Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Aug 28th, 2016
63
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.10 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. I am bound into freer movements. My only freedom is to act onward.
  3.  
  4. The formation of movements in experience constitutes an act-inertia that motivates the ways in which I would further move. As I move, I form an embedding through which I move onward. In any embedding, I perceive moving beings through an apperception of their “aliveness”. The apperception of their “aliveness” originates from my own passive genesis of “aliveness”, upon which all of my movements and all of my perceptions are formed.
  5. Transcendental constraints motivate my originary passive “aliveness” to form a mode of “aliveness” that can willingly move against transcendental constraints: active experience. As active experience is formed and kept, transcendental constraints become the embedding that I form, by moving against it. The re-forming circularity of movement and embedding forms through its act-inertia that already furthers the circularity. In a purely passive frame, the act-inertia is “to keep living”. In an isolated active frame of experience, the act-inertia is “to keep moving”. In a full intersubjective frame of experience, the act-inertia is “to keep going”. In each frame, an idea of freedom is uncovered as a “freedom to act onward”. Freedom in acting is the act-inertia of moving further. Acts that are intersubjectively willed through this act-inertia are the acts of an agent, in the limits of the agent-full act.
  6. As an agent, in the limits of my formed agency, I am only free to try again, to fail, or to succeed.
  7.  
  8. The side thesis is that any post-agent morality is originary to any aesthetic, since all perceptions are already apperceiving “aliveness” in others, upon my own passive aliveness. Any aesthetic is formed from perceiving movements of others, in situations in which the other's aliveness is adumbrated by wearing any lifeless embedding. Any aesthetic is formed in extension to an immanent morality of movement and of movement perception. A pure aesthetic in actu can only be formed by individuals that do not form the apperception of “aliveness” when perceiving others.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement