 12:13:43 AM [#] [MateoC] ERR: Internal error 3214324
  14. 12:13:51 AM [#] [MateoC] Please contact Technical Support
  15. 12:14:01 AM [#] [MateoC] That's about as good as ZDS does
  16. 12:14:10 AM [#] [dTal] I don't think that'll work, won't the macro expand to 23.14159...
  17. 12:14:18 AM [#] [jacobly] no
  18. 12:14:22 AM ***prgmTrouble <
  19. 12:14:24 AM [#] [jacobly] it is a syntax erro
  20. 12:14:25 AM [#] [jacobly] r
  21. 12:14:49 AM ***prgmTrouble <--
  22. 12:14:37 AM [#] [jacobly] because 2M_PI is not a valid number
  23. 12:14:52 AM [#] [jacobly] and M_PI2 would be undefined
  24. 12:15:04 AM [prgmTrouble] mah name
  25. 12:15:17 AM [#] [MateoC] Good thing M_2PI is sometimes defined
  26. 12:15:31 AM [prgmTrouble] its a conspiracy
  27. 12:15:56 AM [prgmTrouble] it's
  28. 12:16:23 AM [#] [dTal] my reaction on learning about Tau was "how could I, and especially the people around me, have been so stupid"
  29. 12:16:47 AM [#] [dTal] I am baffled by the pi-defenders
  30. 12:16:56 AM [prgmTrouble] I blame the government
  31. 12:17:42 AM [prgmTrouble] the government put dihydrogen monoxide in our water
  32. <snip> (Mateo believes Diameter is easier to measure then Radius, then
  33. dTal talks nerd stuff, which gets Mateo (and everyone else) confused)
  34. 12:19:32 AM [prgmTrouble] use DEG
  35. 12:19:44 AM [ReGuess] use GRAD
  36. 12:19:57 AM [#] [Ivoah] Use Tai
  37. 12:20:14 AM [prgmTrouble] use calculator
  38. *more nerd stuff from dTal
  39. *nerd arguing
  40. 12:23:09 AM [#] [MateoC] Let's just go do something productive like fix Mateo's scaling routine
  41. 12:23:11 AM [#] *MateoC hides
  42. 12:23:32 AM [#] [Ivoah] Or solve integrals
  43. 12:23:44 AM [prgmTrouble] or use degrees
  44. *nerd stuff from jacobly
  45. 12:24:47 AM [#] [MateoC] Have fun drawing your unit circle in terms of tau :P
  46. 12:25:19 AM [prgmTrouble] just do double the existing fraction
  47. 12:25:31 AM [ReGuess] prgmTrouble, if you like degrees so much, tell me, what's the formula for the length of an arc of a circle with radius r through an angle theta
  48. 12:25:32 AM [#] [dTal] MateoC: I don't see the problem
  49. 12:26:05 AM [#] [jacobly] even better with degrees, what d/dx sin(x) where is is degrees :P
  50. 12:26:10 AM [#] [jacobly] *x
  51. *dTal talking about integrals of [zZz]
  52. *prgmTrouble thinking about cosx, incorrectly.
  53. 12:28:24 AM [_iPhoenix_] Awkward Silence :)
  54. 12:29:16 AM [_iPhoenix_] did dTal explode everyone's brains?
  55. 12:29:17 AM [prgmTrouble] reguess: 2pi*r*theta/360
  56. 12:29:47 AM [_iPhoenix_] lel pi in degrees
  57. 12:30:01 AM [ReGuess] correct.
  58. 12:30:19 AM [_iPhoenix_] prgmTrouble had to ReGuess
  59. 12:30:21 AM [prgmTrouble] using pi as a ratio -_-
  60. 12:30:42 AM [_iPhoenix_] ik
  61. *ReGuess gives me karma
  62. *nikkybot fangirling over tswilliamson for no reason
  63. 12:31:56 AM [ReGuess] I'm working on the derivative. Let u = tau*x/360. d/dx sin(360*u/tau) = cos(360*u/tau)du/dx =...
  64. *Nerd ^^
  65. 12:32:50 AM [ReGuess] (tau/360)cosx
  66. *Much nerd ^^
  67. 12:33:39 AM [prgmTrouble] pi/180*cosx
  68. 12:33:48 AM [prgmTrouble] if x is in degrees
  69. *he's all about degrees, 'bout degrees, prgmTrouble
  70. *updated the post*
  71. 12:34:07 AM [ReGuess] 0x5 _iPhoenix_++
  72. 12:34:10 AM [#] [jacobly] heh, that work was wrong but the answer was right...
  73. 12:34:11 AM [_iPhoenix_] :)
  74. 12:34:16 AM [ReGuess] I wear that label with pride
  75. 12:34:59 AM [#] [Pieman] I love it when i get the answer right with the wrong work! :P
  76. 12:35:21 AM [ReGuess] is it wrong because of my choice of fundamental constant? or was my work actually wrong?
  77. 12:36:18 AM [#] [jacobly] well the last step doesn't follow, so something earlier was wrong if you got the right answer
  78. 12:36:40 AM [#] [jacobly] maybe?
  79. 12:37:37 AM [prgmTrouble] hmmm
  80. *extreme nerdism happening
  81. 12:37:47 AM [ReGuess] cos(360*u/tau)du/dx = cos(360*u/tau)(tau/360) = (tau/360)cos(x)
  82. 12:38:11 AM [ReGuess] chain rule
  83. *minds go boom
  84. 12:38:24 AM [#] [jacobly] I'm just confused because you substituted for x
  85. 12:38:35 AM [#] [Pieman] @#$% it! I just remembered that I have a huge-a calculus test tomorrow...
  86. 12:38:41 AM [#] [Pieman] Rip
  87. 12:38:48 AM [#] *Pieman dies
  88. 12:38:51 AM [ReGuess] oh. me too.
  89. *ReGuess, you'll ace it...
  90. 12:39:04 AM [prgmTrouble] I only have a quiz
  91. *so do I
  92. 12:39:43 AM [prgmTrouble] on F$%^ trig integrals with u substitutions and a log rule
  93. 12:40:03 AM ***prgmTrouble rage quits life
  94. *but then you won't be there for your quiz
  95. 12:40:07 AM [ReGuess] Yeah, you need to study
  96. 12:40:27 AM [ReGuess] if the chat logs are any measure.
  97. *I'm keeping the log(chat
  98. 12:40:28 AM [#] *Pieman hands prgmTrouble a table to flip
  99. 12:40:55 AM [_iPhoenix_] ~flip
  100. 12:40:56 AM [#] [DoorsCS] (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
  101. 12:41:17 AM [prgmTrouble] 0x5
  102. *ReGuess goes to bed
  103. 12:41:49 AM [Cemetech] _iPhoenix_ edited a post in [Tau vs Pi]
  104. 12:43:49 AM [_iPhoenix_] :)
  105. 12:43:59 AM [_iPhoenix_] I kept the log(chat
  106. 12:44:09 AM [prgmTrouble] priceless
  107. *prgmTrouble talks about how number theory, asks how can we count with certainty anymore, and becomes a George Orwell-citing conspiracy theorist.
  108. 12:47:49 AM [prgmTrouble] there's a glitch in the matrix. the world isn't real
  109. 12:48:24 AM [prgmTrouble] "2+2=5" -George Orwell
  110. 12:49:08 AM [prgmTrouble] Big Bang (Theory)
  111. 12:49:20 AM [#] [MateoC] Evolution is just a theory
  112. *Mateo, look at 2/3 of my programs in the archives
  113. 12:49:30 AM [prgmTrouble] #ItsOnlyATheory
  114. 12:49:57 AM [#] [Pieman] C is just a theory
  115. 12:50:01 AM [#] *Pieman hides
  116. *burn mateo
  117. *I roast prgmTrouble for using the word 'triggered' offensively. He promptly runs to the bomb shelter.
  118. 12:51:43 AM [prgmTrouble] people are only theories
  119. 12:52:11 AM ***_iPhoenix_ has to gtg
  120. *<snip> I'm back
  121. *prgmTrouble acts like a jerk (jk)
  122. *I tell him to stop, Ivoah asks me why?
  123. *Alex (comic) tells people to stop, everyone listens
  124. 12:58:08 AM ***prgmTrouble waits for a "[Cemetech] _iPhoenix_ added a post in [Tau vs Pi]" to happen with an annotation
  125. 12:58:31 AM [_iPhoenix_] Sure
  126. *an annotation
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement